Anonymous wrote:No proof of life provided, sadly she’s probably gone.

Anonymous wrote:Savannah just posted another Instagram video talking to the writer of the ransom note. The wording is so effing creepy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A CNA or nurse or house cleaner who comes in to help on a regular basis would know where the Apple Watch is kept. My guess is it’s someone connected to her like that.

Cna’s, nurses, housekeepers would never do this. They have too much to lose and do these jobs to feed their families not for funsies. They’re also predominately female jobs. This screams male crime

I agree it had to be someone who knows Nancy, possibly even a delivery person who would notice the ring camera. Clearly planned a head of time to take her.

The obvious suspect is the brother in law. He was last seen with her when he dropped her off at 10pm. He would know about the ring camera and the Apple Watch and all the other nuances. How would a delivery person know about that?

What’s there to actually know about the Apple Watch? I assume it was on its charger so stopped syncing when she got out of range.

How would a random perp know the Apple Watch belonged to her and not a grandchild or caretaker? How did they know to disable cameras and where they were located? This person is highly familiar with all of Nancy’s personal belongings and her home. It’s someone close to her not a stranger

You’re missing the point w/ the watch. They did nothing with the watch. The watch is sitting wherever Nancy put it (likely on a charger). It just stopped syncing when the pacemaker/she went out of range and since she didn’t return to range it never synced again. There was nothing for the perp to know about the watch

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A CNA or nurse or house cleaner who comes in to help on a regular basis would know where the Apple Watch is kept. My guess is it’s someone connected to her like that.

Cna’s, nurses, housekeepers would never do this. They have too much to lose and do these jobs to feed their families not for funsies. They’re also predominately female jobs. This screams male crime

I agree it had to be someone who knows Nancy, possibly even a delivery person who would notice the ring camera. Clearly planned a head of time to take her.

The obvious suspect is the brother in law. He was last seen with her when he dropped her off at 10pm. He would know about the ring camera and the Apple Watch and all the other nuances. How would a delivery person know about that?

What’s there to actually know about the Apple Watch? I assume it was on its charger so stopped syncing when she got out of range.

How would a random perp know the Apple Watch belonged to her and not a grandchild or caretaker? How did they know to disable cameras and where they were located? This person is highly familiar with all of Nancy’s personal belongings and her home. It’s someone close to her not a stranger

You’re missing the point w/ the watch. They did nothing with the watch. The watch is sitting wherever Nancy put it (likely on a charger). It just stopped syncing when the pacemaker/she went out of range and since she didn’t return to range it never synced again. There was nothing for the perp to know about the watch

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A CNA or nurse or house cleaner who comes in to help on a regular basis would know where the Apple Watch is kept. My guess is it’s someone connected to her like that.

Cna’s, nurses, housekeepers would never do this. They have too much to lose and do these jobs to feed their families not for funsies. They’re also predominately female jobs. This screams male crime

I agree it had to be someone who knows Nancy, possibly even a delivery person who would notice the ring camera. Clearly planned a head of time to take her.

The obvious suspect is the brother in law. He was last seen with her when he dropped her off at 10pm. He would know about the ring camera and the Apple Watch and all the other nuances. How would a delivery person know about that?

What’s there to actually know about the Apple Watch? I assume it was on its charger so stopped syncing when she got out of range.

How would a random perp know the Apple Watch belonged to her and not a grandchild or caretaker? How did they know to disable cameras and where they were located? This person is highly familiar with all of Nancy’s personal belongings and her home. It’s someone close to her not a stranger

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vehicle of interest possibly recorded at a Circle K.
https://nypost.com/2026/02/07/us-news/tucson-circle-k-turns-over-footage-in-nancy-guthrie-investigation-as-feds-eye-vehicle-of-interest/

I'm not super optimistic about the Circle K video -- seems like they are looking for any videos of any cars within a several mile radius between 1 and 3 a.m. But this article is the first time I've seen that a neighbor reported a suspicious white van (no markings) parked on her street earlier that week. Wonder if that's a rental van. I hope the police are checking that. I also think it's odd that there's a half hour break between when the front door camera is disconnected, and when the other camera records a figure . Maybe the perp unclipped the front door camera, then went to get the van to bring it to the front area.

I'm wondering if other traffic cameras captured a car near her neighborhood, and that vehicle is also on the Circle K camera. Could be nothing, but it could be a good lead if the footage from Circle K shows more detail / license plate.

Anonymous wrote:Her fp page shows she is NO fan of Trump. This is how we know her christian faith is real. Real christians find him revolting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vehicle of interest possibly recorded at a Circle K.
https://nypost.com/2026/02/07/us-news/tucson-circle-k-turns-over-footage-in-nancy-guthrie-investigation-as-feds-eye-vehicle-of-interest/

I'm not super optimistic about the Circle K video -- seems like they are looking for any videos of any cars within a several mile radius between 1 and 3 a.m. But this article is the first time I've seen that a neighbor reported a suspicious white van (no markings) parked on her street earlier that week. Wonder if that's a rental van. I hope the police are checking that. I also think it's odd that there's a half hour break between when the front door camera is disconnected, and when the other camera records a figure . Maybe the perp unclipped the front door camera, then went to get the van to bring it to the front area.

Anonymous wrote:Vehicle of interest possibly recorded at a Circle K.
https://nypost.com/2026/02/07/us-news/tucson-circle-k-turns-over-footage-in-nancy-guthrie-investigation-as-feds-eye-vehicle-of-interest/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It could be SIL with one of his band mates. Band mate has a rap sheet of burglary and embezzlement. I don’t think that they thought this case would have so much media attention. SG would just send the funds and then they would release NG. If it was them, then SIL took extra meds for her and she is fine. Might be hiding in Mexico while waiting for ransom to come in.

