Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 100% sure Trump will pardon Maxwell at the end of his term. She will be secreted out of the country immediately to keep her mouth shut.

I hope he does because it will destroy the Republican party forever!

Wishful thinking.
It wont have any impact on MAGA. Stories will get spun, they’ll get distracted. They may not even know who Maxwell is.

I am going to say anyone who think this is a dem vs. repub issue is low IQ. They are all in this together, you are being forced to fight over whose party is the "guilty" one and whose is clean. Hopium? Wanting to believe there in an entire huge part of people who are the "good guys"? You must also believe in Batman.

You have to admit this looks more like a coastal elite deficiency than say a working class mid-west problem. We don't even have billionaires or massage parlors there.

Um, LOL there are plenty of billionaires in the midwest: DeVos, Waltons, Koch brothers, Buffet, the Johnsons, and on and on.

There are 11 billionaires in Kansas and Missouri alone worth a total of $120 BILLION.

Les Wexner, the man who funded Epstein, lives in Ohio.

Anonymous wrote:I know separation of powers and all, but would it be possible for Congress to pass a law so that Trump cannot pardon anyone associated with this Epstein horror show?

The obvious solution is to a arrest Trump first.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Epstein's FedEx invoices could also be a useful source to find accomplices. Hopefully someone saved all the contacts before FedEx deleted them.

Nothing is ever really deleted. FedEx is protecting the perpetrators.

According to Reddit this means that Jared is still running the ring. There was some link to an LLC he used that Trump just used--that was tied to his jet. Also, apparently Epstein has been using Fortnite from Israel, which is also somehow tied to the Rothschilds. Finally, I'd never heard of Karyna Shuliak, who was written into Epstein's will 2 days before he died and was his final (off-record) phone call. She received all of his property, which hasn't been distributed due to legal matters. She's the Columbia dentist, and is apparently running the ring with Jared. (Two Columbia professors who were in on the grift were just fired and/or disassociated.)

Anonymous wrote:I know separation of powers and all, but would it be possible for Congress to pass a law so that Trump cannot pardon anyone associated with this Epstein horror show?

Same powers that are trying to get rid of Massie and Khanna wouldn't allow it to happen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 100% sure Trump will pardon Maxwell at the end of his term. She will be secreted out of the country immediately to keep her mouth shut.

I hope he does because it will destroy the Republican party forever!

Wishful thinking.
It wont have any impact on MAGA. Stories will get spun, they’ll get distracted. They may not even know who Maxwell is.

I am going to say anyone who think this is a dem vs. repub issue is low IQ. They are all in this together, you are being forced to fight over whose party is the "guilty" one and whose is clean. Hopium? Wanting to believe there in an entire huge part of people who are the "good guys"? You must also believe in Batman.

You have to admit this looks more like a coastal elite deficiency than say a working class mid-west problem. We don't even have billionaires or massage parlors there.

Um, LOL there are plenty of billionaires in the midwest: DeVos, Waltons, Koch brothers, Buffet, the Johnsons, and on and on.

There are 11 billionaires in Kansas and Missouri alone worth a total of $120 BILLION.

I know separation of powers and all, but would it be possible for Congress to pass a law so that Trump cannot pardon anyone associated with this Epstein horror show?

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

Erika is 100% a trafficker, and I would be my house on it. Now that we know what we know. Anyone who has ties to this admin who has/had a modeling agency, orphanage, church, or children's org in the last 20 years is/was involved.

This one is interesting. Apparently, there could be some connection between Monica and Epstein. Given that Epstein has blackmail on Trump it wouldn't be that far of a stretch that he also did the same to Clinton. And it is well known that Netanyahu used Lewinsky to blackmail Clinton into releasing Johnathan Pollard

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

No fan of Kirk but these allegations are a stretch. Let’s stay focused on the confirmed perps. There are plenty.

No the Erika Kirk stuff is actually real. She was involved with some weird Romanian orphan charity, her bosses at the Corcoran group were connected with Epstein, and she may have trafficked a 15 year old.

Stop with your insane conspiracy theories.

Wouldn’t have you called this whole Epstein fiasco a crazed conspiracy theory years ago???

Like, QAnon comet PingPong crazy!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think it's telling that once Members of Congress got a look at unredacted files, the language changed from "victims" to "survivors" - anyone else notice that? To me it's suggesting some of the sex trafficking victims may have been killed and the ones left made it out alive.

Eh. I read a lot about violence against women (work related), and this is a longtime topic of discussion in that community.

Some argue that “survivors” is the better term because it’s a strength word rather than a word focussed on trauma like “victim.” Then other people say they’d rather be identified as “victim” because it puts the responsibility on the perpetrator where it belongs.

So people tend to use both, but there is definitely a movement in favor of using “survivors” as the better term.

“Survivors” also captures the magnitude of the problem. A lone serial killer may have victims, but survivors? That puts Epstein’s ring on the level of a large natural disaster with hundreds, or even thousands, of casualties.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think it's telling that once Members of Congress got a look at unredacted files, the language changed from "victims" to "survivors" - anyone else notice that? To me it's suggesting some of the sex trafficking victims may have been killed and the ones left made it out alive.

Eh. I read a lot about violence against women (work related), and this is a longtime topic of discussion in that community.

Some argue that “survivors” is the better term because it’s a strength word rather than a word focussed on trauma like “victim.” Then other people say they’d rather be identified as “victim” because it puts the responsibility on the perpetrator where it belongs.

So people tend to use both, but there is definitely a movement in favor of using “survivors” as the better term.

It's almost the end of February. When will the autopsy be released?


The Independent (January 2026): Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says new autopsy details prove pedophile was murdered

New autopsy details to be released in February will confirm that convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein did not die by suicide in jail in 2019 as authorities say, but was murdered, according to his brother.

“Jeffrey was murdered, and more autopsy facts will be coming out in February that prove it,” Mark Epstein told NewsNation on Friday.

Mark, who identified his brother’s body after the alleged trafficker was found dead in a New York prison cell while awaiting trial, told the outlet the injuries he saw “didn’t correspond to the way his body was found hanging.”

Epstein later hired Dr. Michael Baden, a former New York City medical examiner, to observe the autopsy by city officials, and the examiner concluded in 2019 that the evidence “points to homicide rather than suicide.”

“There are only three ways to die in prison,” Mark Epstein added in his NewsNation interview. “Suicide, natural causes or murder. And Jeff was murdered. I want to know who killed him and on whose behalf?”

Imprisoned Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell has also said she believes he didn’t die by suicide.

Anonymous wrote:I was curious why Wexner's lawyer told him to stop talking, but now it makes sense

The video

"I will fking kill you if you answer another question with more than five words, okay."