Anonymous wrote:CW's biomedical engineer testifying today and cooking Karen's goose well and good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've just happened upon the "MicroDots" YouTube channel which contains dissection of videos from the case. Maybe I'm falling for some turtle boy propaganda but... there are a lot of unanswered questions. The one of the Judge coaching the prosecutor to object, please tell me that's a totally random catch among hours and hours of courthouse video. It does look bad.

Can the defense call Higgins in its case?

If you fall for any turtle boy propaganda, then you are a fool. Stay far away from him and his FKR cult.

Anonymous wrote:I've just happened upon the "MicroDots" YouTube channel which contains dissection of videos from the case. Maybe I'm falling for some turtle boy propaganda but... there are a lot of unanswered questions. The one of the Judge coaching the prosecutor to object, please tell me that's a totally random catch among hours and hours of courthouse video. It does look bad.

Can the defense call Higgins in its case?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've just happened upon the "MicroDots" YouTube channel which contains dissection of videos from the case. Maybe I'm falling for some turtle boy propaganda but... there are a lot of unanswered questions. The one of the Judge coaching the prosecutor to object, please tell me that's a totally random catch among hours and hours of courthouse video. It does look bad.

Can the defense call Higgins in its case?

Okay that makes sense. It did seem like a relatively benign procedural issue they resolved at sidebar. If that’s the worst they have among hours of tape it’s probably no big deal.

I’m a prosecutor. It’s not abnormal for a judge to signal to one of the parties that the judge wants them to object. Usually it’s because the testimony is repetitive or dragging on and the judge is sick of hearing it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think John O’Keefe was contributory at fault or just as negligent - there’s no evidence at all this was intentional if it was her, come on. None. - he was a policeman encouraging wasted people including his “girlfriend” to get just incredibly drunk and drive in a blizzard. Apparently because he thought there would be no consequences even though he obviously routinely dealt with drunk driving accidents. He was a negligent POS.

I see it this way too. Absolutely terrible decisions all around. Nobody is a reliable witness. And there is just no way to prove that his drunk self didn’t accidentally stumble into the back of her car while she was backing up, unbeknownst to her drunk self and the whole thing wasn’t just some giant drunk fest disaster waiting to happen. I truly don’t believe she knew that she hit him, purposefully drove away leaving him there for dead, and then called leaving him those absurd voicemails wondering where he is.

The whole thing should just be a life lesson in not getting $hit faced and nothing good happens after midnight. She’s no more culpable than him or anyone else involved.

Anonymous wrote:I've just happened upon the "MicroDots" YouTube channel which contains dissection of videos from the case. Maybe I'm falling for some turtle boy propaganda but... there are a lot of unanswered questions. The one of the Judge coaching the prosecutor to object, please tell me that's a totally random catch among hours and hours of courthouse video. It does look bad.

Can the defense call Higgins in its case?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think John O’Keefe was contributory at fault or just as negligent - there’s no evidence at all this was intentional if it was her, come on. None. - he was a policeman encouraging wasted people including his “girlfriend” to get just incredibly drunk and drive in a blizzard. Apparently because he thought there would be no consequences even though he obviously routinely dealt with drunk driving accidents. He was a negligent POS.

Yeah, watching the doc and he doesn’t seem all that stand up. Other than him taking care of his niece and nephew. But a 40 year old cop getting wasted and driving around in a storm to go to a house party, and likely cheating on his gf? He seems lame. I love the explanation that he was ‘celebrating’ his niece getting into a good catholic school. Can you imagine celebrating your kids getting into school by leaving them at home while you drink and drive around town during a storm? He watched Karen drink. And I’ll admit karen read seems a little crazy to have stayed with him.

Anonymous wrote:I think John O’Keefe was contributory at fault or just as negligent - there’s no evidence at all this was intentional if it was her, come on. None. - he was a policeman encouraging wasted people including his “girlfriend” to get just incredibly drunk and drive in a blizzard. Apparently because he thought there would be no consequences even though he obviously routinely dealt with drunk driving accidents. He was a negligent POS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think John O’Keefe was contributory at fault or just as negligent - there’s no evidence at all this was intentional if it was her, come on. None. - he was a policeman encouraging wasted people including his “girlfriend” to get just incredibly drunk and drive in a blizzard. Apparently because he thought there would be no consequences even though he obviously routinely dealt with drunk driving accidents. He was a negligent POS.

Yeah, watching the doc and he doesn’t seem all that stand up. Other than him taking care of his niece and nephew. But a 40 year old cop getting wasted and driving around in a storm to go to a house party, and likely cheating on his gf? He seems lame. I love the explanation that he was ‘celebrating’ his niece getting into a good catholic school. Can you imagine celebrating your kids getting into school by leaving them at home while you drink and drive around town during a storm? He watched Karen drink. And I’ll admit karen read seems a little crazy to have stayed with him.