Anonymous wrote:At some point people will think before they vote for local officials. People who want to save Wootton probably voted for the people trying to eliminate it. Go figure
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buckle up: with one testimonial online ahead of Thursday's meeting from someone who wants to provide the BOE with an "expert critique" of Option H, it's sure to be a wild ride. This gentleman, who apparently has a PhD in Educational Policy (kudos to him?) seems to not understand what is happening or how money works. He says, "My research shows that high school stability is a primary driver of postsecondary success." First of all, bruh, pretty sure all research says that. Second, Option H keeps your cluster fully intact just in a different building. Teachers are the same, although probably healthier and happier and all your kids are with their precious friends. He goes on to not understand, "why Wootton alone was selected for full-school relocation". Once again, my man, MCPS was trying to throw Wootton a bone here since y'alls aren't slated for meaningful renovation for at least 10+ years. Then comes my favorite, the money. He wants to know what the net difference is between closing Wootton ($0) and repairing (ranging from 40M for some "minor" repairs to 300M for a full rebuild). Thoughts an prayers for Thursday.
Yeah how dare people ask questions or show any concern for their school. Why do you even care? You clearly don’t live in the cluster by the language you are using to describe what’s going on.
Give us your solution as your hostility and negativity are a huge problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Laura Stewart has been pushing for bussing for years. She hates the W schools and would to see one of them closed because they are an affront to equity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not people commenting on here who will close a "W" school. It will be elected officials. And people who want to keep Wootton and the other "W" schools open probably voted for these officials. These same officials wanted to change the name of the school a couple years back. This might also be a factor. Closing the school certainly eliminates the name. Bussing was also proposed at one point. Think before you vote for these officials
There are no elected officials on the school board or county council who ever expressed wanting to change the name of Wootton. Stop making things up.
There are only two elected officials who were even in office at the time when they approved initiating a review TO SEE IF THERE WAS COMMUNITY INTEREST in changing the name of any school. There was none, so nothing happened. No elected official advocated in support of changing the name of Wootton.
Additionally, no elected official (other than one Gaithersburg city councilmember) has advocated in support of Option H. Stop making things up.
She doesn’t care but she also understands the limited opportunities at other schools, which is where budding could help some students.
Anonymous wrote:https://bethesdamagazine.com/2026/01/06/mcps-federal-funding-challenges/
Federal cutting does affect mcps funding? I thought someone says they are unrelated.
Anonymous wrote:Laura Stewart has been pushing for bussing for years. She hates the W schools and would to see one of them closed because they are an affront to equity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not people commenting on here who will close a "W" school. It will be elected officials. And people who want to keep Wootton and the other "W" schools open probably voted for these officials. These same officials wanted to change the name of the school a couple years back. This might also be a factor. Closing the school certainly eliminates the name. Bussing was also proposed at one point. Think before you vote for these officials
There are no elected officials on the school board or county council who ever expressed wanting to change the name of Wootton. Stop making things up.
There are only two elected officials who were even in office at the time when they approved initiating a review TO SEE IF THERE WAS COMMUNITY INTEREST in changing the name of any school. There was none, so nothing happened. No elected official advocated in support of changing the name of Wootton.
Additionally, no elected official (other than one Gaithersburg city councilmember) has advocated in support of Option H. Stop making things up.
Anonymous wrote:You mean move it to a new building miles from the original, change the name, change the student body, and probably change the admin and teachers. In other words, eliminate Wootton and open Crown. Just admit that you want one less W school.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At some point people will think before they vote for local officials. People who want to save Wootton probably voted for the people trying to eliminate it. Go figure
No one is eliminating it. They are offering to move it to a new building per the parents tantrums. Other schools are just as bad or worse.
Laura Stewart has been pushing for bussing for years. She hates the W schools and would to see one of them closed because they are an affront to equity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not people commenting on here who will close a "W" school. It will be elected officials. And people who want to keep Wootton and the other "W" schools open probably voted for these officials. These same officials wanted to change the name of the school a couple years back. This might also be a factor. Closing the school certainly eliminates the name. Bussing was also proposed at one point. Think before you vote for these officials
There are no elected officials on the school board or county council who ever expressed wanting to change the name of Wootton. Stop making things up.
There are only two elected officials who were even in office at the time when they approved initiating a review TO SEE IF THERE WAS COMMUNITY INTEREST in changing the name of any school. There was none, so nothing happened. No elected official advocated in support of changing the name of Wootton.
Additionally, no elected official (other than one Gaithersburg city councilmember) has advocated in support of Option H. Stop making things up.
Anonymous wrote:It is not people commenting on here who will close a "W" school. It will be elected officials. And people who want to keep Wootton and the other "W" schools open probably voted for these officials. These same officials wanted to change the name of the school a couple years back. This might also be a factor. Closing the school certainly eliminates the name. Bussing was also proposed at one point. Think before you vote for these officials
Anonymous wrote:At some point people will think before they vote for local officials. People who want to save Wootton probably voted for the people trying to eliminate it. Go figure
You mean move it to a new building miles from the original, change the name, change the student body, and probably change the admin and teachers. In other words, eliminate Wootton and open Crown. Just admit that you want one less W school.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At some point people will think before they vote for local officials. People who want to save Wootton probably voted for the people trying to eliminate it. Go figure
No one is eliminating it. They are offering to move it to a new building per the parents tantrums. Other schools are just as bad or worse.
Anonymous wrote:Buckle up: with one testimonial online ahead of Thursday's meeting from someone who wants to provide the BOE with an "expert critique" of Option H, it's sure to be a wild ride. This gentleman, who apparently has a PhD in Educational Policy (kudos to him?) seems to not understand what is happening or how money works. He says, "My research shows that high school stability is a primary driver of postsecondary success." First of all, bruh, pretty sure all research says that. Second, Option H keeps your cluster fully intact just in a different building. Teachers are the same, although probably healthier and happier and all your kids are with their precious friends. He goes on to not understand, "why Wootton alone was selected for full-school relocation". Once again, my man, MCPS was trying to throw Wootton a bone here since y'alls aren't slated for meaningful renovation for at least 10+ years. Then comes my favorite, the money. He wants to know what the net difference is between closing Wootton ($0) and repairing (ranging from 40M for some "minor" repairs to 300M for a full rebuild). Thoughts an prayers for Thursday.
Anonymous wrote:With all these schools in disrepair, do we need to raise property taxes even more? Again would that not be what our elected officials would say.