Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he answer the door or not?
The Feds said he didn’t.
So who did?
Read. The. F-n. DOJ. Docs.
They conflict with other accounts.
Why is there no coherent fact timeline? Very weird. A Canadian illegal? Lives in a hippie commune? Who was in their underwear? Is the broken window glass on the outside of the house? Where did the hammer come from? Who opened the door for police? What transpired and for how long between whoever opened the door and the attack? What is the perps story about the situation? What is his defense? Why is no footage that belongs to the public being released?
It’s nuts
Canadian illegals exist. He lives in someone’s garage, not a “hippie commune.” Pelosi was in pajamas and the attacker was wearing shorts. Glass flies everywhere when you break it. The attacker brought the hammer. Refer to the indictment for answers to your other questions and please broaden your media landscape.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he answer the door or not?
The Feds said he didn’t.
So who did?
Read. The. F-n. DOJ. Docs.
They conflict with other accounts.
Why is there no coherent fact timeline? Very weird. A Canadian illegal? Lives in a hippie commune? Who was in their underwear? Is the broken window glass on the outside of the house? Where did the hammer come from? Who opened the door for police? What transpired and for how long between whoever opened the door and the attack? What is the perps story about the situation? What is his defense? Why is no footage that belongs to the public being released?
It’s nuts
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he answer the door or not?
The Feds said he didn’t.
So who did?
Read. The. F-n. DOJ. Docs.
They conflict with other accounts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he answer the door or not?
The Feds said he didn’t.
So who did?
Read. The. F-n. DOJ. Docs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Body cam shows Paul Pelosi opened the door. Why does this matter? The fact is that he was attacked by a crazed intruder. Why is this a conspiracy?
Why would the police not disarm the man immediately? Why would they just talk to him with a hammer in his hand?
What are you suggesting happened? Are you denying a crazed intruder attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer? The hospital stay was a hoax?
No, calm down. I am neither a conspiracy theorist nor a republican. I am just honestly trying to understand what happened (i.e. where the police at fault for not disarming him), if it is correct that they all spoke for some time before the physical attack.
Haven’t you yet realized that the nutters accuse anybody that asks intelligent questions of being a MAGA fascist? They don’t want the facts, they just want to scream their opinion.
The facts are in the court documents. Twisting your face and asking questions with easily found answers is a Tucker move.
+1
This is what has been bugging me about this case. MAGAs fabricated suspicions are not intelligent questions or opinions. They are meant to stir up conspiracy theories and heartless memes about an elderly man attacked by a RWNJ intruder who has admitted he was after his wife. Paul didn’t act in a Bond movie scripted way and suddenly the RWNJ is his gay lover. Rs have responded despicably, joining in on the fabricated suspicions and jokes.
Anonymous wrote:Did he answer the door or not?
The Feds said he didn’t.
So who did?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He probably didn't feel threatened by the guy because he had calmed him down a little.
It matters what he did because the DOJ's statement in their indictment is at odds with what has been reported to be in the bodycam videos. IF the reports are true, then the DOJ lied to the court.
It’s much more likely that Almaguer’s source was questionable and lied to him, which is why he was suspended.
This has been reported by another news source, agreeing with Almaguer's report, and citing bodycam footage as the source.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Body cam shows Paul Pelosi opened the door. Why does this matter? The fact is that he was attacked by a crazed intruder. Why is this a conspiracy?
Why would the police not disarm the man immediately? Why would they just talk to him with a hammer in his hand?
What are you suggesting happened? Are you denying a crazed intruder attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer? The hospital stay was a hoax?
No, calm down. I am neither a conspiracy theorist nor a republican. I am just honestly trying to understand what happened (i.e. where the police at fault for not disarming him), if it is correct that they all spoke for some time before the physical attack.
Anonymous wrote:Lied or didn’t have the right information!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He probably didn't feel threatened by the guy because he had calmed him down a little.
It matters what he did because the DOJ's statement in their indictment is at odds with what has been reported to be in the bodycam videos. IF the reports are true, then the DOJ lied to the court.
It’s much more likely that Almaguer’s source was questionable and lied to him, which is why he was suspended.