Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I loathe Trump with every fiber of my being, but of course I don’t want to find out that these girls were raped or assaulted by him. Why would I want that? Even if I was some kind of sicko who was rooting for rape just for the political advantage, I wouldn’t do so in this case. Why? Because it wouldn’t change anyone’s mind. He has already been proven to be a repulsive criminal on so many levels. People who still support him would not change their mind if he was implicated in this. He said it himself - he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and wouldn’t lose his supporters.
This is one of the hottest garbage takes I’ve ever read, congratulations. “I don’t care if it happened, I just don’t want to know, let me keep my head in the sand” is a moronic take.
Moronic interpretation of my take. If it happened, I want to know. But I am not hoping that there are even more girls who have been victimized by him. Hoping for anyone to be guilty of rape is hoping that someone has been raped.
We already know he is a rapist, predator, pedophile. Judging from the footage we have seen of him with Epstein, it is hard to believe that he was innocent in all of this. But that doesn’t mean that I hope he is guilty.
Do you hope he is guilty? I am not asking if you think he is guilty. I am asking if you hope he is guilty. If so, get help.
Wait, I just reread my post and can see where it came across that way. :oops: That’s not what I meant, and I hope my reply clarified.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and the times Trump was mentioned he was shown he never met or got involved.Anonymous wrote:This is so hilarious Dems think this is a 'gotcha' for Trump. Trump appears in the list 4 times, which is almost the same as ::drumroll:: celebrities like Tony Hawk. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton appears over 70+ times and one survivor of the abuse already is quoted as saying"Clinton liked 'em young".
Clinton goes along with sick liberal Democrats in Hollyweird throughout the decades who abused kids and are pedos. There is something sick in liberal Democrats' brains.
But we do know Clinton “liked them young”
OMG. How disgusted [sic] do you think Hillary was when she read that?????????????????????
Anonymous wrote:and the times Trump was mentioned he was shown he never met or got involved.Anonymous wrote:This is so hilarious Dems think this is a 'gotcha' for Trump. Trump appears in the list 4 times, which is almost the same as ::drumroll:: celebrities like Tony Hawk. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton appears over 70+ times and one survivor of the abuse already is quoted as saying"Clinton liked 'em young".
Clinton goes along with sick liberal Democrats in Hollyweird throughout the decades who abused kids and are pedos. There is something sick in liberal Democrats' brains.
But we do know Clinton “liked them young”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Trump is a rapist.
No, he is not.
And, whoever posted the X posting above should be ashamed. Do your research, pp.
Yes he is, as determined by a federal judge last year. Keep up, another trial about this starts next week.
An activist judge. The jury that heard the case did NOT find him guilty of rape. The judge declared it so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Trump is a rapist.
No, he is not.
And, whoever posted the X posting above should be ashamed. Do your research, pp.
Yes he is, as determined by a federal judge last year. Keep up, another trial about this starts next week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Trump is a rapist.
No, he is not.
And, whoever posted the X posting above should be ashamed. Do your research, pp.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I loathe Trump with every fiber of my being, but of course I don’t want to find out that these girls were raped or assaulted by him. Why would I want that? Even if I was some kind of sicko who was rooting for rape just for the political advantage, I wouldn’t do so in this case. Why? Because it wouldn’t change anyone’s mind. He has already been proven to be a repulsive criminal on so many levels. People who still support him would not change their mind if he was implicated in this. He said it himself - he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and wouldn’t lose his supporters.
This is one of the hottest garbage takes I’ve ever read, congratulations. “I don’t care if it happened, I just don’t want to know, let me keep my head in the sand” is a moronic take.
Moronic interpretation of my take. If it happened, I want to know. But I am not hoping that there are even more girls who have been victimized by him. Hoping for anyone to be guilty of rape is hoping that someone has been raped.
We already know he is a rapist, predator, pedophile. Judging from the footage we have seen of him with Epstein, it is hard to believe that he was innocent in all of this. But that doesn’t mean that I hope he is guilty.
Do you hope he is guilty? I am not asking if you think he is guilty. I am asking if you hope he is guilty. If so, get help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I loathe Trump with every fiber of my being, but of course I don’t want to find out that these girls were raped or assaulted by him. Why would I want that? Even if I was some kind of sicko who was rooting for rape just for the political advantage, I wouldn’t do so in this case. Why? Because it wouldn’t change anyone’s mind. He has already been proven to be a repulsive criminal on so many levels. People who still support him would not change their mind if he was implicated in this. He said it himself - he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and wouldn’t lose his supporters.
This is one of the hottest garbage takes I’ve ever read, congratulations. “I don’t care if it happened, I just don’t want to know, let me keep my head in the sand” is a moronic take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Trump is a rapist.
No, he is not.
And, whoever posted the X posting above should be ashamed. Do your research, pp.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Trump is a rapist.
Anonymous wrote:
Love the Community Note here.
This case was dropped by the supposed "plaintiff." There are questions as to whether a plaintiff actually existed.
The Guardian has a story on this dubious case published in 2016. If the Guardian is skeptical of the claims, you know it is a phony deal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
Anonymous wrote:I loathe Trump with every fiber of my being, but of course I don’t want to find out that these girls were raped or assaulted by him. Why would I want that? Even if I was some kind of sicko who was rooting for rape just for the political advantage, I wouldn’t do so in this case. Why? Because it wouldn’t change anyone’s mind. He has already been proven to be a repulsive criminal on so many levels. People who still support him would not change their mind if he was implicated in this. He said it himself - he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and wouldn’t lose his supporters.