Reply to No more OT

Forum Index » General Discussion

Reply to "No more OT"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]I think the family should have presented it as a pay cut instead of coming across as trying to illegally avoid OT. 
There is no benefit whatsoever to the nanny in accepting this position, they clearly want her to still pay taxes but avoid their own. I can understand not being able to afford your childcare any longer but $15 for three children is very low end.[/quote]

I agree with you that the parents should have presented this as pay cut but disagree on the other points.

1. The nanny is being given right of first refusal. She may or may not find a job that pays 1000+ an hour, In this area those jobs are few and far between. 
2. The kids are 4,6, and 8. These are school age kids so $15 average an hour is not on the low side. They can definitely find a cheaper nanny/housekeeper. 
3. This has nothing to do with taxes. The employer and employee are still paying the same proportions of taxes. Taxes are based are on gross amounts for both employee and employer.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics