Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Discussion
Reply to "Let's be Clear"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Actually, nanny agreements, so long as they state the term of employment and terms of employment, are legally enforceable. Not disagreeing that some people abuse their employees, but people all over these boards say the agreements are not enforceable, when, if written properly, they absolutely are.[/quote] Is this you? When and where has any nanny housekeeping chores ever been "enforced" in a US Court of Law?[/quote] The minutia of employment contracts are rarely ever enforced for any job, especially with small employers. But PP is right that nanny agreements are legally enforceable, and are enforced through litigation (of course, generally in state courts, not a "US Court of Law," since there is no reason to think federal jurisdiction would attach). It's true that often people don't litigate, but that is not because the agreement is unenforceable. It is because the dispute is too small to justify the cost of taking someone to court. It's much cheaper to fire your nanny and hire a better one. It's also just generally silly to assert that an "agreement" is not a "contract." A contract is a bargained for exchange, aka an agreement in which both parties offer something. Sorry to disappoint, but really there is no special magic beyond that. The concept is complicated only by its own simplicity. [/quote] +1 Hurrah for reason! [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics