Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:23     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.


Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.


Isn't TN last in the country in education?


Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.


Nashville, as in the democratic bastion of TN? LOL
I love how you take credit for what the dems accomplish to pull your sh!t state up


We love TN; we are proud of our state. We will do us; and you can do you! Separate but together


You don’t speak for every woman in your state. No one forced you to have an abortion.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:22     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.


Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.


Isn't TN last in the country in education?


Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.


Not for long.

+1000 My professionally successful cousins in a group chat texted me they are moving out of TN anywhere but red state.


Bless their hearts! We wish them success and prosperity in their new homes.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:22     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.


This is actually a good idea. All restaurant owners who believe abortion rights should remain legal should refuse to serve these conservative justices in their establishments. Their private clubs should kick them out. Their employees should all quit taking care of their homes, cars, health and safety. Shame them in public, so they become prisoners in their own homes. Just don't harass them. That makes you look bad, not them.

I would take it a step further and say we start naming, labeling, and shaming forced-birthers and those who belong to groups that espouse any hint of anti-choice beliefs, whether they be colleagues, acquaintances, and yes sadly family members. Get them on record, make them choose sides. Name and shame. Name and shame.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:21     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.


Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.


Isn't TN last in the country in education?


Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.


Nashville, as in the democratic bastion of TN? LOL
I love how you take credit for what the dems accomplish to pull your sh!t state up


We love TN; we are proud of our state. We will do us; and you can do you! Separate but together
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:20     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?


Whoa whoa whoa—state decisis anyone?


The problem is that the reasoning behind Roe is fairly shaky.

The men who decided it chose the shakiest reason.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:20     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.



Did you know that Ginnie Thomas is childless. She and Clarence Thomas have no kids together. Thomas’s son from a previous marriage to a black woman bo longer has a relationship with him.

Mitch McConnell is no longer on speaking terms with his daughters from his first marriage. He has no children with Elaine Chao.

Kinda weird that we have so many childless rightwing elites or those estranged from their own families making policies on this stuff.


Thomas is a father and McConnell is a father. Got it.


Why are their wives childless? Why do they not have healthy relationships with their own offspring?

So weird.


Why is that your business? Do you ask everyone who is childless why they are childless?


They will have privacy when we have ours back. Until then enjoy the scrutiny.


No. Don't be a hypocrite. Unless you are willing to berate ALL women for being childless, you need to shut up.


All women are not going after the rights of others. I respect their choice until they take mine away.


These women did not take your choice away either.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:20     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.



Why is this an issue. Is this a another “motherhood is magical” thing? Because she can certainly comprehend that she wants to make her own choices for her life without being married with a child.

What a stupid post.



The fact that 59% of abortion patients already have at least one child means there are plenty of pro-choice mothers to pick from.

And that’s not including the mothers like me who haven’t had abortions but became even more pro-choice once we experienced the full difficulties of pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting. My (unplanned) child is the light of my life, but I wouldn’t wish this on anyone who wasn’t willing going in.


I was always pro-choice but became staunchly so when pregnant with my first. It was hard AF. And by the time I got accidentally pregnant with a third that was most definitely not wanted, I was busy researching my abortion options. Fortunately for me, nature intervened and I miscarried. I had to have a D&C to make sure everything was gone. But some of these sickos believe even that is a crime. Its my most fervent wish that all of these people rot in hell.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:19     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

This decision will have repercussions across the world, influencing public opinion and politics in poor countries. We already have a world population and migrant crisis.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:16     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At least the Onion has some honesty behind the opinion

https://www.theonion.com/kavanaugh-thomas-champion-creating-better-future-for-n-1849106105?utm_campaign=later-linkinbio-theonion&utm_content=later-27813860&utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkin.bio


it's not funny


I never said it was. It’s disgusting, but that is who is sitting in the highest court of the land.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:15     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


This is a fascinating idea.


Great idea. Do it now!!!
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:11     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:One option might be to boycott colleges and universities in red states, since female students lives are at risk by attending the Vanderbilts and Emorys, etc. Moreover, call for conferences, sports leagues, etc. to be defunded in these states. Make it easier for women to gain in-state residency kind of like asylum when they flee these states. Academic boycotts of red state politician, etc.


Another good idea. I wouldn't send my DD to college in a state that's banned abortion.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:10     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.



Did you know that Ginnie Thomas is childless. She and Clarence Thomas have no kids together. Thomas’s son from a previous marriage to a black woman bo longer has a relationship with him.

Mitch McConnell is no longer on speaking terms with his daughters from his first marriage. He has no children with Elaine Chao.

Kinda weird that we have so many childless rightwing elites or those estranged from their own families making policies on this stuff.


Thomas is a father and McConnell is a father. Got it.


Why are their wives childless? Why do they not have healthy relationships with their own offspring?

So weird.


Why is that your business? Do you ask everyone who is childless why they are childless?


They will have privacy when we have ours back. Until then enjoy the scrutiny.


No. Don't be a hypocrite. Unless you are willing to berate ALL women for being childless, you need to shut up.


All women are not going after the rights of others. I respect their choice until they take mine away.
Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:10     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 06/24/2022 19:06     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.


63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.


But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.


What gets me was learning how many abortion patients say the major reason they need an abortion is because they can’t afford to raise a child. (75% of abortion patients are low-income, the majority already have at least one child.) Supporting those mothers so they can have the baby should be a no-brainer for people who hate abortion. Real protections against pregnancy discrimination, access to affordable childcare, family leave and sick leave would help these women keep and raise their babies. And legal changes in that direction would be SO EASY because liberals would also be on board with making women’s lives better. AND most (all?) of those policies are viewed favorably by a majority of Americans.

No interest.

See also: anything that increases access to affordable contraception; anything that offers better protections against rape, stealthing (nonconsensual condom removal), or domestic abuse.