Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting fact. Georgetown allowed usage of their courts to hold a USTA tennis tournament a few years back to benefit a Wounded Warrior charity. I remember seeing one kid that was on G-town tennis team and participated in the tournament. He was definitely not a DI tennis material. I was kind of shocked by how bad he was and was told he was at the bottom of G-town roster. All G-town male tennis players didn’t show up for next round, so I wonder if this kid was one of the “bribe” kids. I am sure this been going on for years and more is yet to come.
No. These kids are called GPA booster kids. They have really high GPAs, they bring up the team GPS, they travel with the team and they get all the cool internships.
another way to play the system.
There are legitimate walk-ons on college teams or "lesser athletes" who are brought into the team by the coach. They're not necessarily "fraud" kids.
Why are you mad at the kids? Who made the rules about GPAs on athletic teams? NCAA? The college? Not the athletes.
Hate the game, not the players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The one family paid $250k to get their son into USC and then he withdrew after one year.
Which family?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no comparison of this fraud to Development Admits or AA admits.
So, can you people arguing that go somewhere else or stay on topic please?
It's all being lumped together. The push is already on that any preference = bad.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/12/18262037/college-admissions-scandal-felicity-huffman
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, one point of clarification on the crew/athletics front.
The kids never turned up for crew. So there was no oversight, and no coach or AD to notice the student was not "built like a rower" or whatever.
The "recruited athlete" piece was ONLY for admissions, to get the bar low enough that these kids could cross it.
Which, if you think about it, is amazing. These students had literally every educational and social privilege possible. Prestigious PK-12 private schools, essay coaches, admissions advisors, test tutors - and they still needed a lower bar to get into college.
That's shocking when you look at it.
These are kids who should have started at community college and lived at home. Their parents' egos couldn't accept that reality.
This scandal is so much more about the parents than it is about the kids. It's all about "saving face" for the parents among their peer group.
You can bribe your kid's way into Yale or Georgetown. But if he's not smart, he's not going to be successful at a hedge fund or law firm. In fact, your mediocre sum will become a ripe target for the much smarter and morally devoid individuals who travel in those circles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, one point of clarification on the crew/athletics front.
The kids never turned up for crew. So there was no oversight, and no coach or AD to notice the student was not "built like a rower" or whatever.
The "recruited athlete" piece was ONLY for admissions, to get the bar low enough that these kids could cross it.
Which, if you think about it, is amazing. These students had literally every educational and social privilege possible. Prestigious PK-12 private schools, essay coaches, admissions advisors, test tutors - and they still needed a lower bar to get into college.
That's shocking when you look at it.
These are kids who should have started at community college and lived at home. Their parents' egos couldn't accept that reality.
This scandal is so much more about the parents than it is about the kids. It's all about "saving face" for the parents among their peer group.
You can bribe your kid's way into Yale or Georgetown. But if he's not smart, he's not going to be successful at a hedge fund or law firm. In fact, your mediocre sum will become a ripe target for the much smarter and morally devoid individuals who travel in those circles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting fact. Georgetown allowed usage of their courts to hold a USTA tennis tournament a few years back to benefit a Wounded Warrior charity. I remember seeing one kid that was on G-town tennis team and participated in the tournament. He was definitely not a DI tennis material. I was kind of shocked by how bad he was and was told he was at the bottom of G-town roster. All G-town male tennis players didn’t show up for next round, so I wonder if this kid was one of the “bribe” kids. I am sure this been going on for years and more is yet to come.
No. These kids are called GPA booster kids. They have really high GPAs, they bring up the team GPS, they travel with the team and they get all the cool internships.
another way to play the system.
Anonymous wrote:So, one point of clarification on the crew/athletics front.
The kids never turned up for crew. So there was no oversight, and no coach or AD to notice the student was not "built like a rower" or whatever.
The "recruited athlete" piece was ONLY for admissions, to get the bar low enough that these kids could cross it.
Which, if you think about it, is amazing. These students had literally every educational and social privilege possible. Prestigious PK-12 private schools, essay coaches, admissions advisors, test tutors - and they still needed a lower bar to get into college.
That's shocking when you look at it.
Anonymous wrote:So, one point of clarification on the crew/athletics front.
The kids never turned up for crew. So there was no oversight, and no coach or AD to notice the student was not "built like a rower" or whatever.
The "recruited athlete" piece was ONLY for admissions, to get the bar low enough that these kids could cross it.
Which, if you think about it, is amazing. These students had literally every educational and social privilege possible. Prestigious PK-12 private schools, essay coaches, admissions advisors, test tutors - and they still needed a lower bar to get into college.
That's shocking when you look at it.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting fact. Georgetown allowed usage of their courts to hold a USTA tennis tournament a few years back to benefit a Wounded Warrior charity. I remember seeing one kid that was on G-town tennis team and participated in the tournament. He was definitely not a DI tennis material. I was kind of shocked by how bad he was and was told he was at the bottom of G-town roster. All G-town male tennis players didn’t show up for next round, so I wonder if this kid was one of the “bribe” kids. I am sure this been going on for years and more is yet to come.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting fact. Georgetown allowed usage of their courts to hold a USTA tennis tournament a few years back to benefit a Wounded Warrior charity. I remember seeing one kid that was on G-town tennis team and participated in the tournament. He was definitely not a DI tennis material. I was kind of shocked by how bad he was and was told he was at the bottom of G-town roster. All G-town male tennis players didn’t show up for next round, so I wonder if this kid was one of the “bribe” kids. I am sure this been going on for years and more is yet to come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no comparison of this fraud to Development Admits or AA admits.
So, can you people arguing that go somewhere else or stay on topic please?
It's all being lumped together. The push is already on that any preference = bad.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/12/18262037/college-admissions-scandal-felicity-huffman
I know it is being lumped together. By the ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The one family paid $250k to get their son into USC and then he withdrew after one year.
I know a family that paid $250K for private school K-12 and their son ended up going to WVU.
I know a family that paid $250K for private high school and their daughter ended up at Coastal Carolina.