When adding a newborn to a 3 year old RSS feed

Anonymous
Is $1-2 more per hour reasonable? And that is for gross pay, right?
Anonymous
I really don't know anyone in their right mind who'd take on a newborn for an extra two bucks an hour. But good luck.
Anonymous
Yes, that is fine. And I'm in my right mind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes, that is fine. And I'm in my right mind.

But, not for you. Or are you available at some point?
Anonymous
Yes. That's what we gave our nanny when we had a baby.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes. That's what we gave our nanny when we had a baby.

How many newborns had she previously worked with?
Anonymous
I think that's pretty standard OP, and yes - adding to the gross pay, not net.

Also, it's fairly common for 3 yr olds to start going to some level of preschool so that can offset some of the additional work.

Anonymous
Yes, it's alright for me. I recieved 1.50
gross. And no I'm not available.
Anonymous
I meant I received $1.50 net.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's alright for me. I recieved 1.50
gross. And no I'm not available.

What a bargain! Have any friends?
nannydebsays

Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:I think that's pretty standard OP, and yes - adding to the gross pay, not net.

Also, it's fairly common for 3 yr olds to start going to some level of preschool so that can offset some of the additional work.



Yeah, because running the 3 yo to and from preschool 3 times a week is easy-peasy and preschools never have days off. And the 3 hours of the day the 3 yo is at school makes it even easier to get baby on a good schedule AND add household chores to make sure nanny stays busy! Because having 2 - 2.5 hours "free of caring for" the preschooler 3 days a week 35 - 40 weeks a year completely offsets the addition of an infant to the mix.

OP, are you paying nanny at or slightly above the market rate for a nanny with her education/experience? If so, $2 - $3 more gross per hour might work. If not, you need to offer a larger rate hike if you want to keep nanny.
Anonymous
nannydebsays wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think that's pretty standard OP, and yes - adding to the gross pay, not net.

Also, it's fairly common for 3 yr olds to start going to some level of preschool so that can offset some of the additional work.



Yeah, because running the 3 yo to and from preschool 3 times a week is easy-peasy and preschools never have days off. And the 3 hours of the day the 3 yo is at school makes it even easier to get baby on a good schedule AND add household chores to make sure nanny stays busy! Because having 2 - 2.5 hours "free of caring for" the preschooler 3 days a week 35 - 40 weeks a year completely offsets the addition of an infant to the mix.

OP, are you paying nanny at or slightly above the market rate for a nanny with her education/experience? If so, $2 - $3 more gross per hour might work. If not, you need to offer a larger rate hike if you want to keep nanny.

Exactly. Otherwise she can get a MUCH easier job for the same money, if she's smart.
Anonymous
nannydebsays wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think that's pretty standard OP, and yes - adding to the gross pay, not net.

Also, it's fairly common for 3 yr olds to start going to some level of preschool so that can offset some of the additional work.



Yeah, because running the 3 yo to and from preschool 3 times a week is easy-peasy and preschools never have days off. And the 3 hours of the day the 3 yo is at school makes it even easier to get baby on a good schedule AND add household chores to make sure nanny stays busy! Because having 2 - 2.5 hours "free of caring for" the preschooler 3 days a week 35 - 40 weeks a year completely offsets the addition of an infant to the mix.

OP, are you paying nanny at or slightly above the market rate for a nanny with her education/experience? If so, $2 - $3 more gross per hour might work. If not, you need to offer a larger rate hike if you want to keep nanny.


Um, this seems kind of a strong reaction from you Nanny Deb. I said "can offset some...work". I also said a $1-2 increase per hour - which is likely somewhere in the neighborhood of a 10-15% raise for someone earning $15-20/hr (which is the likely range in this market.) Seems reasonable and in line with what we usually hear on these boards.

I don't negate the impact of adding a baby to the workload, but I think that continued employment (assuming all parties are happy with the relationship), combined with a 10-15% raise, and potentially a few hours of relief from entertaining a preschooler, is a reasonable proposition to offer a valued nanny.
Anonymous
I'd be completely insulted with a $2 pay raise for a newborn. Unless they were poor, and that's the best they could do.
Anonymous
Nanny here. IMO $2/hr increase is fair, $2.50 or $3 is better. Less than $2/hr increase is less than fair, and most nannies would just leave (as others have said, they'll likely be able to find an easier job for the same pay).
post reply Forum Index » Employer Issues
Message Quick Reply
Go to: