Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Employer Issues
Reply to "Agency vs Solo"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just an FYI- Many agencies do not do a background check on their nannies these days until AFTER they receive a job offer. They don't like to spend the money on them unless they are getting something in return. Obviously most of them come back fine, but that's the current business model that I've seen most agencies use these days. [/quote] This is standard practice in all fields, including teaching and healthcare. Why would nannies be any different?[/quote] One of the biggest sale'so pitch of agencies is that they have the best well referenced, CPR and top background checks of all the candidates they represent. Employers seeing that from agencies assume agencies will not waste their time sending candidates they have not done a background check on. Regardless if it is standard practice in other forms of employment agencies are sending the message that their all their candidates have a background check before working with them. If agencies are sending a mixed message why would anyone employer pay the crazy fee and go online. And usually most employers will check references themselves and do their own background check even if the agency says they do it, for their own piece of mind. So the question is what are agencies doing for their outrageous fees?[/quote] Nothing besides their expert marketing pitch.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics