Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

What you posted is basically what Mueller said. He is leaving it to the Congress because it is their job.

impeachment? lol

acquittal

House of Reps impeaches (Ds) . Senate is the "court" (Rs).

You are gloating that a Russian puppet is gonna go scot free. It’s what america has come down to. The fake patriots who are brainwashed by Australian channel love a conman installed as a puppet by Putin.

Listen, moron - Stating a truth isn't gloating! It's just hysterical, however, how people are indeed living in a bubble.

two years of investigations when they KNEW the rules - You can't indict a sitting president! Nixon! hello! anyone home?

So if they want to impeach, they can. But considering how tight the Rs are - refusing to go against party line - he'll be acquitted.

sorry if the truth hurts - And no, I didn't vote for him, but yes, I am an independent and former D. So there you have it - the ability to look at both sides.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller won’t testify under oath. Why?

He is not able to say why not; just as he didn’t say they did not find things which were not there!

Don’t you get that??!?

“It is all in the report.”

-Mueller

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller won’t testify under oath. Why?

He is not able to say why not; just as he didn’t say they did not find things which were not there!

Don’t you get that??!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs will continue to focus on the trump Russia collusion, hence they still don’t have a viable candidate to win the WH.

Correction: “Trump Russia Collusion”

Anonymous wrote:Mueller won’t testify under oath. Why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

What you posted is basically what Mueller said. He is leaving it to the Congress because it is their job.

impeachment? lol

acquittal

House of Reps impeaches (Ds) . Senate is the "court" (Rs).

You are gloating that a Russian puppet is gonna go scot free. It’s what america has come down to. The fake patriots who are brainwashed by Australian channel love a conman installed as a puppet by Putin.

Anonymous wrote:
You are gloating that a Russian puppet is gonna go scot free. It’s what america has come down to. The fake patriots who are brainwashed by Australian channel love a conman installed as a puppet by Putin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

What you posted is basically what Mueller said. He is leaving it to the Congress because it is their job.

impeachment? lol

acquittal

House of Reps impeaches (Ds) . Senate is the "court" (Rs).

Anonymous wrote:If the Senate wants to acquit the President based on the evidence that will be presented, then the GOP will risk losing the Senate for a generation. Go for it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robert Mueller: "As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."


This cannot be repeated enough.

Were Trump supporters here watching something different?

And yet, this is still different from, "We found the President committed a crime, but we cannot charge him."

What you posted is basically what Mueller said. He is leaving it to the Congress because it is their job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr’s pick of Durham:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-15/barrs-investigator-john-durham-once-probed-mueller-shocking-case

Zerohedge, we're almost Breitbart.

I grew up in MA. I filled this case and remember it well

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr’s pick of Durham:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-15/barrs-investigator-john-durham-once-probed-mueller-shocking-case

Zerohedge, we're almost Breitbart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing you people didn't understand what Mueller said.

1) DOJ guidelines prevent Mueller charging a crime to a sitting president

2) The president is not exonerated

3) Our country was attacked

4) the obstruction was material to the investigation

5) This is now in the hands of the Congress

I understood it. He’s making a case for impeachment. No worries. We have the goods on Mueller. Barr got him re: Bulger and will get him again

Why are you not familiar with this?

Why do you keep bringing it up when it has nothing to do with the President's crimes.