I don’t understand why people don’t think this case would not get much media attention. Savannah has hosted the opening ceremony and been a huge part of the Olympics for the last decade. She also has hosted presidential debates and anchored NBC coverage on election nights. These are events that get HUGE viewership around the country. she also hosted the Macy’s Thanksgiving parade which hundreds of millions of Americans have on in the background of their Thanksgiving preparations.

Most Americans are very familiar with Savannah Guthrie. She’s not as popular as Taylor Swift, but most Americans are going to know her and are going to be interested that her 84 year old mother was forcibly dragged from her home in the middle of the night.

Further, she hosts a national morning television show. Do you actually think that the today show wasn’t going to lead their coverage with our colleague’s Mom was kidnapped and taken from her home??!?!

Of course this was going to get national and sustained coverage. It was no surprise that the president called us out and offered her condolences.

No one with any common sense thought this wasn’t going to be a huge news story.

It was no surprise the president posted about it? Disagree. If anything this is one aspect highly suspect. When has he expressed sympathy for anyone? Hell he basically said Rob Reiner deserved to be murdered bc he didn’t support him politically.
I would have expected president to say nothing at all or call this fake news.

This is what I find suspicious also: you would expect Trump to save it served Guthrie right or something. Very out of character for him to express sympathy for anyone.

I disagree. My mother is MAGA and this story resonated with her. It scares seniors and therefore trump voters. And, did trump proactively issue a sympathetic statement? I don’t think so, he was asked about it by another reporter….because again it is big news that people are following, and said something.

Savannah is not exactly a hard hitting journalist. The Today Show does not really get into politics. The first 20 minutes is news, but they report on it quickly and move on, they don’t do commentary like morning Joe or anything and don’t share their opinions. Then they move onto light banter, weather, a lot of pop culture and feel good human interest stories, and basically repeat the same news stories at the 8 o’clock hour. I doubt Trump has a lot of angst about Savannah. I don’t recall him insulting her like other female journalists.

What, pray tell, does your MAGA mother have to do with anything? I would imagine all seniors have reason to be concerned not just your MAGA relative

Trump is inserting himself where he is likely to do considerable harm by announcing that there are clues. He should leave the investigation and dissemination of information to the professional law enforcement enforcement officers investigating the case.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-now-clues-very-144430382.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It could be SIL with one of his band mates. Band mate has a rap sheet of burglary and embezzlement. I don’t think that they thought this case would have so much media attention. SG would just send the funds and then they would release NG. If it was them, then SIL took extra meds for her and she is fine. Might be hiding in Mexico while waiting for ransom to come in.

I don’t understand why people don’t think this case would not get much media attention. Savannah has hosted the opening ceremony and been a huge part of the Olympics for the last decade. She also has hosted presidential debates and anchored NBC coverage on election nights. These are events that get HUGE viewership around the country. she also hosted the Macy’s Thanksgiving parade which hundreds of millions of Americans have on in the background of their Thanksgiving preparations.

Most Americans are very familiar with Savannah Guthrie. She’s not as popular as Taylor Swift, but most Americans are going to know her and are going to be interested that her 84 year old mother was forcibly dragged from her home in the middle of the night.

Further, she hosts a national morning television show. Do you actually think that the today show wasn’t going to lead their coverage with our colleague’s Mom was kidnapped and taken from her home??!?!

Of course this was going to get national and sustained coverage. It was no surprise that the president called us out and offered her condolences.

No one with any common sense thought this wasn’t going to be a huge news story.

It was no surprise the president posted about it? Disagree. If anything this is one aspect highly suspect. When has he expressed sympathy for anyone? Hell he basically said Rob Reiner deserved to be murdered bc he didn’t support him politically.
I would have expected president to say nothing at all or call this fake news.

This is what I find suspicious also: you would expect Trump to save it served Guthrie right or something. Very out of character for him to express sympathy for anyone.

I disagree. My mother is MAGA and this story resonated with her. It scares seniors and therefore trump voters. And, did trump proactively issue a sympathetic statement? I don’t think so, he was asked about it by another reporter….because again it is big news that people are following, and said something.

Savannah is not exactly a hard hitting journalist. The Today Show does not really get into politics. The first 20 minutes is news, but they report on it quickly and move on, they don’t do commentary like morning Joe or anything and don’t share their opinions. Then they move onto light banter, weather, a lot of pop culture and feel good human interest stories, and basically repeat the same news stories at the 8 o’clock hour. I doubt Trump has a lot of angst about Savannah. I don’t recall him insulting her like other female journalists.

What, pray tell, does your MAGA mother have to do with anything? I would imagine all seniors have reason to be concerned not just your MAGA relative

Trump is inserting himself where he is likely to do considerable harm by announcing that there are clues. He should leave the investigation and dissemination of information to the professional law enforcement enforcement officers investigating the case.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-now-clues-very-144430382.html

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know Nancy Guthrie’s political views, but she is clearly very much a woman of faith and that alone would give Trump impetus to be on the side of well wishing and appearing to put his hand on scale in terms of all federal resources directed to the case - even though they already were on the case, because FBI has jurisdiction over any suspected kidnapping by federal statute.

It’s easy positive points for Trump in a moment where he is racking up so much negative publicity that he really needs to balance things. He doesn’t give a crap about whether Nancy Guthrie lives or dies, it’s all a political calculus to him.