Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

The accusation is a farce and was discredited by Biden’s FBI. I’m wondering where all you people screaming “release the files” were during Biden’s term. I searched for a thread on here with people insisting the files be released and I couldn’t find it. Hmmmm…..

No Democrat cared because this was not a 'thing'. Remember, Trump was the one who mentioned this on the campaign trail. It was a Republican who showed up at the Pizza place ready to kill people. This is a story that was a main item for Maga. Bandino, Bondi, and Patel where all going on podcasts talking about this. So stop with the "Biden's FBI". Trump can't stop talking. If those 4 people didn't mention it...it would not be an issue today. This was started by Maga, but will be finished by Democrates

This is coming from an ex-Republican who can't stand the vitrol, double standards, and anger that is coming from Maga.

What in the hell do you mean that it wasn’t “ a thing?” This has been going on for YEARS. Democrats couldn’t care less about the files or the VICTIMS while Biden was president. Why not? If you want to talk double standards let’s talk about the fact that there were no calls on the left to release the files and it took Trump and his DOJ and FBI to bring any sunlight to this case.

False...the DOJ had numerous investigations ongoing under Biden, which is why he didn't 'release the files" - then trump ended those investigations (why????) and moved Maxwell to a Club Fed and still hasn't released the files, even though he shows up tens of thousands of times and was a "beauty pagent' owner and so on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

that doesn't "vindicate" Trump. It just means Clinton was not close enough to the situation to know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

The accusation is a farce and was discredited by Biden’s FBI. I’m wondering where all you people screaming “release the files” were during Biden’s term. I searched for a thread on here with people insisting the files be released and I couldn’t find it. Hmmmm…..

No Democrat cared because this was not a 'thing'. Remember, Trump was the one who mentioned this on the campaign trail. It was a Republican who showed up at the Pizza place ready to kill people. This is a story that was a main item for Maga. Bandino, Bondi, and Patel where all going on podcasts talking about this. So stop with the "Biden's FBI". Trump can't stop talking. If those 4 people didn't mention it...it would not be an issue today. This was started by Maga, but will be finished by Democrates

This is coming from an ex-Republican who can't stand the vitrol, double standards, and anger that is coming from Maga.

What in the hell do you mean that it wasn’t “ a thing?” This has been going on for YEARS. Democrats couldn’t care less about the files or the VICTIMS while Biden was president. Why not? If you want to talk double standards let’s talk about the fact that there were no calls on the left to release the files and it took Trump and his DOJ and FBI to bring any sunlight to this case.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am sure Bill Clinton was more than happy to revel in the company of young adult women. I'm guessing, since he's intelligent and a former President, and therefore knew he had a lot to lose, that he was probably careful not to get involved with women who looked as if they might be minors. So I can give him all that. I can also believe he didn't see Trump doing anything he shouldn't have done - which is easy, since I don't think they were both with Epstein at the same time.

But saying he saw nothing untoward around Epstein? Hmmm. I think he's playing with words here. When you see a middle aged man surrounded by a gaggle of barely adult women, that is not a sign that everything's on the up and up. But Clinton is a womanizer, so...

All in all, nothing criminal to pin on the guy, but we know he's done some shoddy things to 20 year olds.

On to the next President!

+1 to all of this. Well summarized.

Anonymous wrote:I am sure Bill Clinton was more than happy to revel in the company of young adult women. I'm guessing, since he's intelligent and a former President, and therefore knew he had a lot to lose, that he was probably careful not to get involved with women who looked as if they might be minors. So I can give him all that. I can also believe he didn't see Trump doing anything he shouldn't have done - which is easy, since I don't think they were both with Epstein at the same time.

But saying he saw nothing untoward around Epstein? Hmmm. I think he's playing with words here. When you see a middle aged man surrounded by a gaggle of barely adult women, that is not a sign that everything's on the up and up. But Clinton is a womanizer, so...

All in all, nothing criminal to pin on the guy, but we know he's done some shoddy things to 20 year olds.

On to the next President!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

The accusations against Trump that were supposedly covered up in the Epstein Files relates to a "Jane Doe" accuser who claimed in 2019 to have been drugged and raped by Epstein in South Carolina, in the 1980s, when she was 13 years old. There's no evidence that Epstein ever resided or vacationed in South Carolina, nor that he ever plied anyone with drugs -- he was known to abstain entirely from drugs and alcohol, and prohibited it in his presence.

More relevantly, the lawsuit was brought by Lisa Bloom, who previously made fraudulent rape claims against Trump, namely the "Katie Johnson" lawsuit in 2016, which was a publicity stunt cooked up by a former Jerry Springer show producer, alleging that Trump and Epstein violently gang-raped a 13-year-old girl in the 1990s. It was subsequently exposed as a total hoax: x.com/mtracey/status…

I spoke to Mark Epstein, who said he had never heard of his brother summering in South Carolina in the early 80s for several summers, and he said there's no way he wouldn't have known that.

There are so many problems with this woman's story--it reads as lurid, fantastical, improbable, and contains many glaring details that do not fit Epstein's MO. But most notably there is no record or any indication that Epstein summered in Hilton Head, SC for several summers. He spent the early 80s in Sweden, London, New York, but we are supposed to believe he rented a middle class condo in HHI and no one knew about it then or now?

The account has no corroboration, she first had the idea that the man who abused her was Epstein after her friend suggested it to her once Epstein was in the news in 2019, she was rejected from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program which is a major red flag, and she was repped by Lisa Bloom, who also worked with the discredited "Katie Johnson" Epstein/Trump accuser. The SC woman's story has Epstein speaking in foreign languages, cuck chairs, anal rape, uttering movie lines like "this won't end well for you" and "fresh meat," she seems surprised by what Epstein looks like in photos shown to her, and so on.

If anyone read that FBI interview and it didn't raise red flags, there might be a bias problem. I can't believe the Dems hitched their wagon to this.

There are 3 separate allegations of Trump sexually assaulting 13 and 14 year olds. We don’t actually know which if any of these are “Katie Johnson.” These allegations were also found to be credible by the FBI and they were interviewed multiple times.

If the information exonerates Trump, he can just… release the information. If the FBI did an investigation, there will be a report. Release that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This was the obvious answer since he claims he didn’t know what Epstein was doing. He is still smart enough to give the answers that will keep himself out of trouble.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the Clintons commit a crime according to the released files?

Apparently not.

However, the DOJ has covered up accusations that Trump SA-ed 2 children.

One of these is a bigger deal than the other…

The accusations against Trump that were supposedly covered up in the Epstein Files relates to a "Jane Doe" accuser who claimed in 2019 to have been drugged and raped by Epstein in South Carolina, in the 1980s, when she was 13 years old. There's no evidence that Epstein ever resided or vacationed in South Carolina, nor that he ever plied anyone with drugs -- he was known to abstain entirely from drugs and alcohol, and prohibited it in his presence.

More relevantly, the lawsuit was brought by Lisa Bloom, who previously made fraudulent rape claims against Trump, namely the "Katie Johnson" lawsuit in 2016, which was a publicity stunt cooked up by a former Jerry Springer show producer, alleging that Trump and Epstein violently gang-raped a 13-year-old girl in the 1990s. It was subsequently exposed as a total hoax: x.com/mtracey/status…

I spoke to Mark Epstein, who said he had never heard of his brother summering in South Carolina in the early 80s for several summers, and he said there's no way he wouldn't have known that.

There are so many problems with this woman's story--it reads as lurid, fantastical, improbable, and contains many glaring details that do not fit Epstein's MO. But most notably there is no record or any indication that Epstein summered in Hilton Head, SC for several summers. He spent the early 80s in Sweden, London, New York, but we are supposed to believe he rented a middle class condo in HHI and no one knew about it then or now?

The account has no corroboration, she first had the idea that the man who abused her was Epstein after her friend suggested it to her once Epstein was in the news in 2019, she was rejected from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program which is a major red flag, and she was repped by Lisa Bloom, who also worked with the discredited "Katie Johnson" Epstein/Trump accuser. The SC woman's story has Epstein speaking in foreign languages, cuck chairs, anal rape, uttering movie lines like "this won't end well for you" and "fresh meat," she seems surprised by what Epstein looks like in photos shown to her, and so on.

If anyone read that FBI interview and it didn't raise red flags, there might be a bias problem. I can't believe the Dems hitched their wagon to this.

Anonymous wrote: