Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 12:17     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 12:05     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these posts about billionaires are the problem and we shouldn't have these....what is your plan exactly? In an individualistic, capitalistic society that worships money, a few will end up ultra rich.

The ultra rich pay off the governent so taxing them more will never happen.

Even if they are the problem, we can't eliminate this problem, so more useful to figure out how to live with them.

(I'm not a billionaire, and I wish life were more fair and all people had compassion and worked toward the good for all.)


“Billionaires are above the law, can’t do anything about it, so I guess we just learn to accept that they get to do whatever they want without consequence while the rest of us passively accept whatever they impose on us, amirite?”


Sounds just like defeatist liberalism that has to cover up for the fact that their party politicians are exclusively lip-syncing puppets that only ever do what the elites want them to do.



Well, if Trump and co just released the files, and actually prosecuted people, FOR SOMETHING THAT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE, we wouldn't be here. But, then the entire administration would crash out and take Bill Clinton with them.


You see there it is. You seem to think the fact that Biden and Obama were puppets who conveniently did nothing and Trump was a billionaire, even though he did more than those two that his DOJ is at fault.

I mean I get it the DOJ has its own agenda either way and is mostly infested with planted moles and other spineless boobs trying to protect their tales and was primarily designed to protect the billionaires, not prosecute them, but Trump the billionaire is doing more than puppet O or puppet B.


Biden and Obama weren't in there. They clearly are not part of this cabal. It is at the heart of Trump world.


Serious question: WHO CARES what the political affiliation is of anyone who participated in this gruesome crime ring? These are crimes against humanity, I really DGAF their policy opinions.
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 09:54     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these posts about billionaires are the problem and we shouldn't have these....what is your plan exactly? In an individualistic, capitalistic society that worships money, a few will end up ultra rich.

The ultra rich pay off the governent so taxing them more will never happen.

Even if they are the problem, we can't eliminate this problem, so more useful to figure out how to live with them.

(I'm not a billionaire, and I wish life were more fair and all people had compassion and worked toward the good for all.)


“Billionaires are above the law, can’t do anything about it, so I guess we just learn to accept that they get to do whatever they want without consequence while the rest of us passively accept whatever they impose on us, amirite?”


Sounds just like defeatist liberalism that has to cover up for the fact that their party politicians are exclusively lip-syncing puppets that only ever do what the elites want them to do.



Well, if Trump and co just released the files, and actually prosecuted people, FOR SOMETHING THAT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE, we wouldn't be here. But, then the entire administration would crash out and take Bill Clinton with them.


You see there it is. You seem to think the fact that Biden and Obama were puppets who conveniently did nothing and Trump was a billionaire, even though he did more than those two that his DOJ is at fault.

I mean I get it the DOJ has its own agenda either way and is mostly infested with planted moles and other spineless boobs trying to protect their tales and was primarily designed to protect the billionaires, not prosecute them, but Trump the billionaire is doing more than puppet O or puppet B.


Biden and Obama weren't in there. They clearly are not part of this cabal. It is at the heart of Trump world.
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 09:51     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:Pam Blondi with Keith Frankel (white shirt)

Keith Frankel is in the Files 500 times. He and his family run an orphanage in Ukraine. Hmm anther orphanage, nothing to see here.

Apparently he lived in Palm Beach, where coincidentally Epstein had a home and also where Mar-a-lago is also located. In the Florida where Blondi was AG.

I think it's safe to say that Florida was the original sanctuary state.

The email below is Frankel forwarding an email to Epstein about a "Body Box".






Yikes!
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 08:25     Subject: Epstein Files

Stephen Fowler tells Up First that a review of the files found an FBI email from last July listing various claims and tips it received about Trump. One report accused Trump of sexually abusing a minor around 1983, when Jeffrey Epstein also allegedly abused her. A field office investigated the report, and the records show the FBI interviewed the accuser four times. Only one of the accuser’s interviews was made public, but it doesn’t mention Trump. According to the DOJ’s tracking system, the Justice Department did not make at least 50 pages of the files public. The White House and the Trump administration have consistently stated that nothing in the documents incriminates the president.
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 06:37     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whoopi and Joy are in the files, they are back pedaling hard.


