Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?

Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.

Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.

Any evidence of these books being available to young children, or contain "porn"? Both books are written for teens and young adults that are at least high school age. If you're objecting to that, then I'm guessing you are the type that preaches for abstinence-only sex education.

You’d guess wrong. I’m all for factual sex education. These books are not that.

Wrong. For many LGBTQ+ young adults, This Book is Gay has been considered a factual guide on sex education for their community.

What’s the purpose of depicting anal sex to children? Are we afraid of the children putting the wrong thing in the wrong place after school?

By children so you mean 16, 17, 18 year olds?

Do we need to advise teens on how to have anal sex?
-NP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?

Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.

Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.

Any evidence of these books being available to young children, or contain "porn"? Both books are written for teens and young adults that are at least high school age. If you're objecting to that, then I'm guessing you are the type that preaches for abstinence-only sex education.

You’d guess wrong. I’m all for factual sex education. These books are not that.

Wrong. For many LGBTQ+ young adults, This Book is Gay has been considered a factual guide on sex education for their community.

What’s the purpose of depicting anal sex to children? Are we afraid of the children putting the wrong thing in the wrong place after school?

By children so you mean 16, 17, 18 year olds?

Anonymous wrote:It was only a few years ago, and really ongoing, that the left was seeking to 'decolonize' the curriculum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's raunchiness throughout history. Why are Americans so prudish?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?

Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.

Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.

Any evidence of these books being available to young children, or contain "porn"? Both books are written for teens and young adults that are at least high school age. If you're objecting to that, then I'm guessing you are the type that preaches for abstinence-only sex education.

You’d guess wrong. I’m all for factual sex education. These books are not that.

Wrong. For many LGBTQ+ young adults, This Book is Gay has been considered a factual guide on sex education for their community.

What’s the purpose of depicting anal sex to children? Are we afraid of the children putting the wrong thing in the wrong place after school?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?

Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.

Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.

Any evidence of these books being available to young children, or contain "porn"? Both books are written for teens and young adults that are at least high school age. If you're objecting to that, then I'm guessing you are the type that preaches for abstinence-only sex education.

You’d guess wrong. I’m all for factual sex education. These books are not that.

Wrong. For many LGBTQ+ young adults, This Book is Gay has been considered a factual guide on sex education for their community.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?

Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.

Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.

And these are at your local library?

They are in school libraries. Hence the uproar.

No, sweetcheeks, we’re talking about public libraries now.

Such a sweet rosy view based in utter ignorance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book Banning is one of a number of ways the GOP is undermining public education with a goal of making the masses dumb and the elite, with access to education on top of the pyramid. The reason the US led the world in the 20th Century was the public education system. But since the 1950's there has been a banging of the drum to dismantle public education, defunding the Dept of Education nationally, installing vouchers to use public money for religious schools, charters given to masked religious schools, the CRT bogeyman to scare suburban whites, etc.

It is ongoing and it is successful.

Dept of Education was not established until around 1980

Anonymous wrote:Book Banning is one of a number of ways the GOP is undermining public education with a goal of making the masses dumb and the elite, with access to education on top of the pyramid. The reason the US led the world in the 20th Century was the public education system. But since the 1950's there has been a banging of the drum to dismantle public education, defunding the Dept of Education nationally, installing vouchers to use public money for religious schools, charters given to masked religious schools, the CRT bogeyman to scare suburban whites, etc.

It is ongoing and it is successful.

Anonymous wrote:Book Banning is one of a number of ways the GOP is undermining public education with a goal of making the masses dumb and the elite, with access to education on top of the pyramid. The reason the US led the world in the 20th Century was the public education system. But since the 1950's there has been a banging of the drum to dismantle public education, defunding the Dept of Education nationally, installing vouchers to use public money for religious schools, charters given to masked religious schools, the CRT bogeyman to scare suburban whites, etc.

It is ongoing and it is successful.