52,000 new cases today.

more cases today in Arizona than all of the EU


such a tragic failure on all levels, starting with Trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases

That is so funny! You think The Economist is left-wing and socialist! You are confusing the European interpretation of “liberal” with how “liberal”
is perceived in the US. The Economist (if you ever attempted to read it) is pro free trade, pro privatisation and free markets - not really socialist ideals, my dear.

Just because it has criticised Trump for being an idiot (which, let’s face it, he is) you dismiss it as left wing. I suggest you read it. It will make you MUCH better informed.

I am the PP you are quoting. All I can say is Whooooooosh. Right over your head.

Well, the Administration is spending more effort pushing COVID across the country unfettered than they are trying to actually try to diminish it.

It seems only logical this is helping to destroy the economy and serve Putin's interests. There is really no other logical explanation for such a failure.

At this point, I can only assume trump is intentionally sacrificing America so he can leave Joe Biden with a disaster.

Traitor.

Perfect summary of how trump screwed us all ...

https://www.statista.com/chart/22102/daily-covid-19-cases-in-the-us-and-the-eu/

If we had a real president, we’d be on the downside of the thing, and our economy would be starting to open back up. Instead, because trump is a dipshit, we are dying in record numbers and falling behind. He is destroying America. I guess Putin got what he paid for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases

That is so funny! You think The Economist is left-wing and socialist! You are confusing the European interpretation of “liberal” with how “liberal”
is perceived in the US. The Economist (if you ever attempted to read it) is pro free trade, pro privatisation and free markets - not really socialist ideals, my dear.

Just because it has criticised Trump for being an idiot (which, let’s face it, he is) you dismiss it as left wing. I suggest you read it. It will make you MUCH better informed.

Wow. The sarcasm went right over your head. -PP

Oops. I mean NP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases

That is so funny! You think The Economist is left-wing and socialist! You are confusing the European interpretation of “liberal” with how “liberal”
is perceived in the US. The Economist (if you ever attempted to read it) is pro free trade, pro privatisation and free markets - not really socialist ideals, my dear.

Just because it has criticised Trump for being an idiot (which, let’s face it, he is) you dismiss it as left wing. I suggest you read it. It will make you MUCH better informed.

Wow. The sarcasm went right over your head. -PP

Anonymous wrote:According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases

That is so funny! You think The Economist is left-wing and socialist! You are confusing the European interpretation of “liberal” with how “liberal”
is perceived in the US. The Economist (if you ever attempted to read it) is pro free trade, pro privatisation and free markets - not really socialist ideals, my dear.

Just because it has criticised Trump for being an idiot (which, let’s face it, he is) you dismiss it as left wing. I suggest you read it. It will make you MUCH better informed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are now up to 2.6 million illnesses and 127,000 deaths. Trump is responsible. How many of those could have been saved if he hadn’t lied to us?

Traitorous pig.

How much of the population has died of Covid as a percentage?

127,000 deaths in just 3 months. On an annualized basis, that will make trump’s COVID epidemic the third highest cause of death in the US, just barely behind only heart disease and cancer. And maybe, because trump’s COVID epidemic is killing lots of those same people prematurely, it might even be the highest cause of death.

2.6 million cases with 127k deaths, is a 5% death rate so far. About 1-in-20 people who get it have died. If you apply those same numbers to the whole US population, then “herd immunity” of 70% infection means over 10 million dead in the US. Are you ready for that?

In just 3 months, trump’s COVID epidemic has killed more Americans than all of WWI. It’s 18x higher than the number we have lost over nearly 20 years in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars *combined*.

Except the media was pronouncing the true infection rate was likely 10x higher than 2.6 million. This means the death rate is not 5% but it is really .05% or 1/2 of 1 percent and getting smaller every day as total cases increase and fatalities decrease.

The media is now also reporting herd immunity is much lower than the popular 70% and is much more likely to be 15-20%. Given the current accepted infection % as reported by the media and backed by accepted studies and putting that on a timeline, the US will reach herd immunity in less than 2 months.