So are Marilyn Monroe and Janis Joplin. If someone was mentioned in an email, Pam Bondi put them on her list that she once said didn’t exist.


Monroe died in 1962 and Joplin in 1970 it must have been their ghosts!


Great, so we’ve investigated two people. On to the million mentions of Trump, so far.
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 06:28     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump raped children. We just need to keep repeating this. Pizzagate was real, but it was all on the right! The right-wing nutters were crazy about Pizzagate, and the sooner the fact that they were misled by the leaders in *their own party*, the sooner the hard-right will start to eat their own.


The thing is, you need PROOF of this. He said, she said, is not good enough. There must be PROOF.

Is there proof in the Epstein files? Are there photos, videos, written testimony, admissions from Trump, from others that he actually had sex with underage girls? Or boys?

Without proof, there's no case. And Trump can deny it all he wants. Anyone can accuse a public figure of wrongdoing, but without proof, the accusation means very little.


Yes to all of this! It is all there. And we have only seen a fraction of it. I can’t even imagine what is in the parts they REALLY didn’t want us to see.


What atrocities could there be in the remaining files that are worse than what's already released? They must be so, so bad. So far the files include a sheik thanking Epstein for a torture video. Ghislaine brags about hunting humans in Columbia. Epstein goes hunting humans with the Rothschilds. There are suggestions some of their victims were impregnated and gave birth. The resulting babies were killed. Epstein states he ate the flesh of these babies, and it tastes like cream cheese.

A depository of horrors.

Release the files.
Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 05:37     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Pam Blondi with Keith Frankel (white shirt)

Keith Frankel is in the Files 500 times. He and his family run an orphanage in Ukraine. Hmm anther orphanage, nothing to see here.

Apparently he lived in Palm Beach, where coincidentally Epstein had a home and also where Mar-a-lago is also located. In the Florida where Blondi was AG.

I think it's safe to say that Florida was the original sanctuary state.

The email below is Frankel forwarding an email to Epstein about a "Body Box".



Anonymous
Post 02/24/2026 02:43     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:What a good detailed source about what is in the Epstein files?


https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/2/10/struggling-to-navigate-the-epstein-files-here-is-a-visual-guide

Honestly Al Jazeera provided the best breakdown I’ve seen. Objective and provided good background as to who Epstein is and what the files are and entail
Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 23:01     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2020 email from "redacted" claiming to be from the AUSA from the EDNY. He says that he is investigating the murder of Epstein.

Unearthed email apparently from Trump's DOJ sparks frenzy: 'Murder of Jeffrey Epstein'
https://www.rawstory.com/epstein-2675293507/

A 2020 email recently unearthed from the Justice Department’s release of 3.5 million files on Jeffrey Epstein appears to show a DOJ attorney referring to Epstein’s death – officially ruled a suicide – as a “murder,” a revelation that sparked a frenzy among journalists.

Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City, New York on Aug. 10, 2019, and six days later, his death was ruled a suicide by Chief Medical Examiner Barbara Sampson, despite several oddities surrounding the circumstances of his death.

In the newly unearthed email, however, an individual who identified themselves as an “AUSA in EDNY” – acronyms for an assistant U.S. attorney working in the Eastern District of New York – made a startling reference to a supposed “investigation” into the “murder” of Epstein, and close to a year after it had already been ruled a suicide.

“I'm an AUSA in EDNY and am working on an investigation into the death of an inmate at the Brooklyn MDC,” the email reads, written by the individual – whose name was redacted – identifying themselves as a DOJ attorney, and to a recipient whose name was also redacted.

“The [Office of the Chief Medical Examiner] told me that it signed a confidentiality agreement in connection with the investigation into the murder of Jeffrey Epstein. We were hoping to extend a similar agreement and I wanted to see if you could share the agreement (or a boilerplate version of it). I'm happy to speak over the phone if that's easier.”

email


If acting as an AUSA, he would have used his official email. This does not ring true.


How do you know that's not his official email? It's redacted.
Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 22:40     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2020 email from "redacted" claiming to be from the AUSA from the EDNY. He says that he is investigating the murder of Epstein.

Unearthed email apparently from Trump's DOJ sparks frenzy: 'Murder of Jeffrey Epstein'
https://www.rawstory.com/epstein-2675293507/

A 2020 email recently unearthed from the Justice Department’s release of 3.5 million files on Jeffrey Epstein appears to show a DOJ attorney referring to Epstein’s death – officially ruled a suicide – as a “murder,” a revelation that sparked a frenzy among journalists.

Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City, New York on Aug. 10, 2019, and six days later, his death was ruled a suicide by Chief Medical Examiner Barbara Sampson, despite several oddities surrounding the circumstances of his death.

In the newly unearthed email, however, an individual who identified themselves as an “AUSA in EDNY” – acronyms for an assistant U.S. attorney working in the Eastern District of New York – made a startling reference to a supposed “investigation” into the “murder” of Epstein, and close to a year after it had already been ruled a suicide.

“I'm an AUSA in EDNY and am working on an investigation into the death of an inmate at the Brooklyn MDC,” the email reads, written by the individual – whose name was redacted – identifying themselves as a DOJ attorney, and to a recipient whose name was also redacted.

“The [Office of the Chief Medical Examiner] told me that it signed a confidentiality agreement in connection with the investigation into the murder of Jeffrey Epstein. We were hoping to extend a similar agreement and I wanted to see if you could share the agreement (or a boilerplate version of it). I'm happy to speak over the phone if that's easier.”

email


If acting as an AUSA, he would have used his official email. This does not ring true.


What indicated that he did use his official email account? Do AUSA's not use iphones?
Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 22:18     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:What a good detailed source about what is in the Epstein files?


https://www.winterwatch.net/2026/02/epstein-files-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving-part-i/

Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 21:43     Subject: Re:Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:2020 email from "redacted" claiming to be from the AUSA from the EDNY. He says that he is investigating the murder of Epstein.

Unearthed email apparently from Trump's DOJ sparks frenzy: 'Murder of Jeffrey Epstein'
https://www.rawstory.com/epstein-2675293507/

A 2020 email recently unearthed from the Justice Department’s release of 3.5 million files on Jeffrey Epstein appears to show a DOJ attorney referring to Epstein’s death – officially ruled a suicide – as a “murder,” a revelation that sparked a frenzy among journalists.

Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City, New York on Aug. 10, 2019, and six days later, his death was ruled a suicide by Chief Medical Examiner Barbara Sampson, despite several oddities surrounding the circumstances of his death.

In the newly unearthed email, however, an individual who identified themselves as an “AUSA in EDNY” – acronyms for an assistant U.S. attorney working in the Eastern District of New York – made a startling reference to a supposed “investigation” into the “murder” of Epstein, and close to a year after it had already been ruled a suicide.

“I'm an AUSA in EDNY and am working on an investigation into the death of an inmate at the Brooklyn MDC,” the email reads, written by the individual – whose name was redacted – identifying themselves as a DOJ attorney, and to a recipient whose name was also redacted.

“The [Office of the Chief Medical Examiner] told me that it signed a confidentiality agreement in connection with the investigation into the murder of Jeffrey Epstein. We were hoping to extend a similar agreement and I wanted to see if you could share the agreement (or a boilerplate version of it). I'm happy to speak over the phone if that's easier.”

email


If acting as an AUSA, he would have used his official email. This does not ring true.
Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 21:23     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whoopi and Joy are in the files, they are back pedaling hard.


So are Marilyn Monroe and Janis Joplin. If someone was mentioned in an email, Pam Bondi put them on her list that she once said didn’t exist.


Monroe died in 1962 and Joplin in 1970 it must have been their ghosts!
Anonymous
Post 02/23/2026 18:01     Subject: Epstein Files

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these posts about billionaires are the problem and we shouldn't have these....what is your plan exactly? In an individualistic, capitalistic society that worships money, a few will end up ultra rich.

The ultra rich pay off the governent so taxing them more will never happen.

Even if they are the problem, we can't eliminate this problem, so more useful to figure out how to live with them.

(I'm not a billionaire, and I wish life were more fair and all people had compassion and worked toward the good for all.)


“Billionaires are above the law, can’t do anything about it, so I guess we just learn to accept that they get to do whatever they want without consequence while the rest of us passively accept whatever they impose on us, amirite?”


You must have forgotten to type out your suggestion for improvement…


Step 1. Arrest them when they break the law.