Anonymous wrote:Evan McMullin is my new crush. He is fearless and honest.
I am glad he is in Congress at this time. I wish he were President.

I wouldn't go that far, but in a world where it"s Donald vs. McMullin, I'll take McMullin.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-russia-dossier-file-investigation-hacking-christopher-steele-mi6-a7526901.html

Sorry if this has already been posted, but this is a fantastic article in the Independent:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The buck stops with Obama. He's still the President. EVERYTHING the left is complaining about happened, and is continuing to happen, on Obama's watch.

So your position is if Trump and his team and possibly even members of IC colluded in treason with Russia its Obamas fault because it happened during his tenure. Got it!!!

That you even believe that there was a big conspiracy in the Trump campaign and the IC to collide with Russia to win the election is laughable. You guys are the new Truthers

If you read something other than Pravda, Breitbart and OANN, you might have a broader base of information from which to draw your world view.

Smart folks get that all struggle with getting too narrow a view. Lots of smart lefties see this as hype, too, so don't assume you aren't the 'low information' peep.

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Other shoe drops

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wsj-idUSKBN14Y02I?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

Trump suggests he may do away with Russia sanctions if Moscow helpful[/quote]
No spin, Trumpsters? Why so quiet?[/quote]

It could come out that Trump signed a blood oath to Beelzebub himself in exchange for winning the election and Trumpers wouldn't care. [/quote]
They do care, on some level, hence the coming here once they get their talking points.[/quote]

They just hate Democrats more than they love their country. Very sad. [/quote]

Why do you all flip out when Russia is mentioned? You should note the use of "may" and "if". Bad policy, perhaps, but no obvious reason for a conniption.[/quote]

You're right. Nothing to see here! No reason to think Trump is cozy with a violent dictator who wishes us ill. No siree. Just going to keep that head in the sand. He's just being friendly, right?[/quote]

Let's assume everything you say is true about Trump cozying with a violent dictator (er, elected President) who wish us ill. I'd love to know where all your kind of clowns were in the past when our elements of our government was cozying such types? If you think people in power in this country have never gotten friendly with nasty shitheads who wish us ill, you're too ignorant for me to take seroiusly.[/quote]

Are you from around here? Doesn't sound as though you are, based on the way you write.

Evan McMullin is my new crush. He is fearless and honest.
I am glad he is in Congress at this time. I wish he were President.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The buck stops with Obama. He's still the President. EVERYTHING the left is complaining about happened, and is continuing to happen, on Obama's watch.

So your position is if Trump and his team and possibly even members of IC colluded in treason with Russia its Obamas fault because it happened during his tenure. Got it!!!

That you even believe that there was a big conspiracy in the Trump campaign and the IC to collide with Russia to win the election is laughable. You guys are the new Truthers

If you read something other than Pravda, Breitbart and OANN, you might have a broader base of information from which to draw your world view.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The buck stops with Obama. He's still the President. EVERYTHING the left is complaining about happened, and is continuing to happen, on Obama's watch.

So your position is if Trump and his team and possibly even members of IC colluded in treason with Russia its Obamas fault because it happened during his tenure. Got it!!!

That you even believe that there was a big conspiracy in the Trump campaign and the IC to collide with Russia to win the election is laughable. You guys are the new Truthers

Not really. Try some different media sources for a few days.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The buck stops with Obama. He's still the President. EVERYTHING the left is complaining about happened, and is continuing to happen, on Obama's watch.

So your position is if Trump and his team and possibly even members of IC colluded in treason with Russia its Obamas fault because it happened during his tenure. Got it!!!

That you even believe that there was a big conspiracy in the Trump campaign and the IC to collide with Russia to win the election is laughable. You guys are the new Truthers

Anonymous wrote:In his tweet this morning claiming that the dossier was proven to be false, Trump referenced the One American News Network, http://www.oann.com/

OANN was a partnership of Herring Networks and The Washington Times but is now a stand-alone entity in about 15 million homes.

I guess this is the type of news organization we will have to come to be familiar with for our future truth panels.

Oh and of course, Corey Lewandowski just signed a contract with this platform.

In his tweet this morning claiming that the dossier was proven to be false, Trump referenced the One American News Network, http://www.oann.com/

OANN was a partnership of Herring Networks and The Washington Times but is now a stand-alone entity in about 15 million homes.

I guess this is the type of news organization we will have to come to be familiar with for our future truth panels.

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Other shoe drops

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wsj-idUSKBN14Y02I?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

Trump suggests he may do away with Russia sanctions if Moscow helpful[/quote]
No spin, Trumpsters? Why so quiet?[/quote]

It could come out that Trump signed a blood oath to Beelzebub himself in exchange for winning the election and Trumpers wouldn't care. [/quote]
They do care, on some level, hence the coming here once they get their talking points.[/quote]

They just hate Democrats more than they love their country. Very sad. [/quote]

Why do you all flip out when Russia is mentioned? You should note the use of "may" and "if". Bad policy, perhaps, but no obvious reason for a conniption.[/quote]

You're right. Nothing to see here! No reason to think Trump is cozy with a violent dictator who wishes us ill. No siree. Just going to keep that head in the sand. He's just being friendly, right?[/quote]

Let's assume everything you say is true about Trump cozying with a violent dictator (er, elected President) who wish us ill. I'd love to know where all your kind of clowns were in the past when our elements of our government was cozying such types? If you think people in power in this country have never gotten friendly with nasty shitheads who wish us ill, you're too ignorant for me to take seroiusly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other shoe drops

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wsj-idUSKBN14Y02I?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

Trump suggests he may do away with Russia sanctions if Moscow helpful

No spin, Trumpsters? Why so quiet?

It could come out that Trump signed a blood oath to Beelzebub himself in exchange for winning the election and Trumpers wouldn't care.

They do care, on some level, hence the coming here once they get their talking points.

They just hate Democrats more than they love their country. Very sad.

Why do you all flip out when Russia is mentioned? You should note the use of "may" and "if". Bad policy, perhaps, but no obvious reason for a conniption.

Where do you see a "conniption"? I see people pointing it out and its possible implications. Why do you mischaracterize that? Perhaps to defend your ignoring the issue?

This whole thing is a conniption. You're imaging the bogeyman in everything and totally missing that every shred of evidence presented so far is a tempest in a tea pot. That stupid DNI report had 7 pages on RT, including its reporting on the dangers of fracking, as a serious threat to our democracy. When you find evidence that there is a elaborate plan to ruin the U.S. and by the same mechanisms glorify/support Russia, I'll listen. Until then take a valium, or maybe a bottle of valium, and stop reading the news, you clearly have serious trouble seeing what is actually before your eyes.

Anonymous wrote:The buck stops with Obama. He's still the President. EVERYTHING the left is complaining about happened, and is continuing to happen, on Obama's watch.

So your position is if Trump and his team and possibly even members of IC colluded in treason with Russia its Obamas fault because it happened during his tenure. Got it!!!

Anonymous wrote:Other shoe drops

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wsj-idUSKBN14Y02I?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

Trump suggests he may do away with Russia sanctions if Moscow helpful

And *continues* to openly insult and bait China at the same time

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other shoe drops

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wsj-idUSKBN14Y02I?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

Trump suggests he may do away with Russia sanctions if Moscow helpful

No spin, Trumpsters? Why so quiet?

It could come out that Trump signed a blood oath to Beelzebub himself in exchange for winning the election and Trumpers wouldn't care.

They do care, on some level, hence the coming here once they get their talking points.

They just hate Democrats more than they love their country. Very sad.

Why do you all flip out when Russia is mentioned? You should note the use of "may" and "if". Bad policy, perhaps, but no obvious reason for a conniption.

Where do you see a "conniption"? I see people pointing it out and its possible implications. Why do you mischaracterize that? Perhaps to defend your ignoring the issue?