Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Discussion
Reply to "mb can "ask" me anything she wants"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nannies posting that contracts are unenforceable: did you go to law school? There are certain types of agreements or terms that MAY be in a contract that would be unenforceable. But are you trying to argue that if the contracts says you get paid $20/hr and employer gives you paid holidays, but then employer shorts you by $2/hr an refuses to pay holidays, that you wouldn't argue that the contract is enforceable? Of course you would. It is a legal agreement. In the case of a dispute, the court will look to the legal agreement. Here are some terms in our agreement that are enforceable. One is that if nanny takes vacation in excess of accrued amount, nanny must repay at termination (or it is withheld from her fina check). Another allows for immediate termination with no separation pay if nanny uses cell phone while driving. Another is that we have agreed to pay for certain holidays. All are enforceable. What's not enforceable is requiring someone to work for you for the full term of the contract. There may be an early termination penalty, but you cannot force someone to remain in your employ. That would indeed be unenforceable as it is contrary to public policy. But to say a nanny contract isn't a contract or is unenforceable as a whole is simply wrong. [/quote] While I agree that if someone states that they will pay you $20/Hr, then shorts you $2/Hr, etc., then yes....That would stand up in a court of law. It is illegal to lie about salary to an employee. But that is not the same as a nanny quitting a job w/out the agreed upon time since a judge cannot order a nanny to perform labor services or pay for hours she didn't work. We are all comparing apples to oranges here. An employer can be sued for not paying what was not agreed upon upon acceptance of a job, yet a nanny cannot be sued for leaving a job before a certain time, even if a contract was signed. "At will" applies to both sides, if either side decides they no longer can work together, each had the right to leave unless malice or retribution is involved. If anyone on here can post a link on here where a former nanny was successfully sued in a court of law, I will eat crow.[/quote] Sweetheart, "at will" is simply the default designation. You are at will until you are designated as something else. It depends on the actual terms of your contract, but you can give up that at will designation and become a contract term employee, subject to certain termination terms. For example, my contract requires 30 days of notice or severence unless I am found guilty of a crime, fail to perform my contracted duties, or put the children in danger. I am required to give 30 days of notice unless the parents break the terms of the contract, are over a week late with my paycheck, or they fail to provide a safe work environment. It also states what my responsibility will be if I fail to give that notice (I forfeit the right to payment of unused but accrued leave). At will employment is all well and good, but it can be in a nanny's best interest to actually set terms regarding termination, and there is no reason this can't be done. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics