Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m okay with Jeff’s decision but I want to mention something....

When a CP case came on the news and I was watching with my mom, she turned to me and said what they filmed high school students having intercourse and they weren’t yet 18?

I do think for us more read and aware people we understand what this torture and abuse entails but many people...honestly do not. I chose to explain it to my mom more genetically ans she was horrified but many, many people are not aware.

Yes! Even I wonder when I hear about sex offenders. A close friends’ brother knocked up his girlfriend and her parents had him arrested and thrown in jail. He was 18 and she was 16/17. Or you hear about men urinating in public and being arrested for it.

This Duggar case went way way beyond someone watching a video of a 17 year old in a porn.

WE GET IT!!!! anyone who doesn’t already can reread the thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, am SHOCKED the judge said he could see his kids. Come on...

Reminds me of the Brock Turner judge in a way. Thinking the defendant just made a mistake and is a good guy deep down. Makes me sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m okay with Jeff’s decision but I want to mention something....

When a CP case came on the news and I was watching with my mom, she turned to me and said what they filmed high school students having intercourse and they weren’t yet 18?

I do think for us more read and aware people we understand what this torture and abuse entails but many people...honestly do not. I chose to explain it to my mom more genetically ans she was horrified but many, many people are not aware.

Yes! Even I wonder when I hear about sex offenders. A close friends’ brother knocked up his girlfriend and her parents had him arrested and thrown in jail. He was 18 and she was 16/17. Or you hear about men urinating in public and being arrested for it.

This Duggar case went way way beyond someone watching a video of a 17 year old in a porn.

Anonymous wrote:I’m okay with Jeff’s decision but I want to mention something....

When a CP case came on the news and I was watching with my mom, she turned to me and said what they filmed high school students having intercourse and they weren’t yet 18?

I do think for us more read and aware people we understand what this torture and abuse entails but many people...honestly do not. I chose to explain it to my mom more genetically ans she was horrified but many, many people are not aware.

Anonymous wrote:I, too, am SHOCKED the judge said he could see his kids. Come on...

Anonymous wrote:DP who saw a few of the graphic posts before they were removed. “Little kids and torture, not just teens showing their breasts” gives an inkling of the horror without being truly graphic. I don’t need to know all the horrific details to know there’s evil in the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Posters here did not know what the actual alleged crime is, because this thread exploded into a full blown panic attack of
“I need to bleach my brain”
“ I wish I could unread that post”
Etc etc
And to JS’s point, we don’t know exactly what he downloaded, but it has been reported the ages of the victims and that it is some of the worst of the worst by an agent working the case.
No need to click the link if you don’t want to know.

https://people.com/tv/josh-duggar-hearing-agent-reveals-timeline-child-porn-case/

I don't have to look at it, I worked as a librarian before blocking software became the norm. So much porn, so so so much super pervvy specific porn I will not describe because it's too horrific. I swear it gave me PTSD. Not to mention the guy who was harvesting people's half naked little kids photos from their unprotected social media pages and creating a database for those like him. He was reported and eventually arrested for who knows what they found on his computer at home. Good times.

JD should not be allowed anywhere near his own kids.

It’s puzzling that he would still have any sort of access. I understand innocent until proven guilty, but it seems at the very least a third party should have to be present.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Posters here did not know what the actual alleged crime is, because this thread exploded into a full blown panic attack of
“I need to bleach my brain”
“ I wish I could unread that post”
Etc etc
And to JS’s point, we don’t know exactly what he downloaded, but it has been reported the ages of the victims and that it is some of the worst of the worst by an agent working the case.
No need to click the link if you don’t want to know.

https://people.com/tv/josh-duggar-hearing-agent-reveals-timeline-child-porn-case/

I don't have to look at it, I worked as a librarian before blocking software became the norm. So much porn, so so so much super pervvy specific porn I will not describe because it's too horrific. I swear it gave me PTSD. Not to mention the guy who was harvesting people's half naked little kids photos from their unprotected social media pages and creating a database for those like him. He was reported and eventually arrested for who knows what they found on his computer at home. Good times.

JD should not be allowed anywhere near his own kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t help thinking about the OTHER wives. Imagine being young Claire Spivey, Justin’s wife. Married at 19! She might not be completely brainwashed. But imagine learning your husband’s brother is a psychopath. Does that not instill ANY fear in your heart about what you married into?

I am NOT at ALL implying that the other brothers are dangerous. I am wondering about the familial effects: wouldn’t you wonder WTF your father is law is capable of?

All who married after Josh’s molestation crimes became public, knew what they married into. Every single spouse made an intentional choice to ignore the publicly available information because fame of the family was more important.

Anonymous wrote:Posters here did not know what the actual alleged crime is, because this thread exploded into a full blown panic attack of
“I need to bleach my brain”
“ I wish I could unread that post”
Etc etc
And to JS’s point, we don’t know exactly what he downloaded, but it has been reported the ages of the victims and that it is some of the worst of the worst by an agent working the case.
No need to click the link if you don’t want to know.

https://people.com/tv/josh-duggar-hearing-agent-reveals-timeline-child-porn-case/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And maybe there needs to be a thread elsewhere.
I feel like this isn’t really appropriate for this specific forum.
Seems there is a deeper conversation that wants to be had about truth, and what we need for justice. What is too much?
How deeply do we need to stare into the abyss?
We are asking law enforcement to do that for us and they lose a piece of their souls every day.
And that could still only be a discussion in broad terms.

Which is why posts keep getting deleted. Those that desire to discuss the specifics should ask Jeff where it is appropriate to post. He’s made it clear not here.

Anonymous wrote:And maybe there needs to be a thread elsewhere.
I feel like this isn’t really appropriate for this specific forum.
Seems there is a deeper conversation that wants to be had about truth, and what we need for justice. What is too much?
How deeply do we need to stare into the abyss?
We are asking law enforcement to do that for us and they lose a piece of their souls every day.
And that could still only be a discussion in broad terms.