| What's the going rate for a pay increase for a second child? Kids will be 2 years apart, if that matters. |
| Half of what you are paying now. Two kids both under two. |
|
When my nanny family had a second child, there was no way
they were going to increase my by by $400 a week. |
Hahahahaha! In real life, $1-$2/hr, depending on how well you're paying her now. Pay her what you would hire a new nanny for two children, plus any raises she's already earned. So, if a nanny for one kid starts at $16-$18, and two kids starts at $18-$20, there's no way it makes sense to pay her another $8-$10/hr. |
| We raised the hourly rate by $1. |
This |
| The easy answer is the rate the nanny requests in order to stay with your family. PP said it best - the difference in the rate for one child versus two children. And it isn't $1! $2-3/hour, maybe. |
|
Somewhere on this forum, a pediatrician said $5 increase per hour, considering the additional workload and responsibility.
|
This - $1 increase for the responsibility of another baby!? Please people, consider just for a moment all the attention and care that your first kid required and tell me that you think $1 increase is fair! SMH |
| Doesn't matter what is right, fair or responsible - generally the rate is $2 an hour (at least it is here in Los Angeles). |
| We have our nanny $3. She was making $18, she is now making $21 for two children. |
|
What kind of parent would give such a measly raise of $1.00 for the addition of an extra child!!
And a baby no less!! This is the most perfect method to insult a Nanny. |
| No one in their right mind takes on the enormous responsibility of an infant for $1-2/hr., unless they don't understand what's required. An increase of $4-6/hr. is appropriate. |
This. |
No, not here in the DC area, unless you're irresponsible or really poor. |