Anonymous wrote:What's the best way to strip out the nonsense factors and build your own ranking using US News and maybe WSJ data?
I only care about first year experience, teaching quality (teacher-student ratios should factor into this), internships and job placements, and ROI (based on full cost of attendance, not their average cost).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's wonderful that colleges are generous with money and Pell Grants for those in need of financial assistance. I don't see how that factor makes a school more academically superior to any other school.
Yes, very difficult to understand.
School A admits the top 5% of applicants but cherry picks the kids who can pay the most. Student body is very smart but mostly UMC+. No class mobility. Not a huge measurable difference in outcomes.
School B admits the top 5% of applicants and is also need aware and makes a special effort to find students across all socioeconomic categories, including the poor. Student body is not mostly UMC. Substantial class mobility, the school makes a measurable difference in outcomes.
Who can possibly solve the puzzle of “which school is better?”
School B is better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's wonderful that colleges are generous with money and Pell Grants for those in need of financial assistance. I don't see how that factor makes a school more academically superior to any other school.
Yes, very difficult to understand.
School A admits the top 5% of applicants but cherry picks the kids who can pay the most. Student body is very smart but mostly UMC+. No class mobility. Not a huge measurable difference in outcomes.
School B admits the top 5% of applicants and is also need aware and makes a special effort to find students across all socioeconomic categories, including the poor. Student body is not mostly UMC. Substantial class mobility, the school makes a measurable difference in outcomes.
Who can possibly solve the puzzle of “which school is better?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.S. News’ Rankings Not the ‘Behemoth’ Perceived
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/2023/09/13/us-news-not-behemoth-one-might-think
lol ok but everyone refers to it
Lol, don’t you mean only DCUMers refer to it?
Baloney. Schools are putting out press releases about it. That means they care. You’re delusional.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's wonderful that colleges are generous with money and Pell Grants for those in need of financial assistance. I don't see how that factor makes a school more academically superior to any other school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.S. News’ Rankings Not the ‘Behemoth’ Perceived
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/2023/09/13/us-news-not-behemoth-one-might-think
lol ok but everyone refers to it
Lol, don’t you mean only DCUMers refer to it?
Baloney. Schools are putting out press releases about it. That means they care. You’re delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.S. News’ Rankings Not the ‘Behemoth’ Perceived
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/2023/09/13/us-news-not-behemoth-one-might-think
lol ok but everyone refers to it
Lol, don’t you mean only DCUMers refer to it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.S. News’ Rankings Not the ‘Behemoth’ Perceived
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/2023/09/13/us-news-not-behemoth-one-might-think
lol ok but everyone refers to it
Anonymous wrote:I think it's wonderful that colleges are generous with money and Pell Grants for those in need of financial assistance. I don't see how that factor makes a school more academically superior to any other school.
Anonymous wrote:U.S. News’ Rankings Not the ‘Behemoth’ Perceived
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/2023/09/13/us-news-not-behemoth-one-might-think
Anonymous wrote:I think the new ranking makes sense