Reply to NYT Article on Nanny Compensation

Forum Index » General Discussion

Reply to "NYT Article on Nanny Compensation "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Employment and salary is based on a market of supply and demand. People who have money try to pay the least to get the most. That is a fact of how capitalism works and it is indeed standard and right. If you want someone to give you money so you can have a better life when you haven't done anything to earn it, then you need to find charity, not a job. If you are not happy with that system, [b]you need to go live in a socialist country, like North Korea where they pay everyone about the same.[/b][/quote]

You are embarrassing yourself here. I'd recommend you refrain from referencing foreign dictatorships until you've done some research.

I'm a well-paid, legal nanny with a BA from a top-10 school, five years of teaching experience, multi-lingual, qualified in several other fields, and I have both job satisfaction and great benefits as a nanny. So...yes, I'd say on that point you're correct - the supply and demand is working out well for me, just as it is for many other nannies. This argument that nannies should do more to improve themselves if they want to earn more[b] is too inane to be offensive[/b] - do you really want the least educated, least intelligent, least ambitious person helping to raise your children? Or do you want to hire someone whose intellectual, academic, social, and emotional skills are on par with your own? If it's the latter, you'll pay a little more. If that's irrelevant to you, by all means, offer less - it's your choice, just like it's my choice to be a nanny. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Learn to use words like inane before you talk about how you got a BA from a top-10 school.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics