Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Looks like a great future! 79% of the jobs in this country are white collar, 9.7% are manufacturing. I guess Trump and republicans want to reverse that? WTF
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, I realize I’m looking for logic where there is none. But even if we accept the idea that the goal of these tariffs is to re-industrialize the US…and even if we accept that tariffs on foreign manufacturing might make companies re-invest in U.S. factories…
Then why the heck are we putting tariffs on bananas and coffee? We are never going to be able to grow these things at any scale in the US. It’s GOOD to import these things — it means we have them, when we otherwise wouldn’t.
Can someone help me find even a crappy rationale that someone *might* believe where this made sense?
It is a negotiation to get the other country to reduce its tariffs. If you place tariffs on things they don't export, they have no incentive to reduce tariffs.
How is it both a negotiating tactic, and also the mechanism to bring in $600 billion to offset tax breaks for millionaires? It can't be both.
And also apparently a means to re-shore manufacturing, which can’t happen when you wipe out the stock market and won’t happen when the policy changes from one day to the next.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Under Trump everyone will be working in a factory!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, 900 being laid off at Stellantis (maker of Jeeps) as direct consequence of Tariffs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/stellantis-pause-production-windsor-plant-layoff-900-workers-midwest/
The Stellantis and Whirlpool layoffs should be in the FAFO thread. I’m sure the majority of those workers voted for the Orangeman and his tariffs.
Stellantis shut down factories in Canada and Mexico.
Stellantis also laid off over 900 hundred employees across Indiana and Michigan. They reported it’s temporary until they figure out the impact of the tariffs from products made in Canada.
One of MANY companies laying off.
I work in clean energy, one of the few industries that brought manufacturing back to the US, is laying people off - all in red states.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, I realize I’m looking for logic where there is none. But even if we accept the idea that the goal of these tariffs is to re-industrialize the US…and even if we accept that tariffs on foreign manufacturing might make companies re-invest in U.S. factories…
Then why the heck are we putting tariffs on bananas and coffee? We are never going to be able to grow these things at any scale in the US. It’s GOOD to import these things — it means we have them, when we otherwise wouldn’t.
Can someone help me find even a crappy rationale that someone *might* believe where this made sense?
It is a negotiation to get the other country to reduce its tariffs. If you place tariffs on things they don't export, they have no incentive to reduce tariffs.
What’s wrong with most-favored nation status?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, I realize I’m looking for logic where there is none. But even if we accept the idea that the goal of these tariffs is to re-industrialize the US…and even if we accept that tariffs on foreign manufacturing might make companies re-invest in U.S. factories…
Then why the heck are we putting tariffs on bananas and coffee? We are never going to be able to grow these things at any scale in the US. It’s GOOD to import these things — it means we have them, when we otherwise wouldn’t.
Can someone help me find even a crappy rationale that someone *might* believe where this made sense?
It is a negotiation to get the other country to reduce its tariffs. If you place tariffs on things they don't export, they have no incentive to reduce tariffs.
How is it both a negotiating tactic, and also the mechanism to bring in $600 billion to offset tax breaks for millionaires? It can't be both.