Reply to Live-in Nanny Rates/Questions

Forum Index » Employer Issues

Reply to "Live-in Nanny Rates/Questions"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I worked for four different families as a live-in nanny and have never been asked to pay rent.  $16 an hour is a good starting rate for an experienced live-in nanny.  If you don't mind someone less experienced, you can pay her less an hour.  But no, you do not charge for rent. [/quote]

OP, $16 an hour can be a good starting rate for an experienced live-OUT nanny.  There is a lot of disagreement on this board about whether or not you should offer a lower amount to a live-in as compared to a live-out.  There are some very vocal nannies who feel that the rate should be the same for two reasons: (1) to make the offer more attractive to a nanny who is living with her boss and sharing public spaces in the house; and (2) because the employer wants a live-in for "flexibility" reasons (someone can clarify what they mean by that because I've never understood what that means as a benefit compared to live-out nannies).

Personally, from an employer perspective, anyone who I've ever known to be looking for a live-in nanny sees the major benefit as being hourly rate savings as compared to a live-out.  I'm sure they are out there, but it seems like most employers would prefer a live-out, but need/want to save money and so are looking for a live-in.  These employers see it as more of an inconvenience to live with someone, but that the savings would be worth it.

Are there any employers out there who would be happy to pay a live-in nanny the same rate as a live-out?  I haven't heard from this person yet on what the major benefits of a live-in nanny are that make up for the fact that not only are you paying someone the same rate, but also providing living space.

Also, if you've had au pairs, you probably want to do some looking into on what will be different.  Do you pay for phone, car, food for a live-in like you would for an au pair?  Does the live-in want to be like a member of the family or do they want to be left alone when off duty?  You probably lose the flexibility in the schedule that you've had with the au pair too.  Things to consider.

[/quote]

I'm not one of the vocal nannies you are referring to, but there are lots of reasons a family may choose a live-in over a live out beyond the savings.

-The parent(s) work odd or unpredictable hours
-The job requires exceptionally long/late hours 
-They have no family or close friends nearby and want someone available in case of emergencies or unforeseen needs
-They desire a long term, familial relationship with the caregiver of their children
-They have special/high needs children and need the extra hands
-They have money to burn and like having help at their fingertips

If the only reason a family wants a live-in is to save money, they really should look at other options, because as you said it is inconvenient inviting someone into your home if you don't truly want them there, but its no walk in the park for the nanny either. She shouldn't be paying for your inconvenience any more than you should pay for hers. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics