Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

No fan of Kirk but these allegations are a stretch. Let’s stay focused on the confirmed perps. There are plenty.

No the Erika Kirk stuff is actually real. She was involved with some weird Romanian orphan charity, her bosses at the Corcoran group were connected with Epstein, and she may have trafficked a 15 year old.

Stop with your insane conspiracy theories.

Wouldn’t have you called this whole Epstein fiasco a crazed conspiracy theory years ago???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

No fan of Kirk but these allegations are a stretch. Let’s stay focused on the confirmed perps. There are plenty.

No the Erika Kirk stuff is actually real. She was involved with some weird Romanian orphan charity, her bosses at the Corcoran group were connected with Epstein, and she may have trafficked a 15 year old.

Stop with your insane conspiracy theories.

LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Julie K. Brown is now one of my personal heroes.

None of this would be coming to light without her work.

She shows us that being dogged and determined CAN make a difference.

Dershowitz appeared on Piers Morgan - please save the screaming about the source, thanks. Anyway. Per his usual, Dershowitz lost his mind and any remaining atom of dignity when challenged over anything by Bassem Youssef.

Of note: at 17:15, Dershowitz tells a provable lie. He says that Les Wexner did not own Victoria’s Secret “until well after the early time.” He says so to attempt to undercut the research of the reporter Ryan Grim, who appears first, and has been combing through the Epstein materials. Grim found evidence that Mossad effectively worked FOR Epstein, and in part cited Epstein’s use of planes (not yet the “Lolita Express”) Wexner used for his commercial enterprises under L Brand - Victoria’s Secret was part of L Brand beginning in 1982. Again: 1982!! Very much “early days.” But see how easily Dershowitz lies about this. He has NO CONSCIENCE whatsoever and has been emboldened over time, as so many dork male lawyers who are convinced they’re heroic, that small lies aren’t tells about their entire case and character.

Youssef isn’t a trained lawyer - he was a surgeon and he is nobody’s fool. The whole thing is a trip and a half.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IZS1dVumDIg

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

No fan of Kirk but these allegations are a stretch. Let’s stay focused on the confirmed perps. There are plenty.

No the Erika Kirk stuff is actually real. She was involved with some weird Romanian orphan charity, her bosses at the Corcoran group were connected with Epstein, and she may have trafficked a 15 year old.

Anything on Thiel yet? Can't stand that f$&ker.

Anonymous wrote:A pastor affiliated with Erika Kirk's recent public appearances has been charged with multiple counts of child trafficking, prompting online speculation about Kirk's past associations....

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/erika-kirk-trafficking-allegations-1779918

No fan of Kirk but these allegations are a stretch. Let’s stay focused on the confirmed perps. There are plenty.

I was curious why Wexner's lawyer told him to stop talking, but now it makes sense

Anonymous wrote:

Epstein's FedEx invoices could also be a useful source to find accomplices. Hopefully someone saved all the contacts before FedEx deleted them.

Nothing is ever really deleted. FedEx is protecting the perpetrators.

Anonymous wrote:

I think it's telling that once Members of Congress got a look at unredacted files, the language changed from "victims" to "survivors" - anyone else notice that? To me it's suggesting some of the sex trafficking victims may have been killed and the ones left made it out alive.

Why is this not on page 1

Happy Binders Full of Nothing Day to all who celebrate

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Julie K. Brown is now one of my personal heroes.

None of this would be coming to light without her work.

She shows us that being dogged and determined CAN make a difference.

Anonymous wrote:The sweeping generalizations are derailing this thread and causing infighting which is not productive here.

This is not a Dem vs GOP issue
It's not a coast vs midwest issue
It's not us vs them
Not all billionaires are completely immoral
Not all the folks mentioned in the files are pedos or rapists

There's no reason this whole thing shouldn't be public and transparent.

It is beyond depressing and infuriating that there are so many people in this world who don't value another person's life and dignity, especially those of children. It's not a few bad apples but a huge swath of depravity.

Don't fight each other here - we are all angry and shocked - focus that energy on the criminals: the those abusing their power and those abusing children.

But every billionaire could be if they wanted to be, and they’d get away with it, too. Because apparently the only thing stopping the ultra wealthy/powerful from hurting people, including committing crimes, is their own self-regulation.

Do you want entire class of people who can do whatever they want to whomever they want, and be protected? A class of people who are — to borrow a term from earlier this century — “too big to fail?” If not, we must consider the problem of billionaires writ large.