Lastly, the CDC is now reporting the weekly all fatality curve is now less than what it would be in an average year. This means fewer people are dying on a weekly basis than the historical average. What was once a very severe pandemic is no longer a pandemic.

Sigh, you messed up your percentage conversion. Lets blame the media.

It was one thing when there were 15 cases and it would go down to zero. But at this juncture, really?

Anonymous wrote:Ok, let me make sure I understand you....

1. You claim the true infection rate is not 2.6 million, but really 26 million. (Not really what that CDC guy in the WaPo article said, but let’s go with it.)

2. Therefore, based on current reported deaths (127k) and your inflated infection rate (26m), you say it’s a 0.5% mortality rate. (This ignores the excess deaths data which suggests the real number of deaths is higher, but again, let’s go with your assumptions.)

3. A little math suggests that to achieve “herd immunity” of 70% infection, we will have over 800,000 US deaths.

4. And as I understand herd immunity, it doesn’t mean the illness or death stops at 70%, but rather that enough people have had it so that it’s continuing on a downward trend and will eventually die out after killing some more people. So the real death number would continue to increase.

So are we all really ready for 1 milllion deaths?

Apparently the "pro-life" party is.

Ok, let me make sure I understand you....

1. You claim the true infection rate is not 2.6 million, but really 26 million. (Not really what that CDC guy in the WaPo article said, but let’s go with it.)

2. Therefore, based on current reported deaths (127k) and your inflated infection rate (26m), you say it’s a 0.5% mortality rate. (This ignores the excess deaths data which suggests the real number of deaths is higher, but again, let’s go with your assumptions.)

3. A little math suggests that to achieve “herd immunity” of 70% infection, we will have over 800,000 US deaths.

4. And as I understand herd immunity, it doesn’t mean the illness or death stops at 70%, but rather that enough people have had it so that it’s continuing on a downward trend and will eventually die out after killing some more people. So the real death number would continue to increase.

So are we all really ready for 1 milllion deaths?

Anonymous wrote:According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases

We would have seen a spike in NYC by now if the protests were causing spikes. We have not.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/01/nyregion/nyc-coronavirus-protests.html?smid=fb-share

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are now up to 2.6 million illnesses and 127,000 deaths. Trump is responsible. How many of those could have been saved if he hadn’t lied to us?

Traitorous pig.

How much of the population has died of Covid as a percentage?

127,000 deaths in just 3 months. On an annualized basis, that will make trump’s COVID epidemic the third highest cause of death in the US, just barely behind only heart disease and cancer. And maybe, because trump’s COVID epidemic is killing lots of those same people prematurely, it might even be the highest cause of death.

2.6 million cases with 127k deaths, is a 5% death rate so far. About 1-in-20 people who get it have died. If you apply those same numbers to the whole US population, then “herd immunity” of 70% infection means over 10 million dead in the US. Are you ready for that?

In just 3 months, trump’s COVID epidemic has killed more Americans than all of WWI. It’s 18x higher than the number we have lost over nearly 20 years in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars *combined*.

Except the media was pronouncing the true infection rate was likely 10x higher than 2.6 million. This means the death rate is not 5% but it is really .05% or 1/2 of 1 percent and getting smaller every day as total cases increase and fatalities decrease.

The media is now also reporting herd immunity is much lower than the popular 70% and is much more likely to be 15-20%. Given the current accepted infection % as reported by the media and backed by accepted studies and putting that on a timeline, the US will reach herd immunity in less than 2 months.

Lastly, the CDC is now reporting the weekly all fatality curve is now less than what it would be in an average year. This means fewer people are dying on a weekly basis than the historical average. What was once a very severe pandemic is no longer a pandemic.

What? Post a link for any of that.

There is no link that says the pamdemic is over, so PP won't post one. PP is another RWNJ that wants to make everyone sick and has destroyed the country.

Here's a WaPo link for the 10x infection rate higher than those actually tested.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/06/25/coronavirus-cases-10-times-larger/

CDC link showing fatalities are now below average
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

According to the left-wing socialist "The Economist" rag, the protests were not the cause of any spikes

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/06/30/black-lives-matter-protests-did-not-cause-an-uptick-in-covid-19-cases