Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

WTAF

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

WTAF

every woman, no matter their politics, should be offended by that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

WTAF

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sixty-six pages about a word that totally doesn’t bother people, and absolutely won’t stick.

It doesn't have to stick. It just makes people think and really look at the behavior. It's gotten so normalized to be bizarre since 2016. People just got used to it.

This isn't some slick name alone like the kind you are used to Trump making up. He can't seem to talk about his competitors without a derogatory name. :roll:

It's just people stepping back and wondering why the front people of the GOP are acting like this and how strange it is.

PP. My post was (clearly badly done) /s.

They are total weirdos.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt this whole calling your opponent "weird" strategy will be effective. Please dems come up with a different campaign attack if you want to win, this one will fall flat.

You are missing the beauty of weird. For 8 years Trump has positioned himself as a Larger than Life dominating figure. And too many non MAGA gave away their own power by talking about Trump as strong man. Calling him a wanna be dictator or authoritarian helps him. Makes him seem more powerful.

“Weird” bursts that bubble.

Yes, Trump is a psychopath. But he’s also weird.

He says weird things (Hannibal Lector), wants to pass weird policies (tariffs, building a physical wall…), he chose a very weird running mate. He surrounds himself with bottle rimmed glasses swinger Roger Stone, ostrich leather jacket wearer Paul Manafort and 3 shirts Steve Bannon.

I think it’s very healthy for Americans to realize how UN NORMAL these people are.

+1
They’re not the handsome, good looking power party they think they are. They’re just effing weird. Even their retaliatory attempts to paint Harris as weird fall flat because the party is so far gone that they don’t know what normal looks like anymore.

+1, weird gets to the heart of how much we've normalized entirely abnormal behavior in Trump for the last 9 years. It's like waking up and realizing, "WTF is this, America?" Walz is the opposite of weird and that'll be on display for the rest of the campaign.

Walz plays the dumb bumpkin act so hard that it is weird, frankly.

Not as weird as JD Mountain Dew’s act.

Walz also drinks diet Mountain Dew just like JD.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Stop calling us weird

Mar-a-lago chic, where weird meets wealth

But take these two out of Florida, change their gender, and feature then in a public library to host a Drag Queen Reading Event for children and suddenly their “normal” again….amiright, lefties?!?!

This is why the “weird” thing is laughable.

Drag is performance art. It highlights certain features and exaggerates to absurdity, with awareness and intent. These women don't have the awareness or intent that they are absurd, and they don't acknowledge that they are performing absurdity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sixty-six pages about a word that totally doesn’t bother people, and absolutely won’t stick.

It doesn't have to stick. It just makes people think and really look at the behavior. It's gotten so normalized to be bizarre since 2016. People just got used to it.

This isn't some slick name alone like the kind you are used to Trump making up. He can't seem to talk about his competitors without a derogatory name.

It's just people stepping back and wondering why the front people of the GOP are acting like this and how strange it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Stop calling us weird

Mar-a-lago chic, where weird meets wealth

But take these two out of Florida, change their gender, and feature then in a public library to host a Drag Queen Reading Event for children and suddenly their “normal” again….amiright, lefties?!?!

This is why the “weird” thing is laughable.

Anonymous wrote:Sixty-six pages about a word that totally doesn’t bother people, and absolutely won’t stick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt this whole calling your opponent "weird" strategy will be effective. Please dems come up with a different campaign attack if you want to win, this one will fall flat.

You are missing the beauty of weird. For 8 years Trump has positioned himself as a Larger than Life dominating figure. And too many non MAGA gave away their own power by talking about Trump as strong man. Calling him a wanna be dictator or authoritarian helps him. Makes him seem more powerful.

“Weird” bursts that bubble.

Yes, Trump is a psychopath. But he’s also weird.

He says weird things (Hannibal Lector), wants to pass weird policies (tariffs, building a physical wall…), he chose a very weird running mate. He surrounds himself with bottle rimmed glasses swinger Roger Stone, ostrich leather jacket wearer Paul Manafort and 3 shirts Steve Bannon.

I think it’s very healthy for Americans to realize how UN NORMAL these people are.

+1
They’re not the handsome, good looking power party they think they are. They’re just effing weird. Even their retaliatory attempts to paint Harris as weird fall flat because the party is so far gone that they don’t know what normal looks like anymore.

+1, weird gets to the heart of how much we've normalized entirely abnormal behavior in Trump for the last 9 years. It's like waking up and realizing, "WTF is this, America?" Walz is the opposite of weird and that'll be on display for the rest of the campaign.

Walz plays the dumb bumpkin act so hard that it is weird, frankly.

Not as weird as JD Mountain Dew’s act.