Nannies are employees per the irs. W2 only. |
Better report the INA to the IRS. Pronto! |
Most of the time, but certainly not always. Let's be honest. |
Ina specifically states on their page that they don't care what the status is of their members. Sorry, obviously they don't care. |
I'm always honest. IRS has their rules, you can disregard at your own peril. |
Good. Where have they stated that a nanny can never be an independent contractor, specifically specialty nannies who meet the IRS requirements for an independent contractor? |
Very few nannies meet the requirements to be an independent contractor. Most nannies are employees. And a family that wants a nanny to accept a 1099 wants a nanny who will help them break the law. |
That has almost nothing to do with it. It does not matter how much control the parents actually exercise, it matters that they have the right to exercise it. Very few parents allow a nanny to set her own hours, use all her own equipment, decide what food to feed their child, etc. The parents might allow you to make many decisions based on your experience, but you're still an employee. |
True that "very few nannies meet the requirements to be an independent contractor". But you're FINALLY conceding that certain nannies are independent contractors. Thank you. |
| if a family is trying to give you a 1099 they are trying to avoid paying the employer share of the tax contribution (social security and medicare). instead of paying 7.65% of your income, you will be paying 15% of your income for social security and medicare alone (FICA). nannies are domestic employees and if you aren't provided with a W2 you should do your due diligence and report them to the IRS. |
| Just tell the family you want a W-2. Done. |
WHY DO YOU KEEP GOING ON ABOUT THE INA???? They don't hire or pay any nanny. WTF would we need to report them to the IRS? Most nannies are employees as defined by the IRS. There are not many "speciality nannies" that attend the INA conference who are independent contractors. The fact that you keep saying this shows me that you've never been to an INA conference because it's simply not true. It's rare for a regular nanny to not meet the definition set by the IRS. Even in the newborn care specialist world, many people have started to pay as employers in order to cover themselves. |
You know there are multiple people responding to you, right? |
|
Lawyer here. IRS has clear guidance on household employees. Anyone performing typical Manny duties as the OP is likely performing would be an employer, not an independent contractor. INA membership does not control employee classifications. I'm a member of the state bar association but I could certainly be an undiscovered tax cheat. It's not a professional association's job to determine appropriate employment status.
INA poster: go ahead and call the INA and ask them to confirm for you (give you legal and tax advice) that you should be classified as an independent contractor. They won't. You're wrong. OP: require a W-2 and classification as an employee. |
| Oops - Manny should have been nanny, but same goes for Manny duties as well! |