Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/pearson-pays-77-million-in-common-core-settlement/2013/12/13/77515bba-6423-11e3-aa81-e1dab1360323_story.html
One more time: follow the money
One more time: where are we supposed to follow the money to, and what are we supposed to think when we get there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/pearson-pays-77-million-in-common-core-settlement/2013/12/13/77515bba-6423-11e3-aa81-e1dab1360323_story.html
One more time: follow the money
One more time: where are we supposed to follow the money to, and what are we supposed to think when we get there?
Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/pearson-pays-77-million-in-common-core-settlement/2013/12/13/77515bba-6423-11e3-aa81-e1dab1360323_story.html
One more time: follow the money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Which means the state is keeping them out of the loop? That would mean one of two things: That the state is corrupt or the state is incompetent. You can't possibly be suggesting the teachers are incompetent?
I can't imagine, that, given the man's position as head of the union, he would put himself in a position of not knowing how NY is educating the children.
No, not that the state is keeping them out of the loop -- everything is public knowledge. But they aren't going out of their way to state that the New York State standards listen on the EngageNY website modules are above and beyond what is required by Common Core.
When it comes to the debates around the Common Core State Standards and how best to educate our children, I have a unique perspective: I am a parent of school-aged children, a high school English teacher, and an adjunct college instructor. Every day, through these lenses, I am reminded of how important the Common Core standards are to our students. I’ve seen and experienced the effects of the implementation of the Common Core here in New York, and for me, it’s all added up to a clear picture: the Common Core State Standards mean a better present and a better future for our children.
Anonymous wrote:
Which means the state is keeping them out of the loop? That would mean one of two things: That the state is corrupt or the state is incompetent. You can't possibly be suggesting the teachers are incompetent?
I can't imagine, that, given the man's position as head of the union, he would put himself in a position of not knowing how NY is educating the children.
Anonymous wrote:Keeping in mind that the Common Core standards did not cause this problem, and that getting rid of the Common Core standards will not solve it.
You must be new here. Don't you know that Common Core is the panacea for all that is wrong in education in the United States? That's what they are saying.
Keeping in mind that the Common Core standards did not cause this problem, and that getting rid of the Common Core standards will not solve it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You despise the Common Core standards because there are things on the standardized tests aligned to the Common Core standards that an individual child or class might not (yet) have been taught, and but the child(ren) have to take the test anyway?
Do you think that this is a problem unique to the Common Core standards? It's not. It's true for any standardized test, anywhere, ever.
I think the teacher's point was that these kids had not been taught much of anything on the test. Would you like to sit for a test in a language you do not speak?
Yes, exactly! Kids working at a third grade level forced to take 7th grade tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/05/04/today-was-the-first-day-i-was-ever-ashamed-to-be-a-teacher/?tid=HP_more
I'm not sure this woman has ever said something positive about CC.
Also no mention of how NY has additional standards, and how the implementation could be a factor. Just more CC bashing.
Can you explain why teachers don't know the difference?
That's not what I said. I'm in no position to generalize what teachers know and don't know.
His letter was actually pretty specific to NY and called out NY administrators only. But Valerie Strauss could have provided come context. The byline on the front page says he is "speaking out on Common Core." He was really speaking out on the NY test.
He specifically said Common Core in his letter. If you follow the link, there is another letter from other teachers that also specifically reference Common Core. So again, why do the NY teachers not know of the additional NY standards? Or more telling, what do they know that we don't?
I think they just think what they are doing IS Common Core, that the test the kids are taking is the "Common Core" test. They don't realize that their state has gone above and beyond the requirements of Common Core State Standards.
Anonymous wrote:You despise the Common Core standards because there are things on the standardized tests aligned to the Common Core standards that an individual child or class might not (yet) have been taught, and but the child(ren) have to take the test anyway?
Do you think that this is a problem unique to the Common Core standards? It's not. It's true for any standardized test, anywhere, ever.
I think the teacher's point was that these kids had not been taught much of anything on the test. Would you like to sit for a test in a language you do not speak?