Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, he's innocent until proven guilty, you know.

Absolutely. Can’t wait to hear his explanation of a payment to someone he doesn’t know and didn’t work for him (according to him).
This Awan family stinks to high heaven.
How much you wanna bet they have dirt on these Dems from their access to their emails/servers and that is why this is not being pursued?

Oh, come ON! A McDi's job certainly qualifies you to work for crooked Dems in Congress.

Are you kidding? For Debbie gasserman schlitz it makes you a subject matter expert. She might be the most corrupt, evil person in government, though that’s only because Hillary is vision questing in the Vermont woods—or wherever the Hell she ran off to.

A pretty laughable claim, especially in light of Trump cabinet corruption, obstruction of justice by Devin Nunes and Matt Gaetz, and Trump's own shady dealings. Why won't he release his taxes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, he's innocent until proven guilty, you know.

Absolutely. Can’t wait to hear his explanation of a payment to someone he doesn’t know and didn’t work for him (according to him).
This Awan family stinks to high heaven.
How much you wanna bet they have dirt on these Dems from their access to their emails/servers and that is why this is not being pursued?

Oh, come ON! A McDi's job certainly qualifies you to work for crooked Dems in Congress.

Are you kidding? For Debbie gasserman schlitz it makes you a subject matter expert. She might be the most corrupt, evil person in government, though that’s only because Hillary is vision questing in the Vermont woods—or wherever the Hell she ran off to.

Anonymous wrote:Wow, somebody is desperate about all these bad news from the white house. Digging out this thread to create distraction? So dumb

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, he's innocent until proven guilty, you know.

Absolutely. Can’t wait to hear his explanation of a payment to someone he doesn’t know and didn’t work for him (according to him).
This Awan family stinks to high heaven.
How much you wanna bet they have dirt on these Dems from their access to their emails/servers and that is why this is not being pursued?

Oh, come ON! A McDi's job certainly qualifies you to work for crooked Dems in Congress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, he's innocent until proven guilty, you know.

Absolutely. Can’t wait to hear his explanation of a payment to someone he doesn’t know and didn’t work for him (according to him).
This Awan family stinks to high heaven.
How much you wanna bet they have dirt on these Dems from their access to their emails/servers and that is why this is not being pursued?

Anonymous wrote:Well, he's innocent until proven guilty, you know.

A Democratic congressman is facing an ethics complaint for paying an unqualified former McDonald’s employee to manage his data for three years and allegedly admitting to handing control of his servers to now-indicted Pakistani-American Imran Awan despite Awan not being on his staff.

A complaint submitted against Rep. Emanuel Cleaver on Wednesday asks the Congressional Ethics Office to investigate Cleaver’s response to a question about his IT aide Rao Abbas whose previous job field was fast food.

“Imran is the guy who worked in our office. I don’t know this other guy,” Cleaver responded on an audio recording.

Payroll records show that Imran Awan was not on the Missouri lawmaker’s payroll, and for the last three years, the only person authorized to manage his servers was Abbas.

“There is no logical or reasonable explanation for Cleaver to affirmatively identify Awan as his employee unless Awan was the individual actually providing IT services,” the complaint from the Foundation for Accountability & Civic Trust (FACT) said. “Cleaver accepted IT services and incredibly would have given full access to his data and files to someone who was not on his staff.”

“Moreover, Cleaver used taxpayer dollars to pay over $60,000 to Abbas, who he did not know and the evidence indicates did not do work for him,” it said. “Ethics rules may have been blatantly violated.” It accuses Cleaver of paying a “ghost employee” and putting data at risk by violating House information security policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

It shocks and appalls me that individual Congress members - many of them elderly and total IT luddites - are responsible for their own IT security. How f#cking stupid can Congress be?

If that is what appalls you about this story, then you’re not really paying attention.

Given that this whole debacle is happening BECAUSE Congress has completely abdicated national security to contractors serving individual offices, I'd say that this set-up is a f#cking travesty. It's putting data security in the hands of IT amateurs (i.e., members of Congress). Do you think the NSA, DoD, or CIA runs their systems this way?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clap it out with me....

WE NEED TO TIGHTEN THIS UP.

Yeah, tighten it up indeed.

The Daily Caller article was chock full of "could be" and "might have" and "likely" but not as many definites.

Get back to us when you have something more solid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clap it out with me....

WE NEED TO TIGHTEN THIS UP.

Yeah, tighten it up indeed.

The Daily Caller article was chock full of "could be" and "might have" and "likely" but not as many definites.

Get back to us when you have something more solid.

Anonymous wrote:Clap it out with me....

WE NEED TO TIGHTEN THIS UP.