Anonymous wrote:Is the MCE 2030 team still together? They had it tough last season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
And that’s the point. They jumped clubs for a better product. Can’t imagine some of them wouldn’t think the same thing for HS.
MCE was imploding and they jumped together, splitting up the team who came together seems very different
I think you missed PPs point. MCE has not imploded. It still exists and probably will continue to exist for several years. Parents saw an opportunity to get better coaching and support, then jumped clubs. At least that’s the story on these boards. If there is an opportunity that provides a better relative experience, why wouldn’t they move over?
Anonymous wrote:That's great except the OP just made that up. No one said YJ parents would stay based on loyalty. Or even infer it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
This is where people get blinded. It’s not about loyalty, it’s about finding the best fit for your daughter to grow and develop. It’s ok for that answer to be different for different people.
100%. Not sure why parents get this sense of blind loyalty to a club.
Do you accept a better job offer if you think it’s a better fit and pays more? Not sure how many adults would turn that down. Some might out of a sense of loyalty.
The loyalty to the club is weird. The club directors aren’t losing sleep. Parents are too emotionally attached.
That's great except the OP just made that up. No one said YJ parents would stay based on loyalty. Or even infer it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
This is where people get blinded. It’s not about loyalty, it’s about finding the best fit for your daughter to grow and develop. It’s ok for that answer to be different for different people.
100%. Not sure why parents get this sense of blind loyalty to a club.
Do you accept a better job offer if you think it’s a better fit and pays more? Not sure how many adults would turn that down. Some might out of a sense of loyalty.
The loyalty to the club is weird. The club directors aren’t losing sleep. Parents are too emotionally attached.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
This is where people get blinded. It’s not about loyalty, it’s about finding the best fit for your daughter to grow and develop. It’s ok for that answer to be different for different people.
Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
And that’s the point. They jumped clubs for a better product. Can’t imagine some of them wouldn’t think the same thing for HS.
MCE was imploding and they jumped together, splitting up the team who came together seems very different
I think you missed PPs point. MCE has not imploded. It still exists and probably will continue to exist for several years. Parents saw an opportunity to get better coaching and support, then jumped clubs. At least that’s the story on these boards. If there is an opportunity that provides a better relative experience, why wouldn’t they move over?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
And that’s the point. They jumped clubs for a better product. Can’t imagine some of them wouldn’t think the same thing for HS.
MCE was imploding and they jumped together, splitting up the team who came together seems very different
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
And that’s the point. They jumped clubs for a better product. Can’t imagine some of them wouldn’t think the same thing for HS.
Anonymous wrote:Assuming that YJMA 2030 parents have any kind of club loyalty is first mistake in this reasoning. They have proved they don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not? They already lost one to Hero’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[i]Anonymous wrote:We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?
In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.
FACTS!
In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.
FACTS!
Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.
Sure, but I’m guessing the top YJMA girls won’t go to CLC.
Exactly. YJMA already lost a top player. This year was just the beginning.
YJMA lost one player and gained three others, probably a net positive and it sounds like typical movement between clubs between seasons. No sign that all of their top talent will flee to CLC in two years.