Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?
Dp- they are also going after the hospital. Forced birthers are such garbage. This is what you voted for. This is what you wanted. Own it. The doctors and hospitals are following the laws you fought for. Don’t try and slink away now. Aren’t you proud of yourselves.
Did the hospital challenge the law for the child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?
Dp- they are also going after the hospital. Forced birthers are such garbage. This is what you voted for. This is what you wanted. Own it. The doctors and hospitals are following the laws you fought for. Don’t try and slink away now. Aren’t you proud of yourselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?
I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.
They are going after her because of her own statements. She engaged first.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the girl’s rapist in prison?
Did anyone care about putting the rapist where he belongs? I remember he was live-in boyfriend of the girl’s mother. Did the mother support her daughter or her boyfriend?
Is this your first time hearing about this case? There’s a whole thread here that you can read, with links.
Why are you afraid to answer the question?
You’re here on a thread full of answers to your questions.
Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?
Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the girl’s rapist in prison?
Did anyone care about putting the rapist where he belongs? I remember he was live-in boyfriend of the girl’s mother. Did the mother support her daughter or her boyfriend?
Is this your first time hearing about this case? There’s a whole thread here that you can read, with links.
Why are you afraid to answer the question?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the girl’s rapist in prison?
Did anyone care about putting the rapist where he belongs? I remember he was live-in boyfriend of the girl’s mother. Did the mother support her daughter or her boyfriend?
Is this your first time hearing about this case? There’s a whole thread here that you can read, with links.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is rape evidence allowed to sit on a shelf for 60 days?
Because there are way more rapes than there are hours in a day for the few qualified experts to analyze the DNA evidence? Just a guess.
Regardless, any 10-year-old victim of rape should have the option not to be forced to give birth to her rapist’s baby.
No evidence of any shortage of forensic specialists.
Rape victims simply don’t qualify as a priority for them. TRAGIC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is rape evidence allowed to sit on a shelf for 60 days?
Because there are way more rapes than there are hours in a day for the few qualified experts to analyze the DNA evidence? Just a guess.
Regardless, any 10-year-old victim of rape should have the option not to be forced to give birth to her rapist’s baby.
No evidence of any shortage of forensic specialists.
Rape victims simply don’t qualify as a priority for them. TRAGIC.