Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
They’re just books. You should see what your kids have access to on their phones
Most people would agree that exposure to porn is damaging to children. The fact that some kids access it on their phones does not mean that schools should be providing it in their libraries.
Not all descriptions of sex is pornography.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
They’re just books. You should see what your kids have access to on their phones
Most people would agree that exposure to porn is damaging to children. The fact that some kids access it on their phones does not mean that schools should be providing it in their libraries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.
Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.
Any evidence of these books being available to young children, or contain "porn"? Both books are written for teens and young adults that are at least high school age. If you're objecting to that, then I'm guessing you are the type that preaches for abstinence-only sex education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.
Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.
And these are at your local library?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.
Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.
Dp. Gender Queer and This Book is Gay are two that come to mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
They’re just books. You should see what your kids have access to on their phones
Most people would agree that exposure to porn is damaging to children. The fact that some kids access it on their phones does not mean that schools should be providing it in their libraries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
They’re just books. You should see what your kids have access to on their phones
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Graphic depictions of sex acts do not belong in schools. It boggles my mind that this is not universally agreed to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Sexual content is not pornography. And reading about sexuality or sexual experiences through literature is much better than learning about it through gossip or actual porn on the internet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Which titles do you think are “porn” and have “questionable sexual content”? Titles, not a wave of the christofascist hand.
Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?
Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone be opposed to getting porn and books with questionable sexual content out of schools?