Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many 9th grade teachers were destaffed from Westfield for next year? I know two personally.
Sad. And it’s infuriating how the school board completely disregards the negative impacts of these types of boundary changes.
It’s kind of a shit-show. They can’t really claim they’d leave Westfield at 74% because it was “too big” when they are leaving Oakton so large. They just make short-term decisions based on what they think they get away with and what will placate the loudest people with the most money. Money may not exchange hands, but it’s still corrupt.
100% agree there is a LOT of corruption. When a large block of people organize, the school board members think about that large block of votes and nothing else. Disgusting.
Wait, so you want the school board to ignore the community? Talk about disgusting.
No, what's disgusting is the amount of people who are just concerned about athletics and the socioeconomic status of their children's classmates.
Anonymous wrote:Currently at McDaniel’s town hall meeting.
Skyview will get the Air Force JROTC program.
McDaniel joked that Navy Island would survive a nuclear war. He wanted to get rid of the island but it won't happen this time.
Many pro-Oakton/Crossfield parents showed uo and voiced strong support for Oakton and Scenario 2.
McDaniel doesn't have an issue not to apply freeze the walker mandate for Oak Hill kids under Scenario 1.
Marty confirmed that the final scenario will not be significantly different from the two revised scenarios.
After June 16, they will no longer accept comments from the boundary tool.
Kids in the boundary will take a bus from depot or closer bus stop if available.
Anonymous wrote:I am listening to the Kyle McDaniel call and you guys, Crossfield parents are insane. I get that you guys want to stay at Oakton, but your arguments are laughable. You need better arguments.
Anonymous wrote:I think what the RIO parents need to recognize is that just because they're loud and they show up to all the meetings doesn't mean they represent the entire community. Kyle said that he's received a lot of support for the Skyview move from Crossfield families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many 9th grade teachers were destaffed from Westfield for next year? I know two personally.
Sad. And it’s infuriating how the school board completely disregards the negative impacts of these types of boundary changes.
It’s kind of a shit-show. They can’t really claim they’d leave Westfield at 74% because it was “too big” when they are leaving Oakton so large. They just make short-term decisions based on what they think they get away with and what will placate the loudest people with the most money. Money may not exchange hands, but it’s still corrupt.
100% agree there is a LOT of corruption. When a large block of people organize, the school board members think about that large block of votes and nothing else. Disgusting.
Wait, so you want the school board to ignore the community? Talk about disgusting.
DP. Obviously some people have more time and resources to work the system to their advantage. The School Board should be serving the entire community and not just deferring to the wishes of the loudest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many 9th grade teachers were destaffed from Westfield for next year? I know two personally.
Sad. And it’s infuriating how the school board completely disregards the negative impacts of these types of boundary changes.
It’s kind of a shit-show. They can’t really claim they’d leave Westfield at 74% because it was “too big” when they are leaving Oakton so large. They just make short-term decisions based on what they think they get away with and what will placate the loudest people with the most money. Money may not exchange hands, but it’s still corrupt.
100% agree there is a LOT of corruption. When a large block of people organize, the school board members think about that large block of votes and nothing else. Disgusting.
Wait, so you want the school board to ignore the community? Talk about disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:I am wondering, after the boundary is set, will they let allow rising 9th grade kids, who did not opt in earlier, in the boundary to opt-in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am wondering, after the boundary is set, will they let allow rising 9th grade kids, who did not opt in earlier, in the boundary to opt-in.
Best question I have seen. I bet a lot of families will be wondering this.
Will they? Who knows.
Should they? Absolutely.
Anonymous wrote:I am wondering, after the boundary is set, will they let allow rising 9th grade kids, who did not opt in earlier, in the boundary to opt-in.