Reply to Hidden camera detector

Forum Index » General Discussion

Reply to "Hidden camera detector"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Most jobs have camera's. At my job they are clearly in the office and no one thinks twice. Assume they are there or find another job.

Why does this have to continually be said? It is NOT the same. At your job, is there only one person who knows where the cameras are? Is there only one person allowed to review the footage? Are there no protocols for viewing the footage and what actions are taken if something isn't right? If it is learned that someone is being inappropriate with the cameras, are you comfortable in knowing that said person will be severely punished? A nanny being secretly filmed by her employer has none of these protections. Her employer could put a camera anywhere, and she wouldn't know. They could do whatever they like with the footage, and she will likely never know. They could misconstrue the footage, and fire her without warning or reason. And finally even if she does find out about inappropriate use of the cameras, the justice process would be long, expensive, and even with the best of outcomes, still leaves HER the victim out of a job. Don't secretly tape your nanny. It's messed up.

Don't do anything inappropriate and you won't have anything to worry about.

That's what you gleaned from my post? You can't address any of my actual points? I gave you plenty of reason why a great nanny with half a brain might be leery of SECRET cameras. If you're not transparent, I can't trust you.[/quote]

NP here. You are quite the uninformed drama queen, PP. Let's educate you.

[b]At your job, is there only one person who knows where the cameras are? 
[/b]No. There are many people who know where the cameras are at. Any of these people have access to the feed. Your point?

[b]Is there only one person allowed to review the footage?[/b] No. There are several people who can have access to the footage. Sounds like my situation is a lot scarier than yours.

[b]Are there no protocols for viewing the footage and what actions are taken if something isn't right? [/b]There are a few protocols, but not many. There are no actions taken "if something isn't right". The footage stands on its own. If I have an issue with it, we litigate.

[b]If it is learned that someone is being inappropriate with the cameras, are you comfortable in knowing that said person will be severely punished?[/b] This is laughable. No one is severely punished if you don't like how they use the footage.

You really are pretty stupid, PP.[/quote]

So you illustrate exactly my point with your answers (in an office setting no one person has complete control over the cameras and footage and everyone is subject to answer to someone else) and

then you call me stupid? People who need to lower themselves to name calling are typically those unable to make a sound argument. [b]But continue displaying your "intellect" while calling me names.[/quote][/b]

The PP lost the argument.  As any one who has ever been involved in debate knows, reducing your argument to name calling is the first sign you have nothing left to say. In other words, are out of the debate.  So you win, OP. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics