Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.
The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.
IMO - worse than the drunk driving charge is him trying to claim to be deaf to get out of it.
Anonymous wrote:paying a porn star her bill of service is a big deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Do you not understand what Trump’s 34 felony convictions are for? He wasn’t paying a sex worker for sex, he was paying her to keep quiet so he could win an election. And now he’s a convicted felon.
Oh gee. What a horrible crime. He really put citizens in harms way with this one.
Anonymous wrote:Pandering to the left wing of the party, solid move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What shouldn’t be lost in today’s news cycle is that the governor of a crucial swing state was humiliated by being skipped over for this nomination. And why? Because the anti-Israel activists in the party would have gone even more crazy due to Shapiro’s presence on the ticket. So don’t be at all surprised when the late night Philly magic doesn’t happen on election night.
This was exactly my reaction to this news. How you all are celebrating the anti-semitism of the far left that this choice has given its stamp of approval for is beyond me. This is not a "unifying" choice, unless your version of the Democratic party expunges a whole lot of Jews. PA is going to go to Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally I wanted Kelly, because I was ready for VPOTUS who’s been in space to counter the Elon wannabes, but I’m so relieved it’s not Shapiro and we don’t have to spend the next 90 days dissecting his views on Palestinians and can instead just focus on winning the election. This was a savvy choice.
I think Kelly was a better choice. I like Walz but he's not exciting, and Americans are so superficial and want exciting.
Have you heard Kelly speak? He’s about as exciting as rock.🪨
This was Kelly’s problem IMO.
It wasn’t his main problem. Harris couldn’t lose his senate seat. Would require a special election to replace him. Not sure if that’s a risk to take with a stacked court. I mean Johnson is threatening a lawsuit against Biden finishing his term. Biden went to great lengths to time his step down. After RNC and before DNC. Legally, delegates and campaign funds transferred to Harris in plenty of time for nominee certificate. After RNC was stealth move as JD was already nominee and together with Trump their entire shtick was bashing Biden. Laugh with me pp!!
I just don't buy that. AZ's Democratic governor would appoint another Dem to Kelly's seat. The special election wouldn't be until 2026, plenty of time to solidify support in a state that seems to be trending increasingly purple, if not blue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.
The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.
IMO - worse than the drunk driving charge is him trying to claim to be deaf to get out of it.
That was looked into and he does have hearing loss in both ears and even had surgery for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz was arrested and booked for Driving Under the Influence in Nebraska in 1995.
He was serving in the National Guard at that time- why was he allowed to keep his career? DUI/DWI is a career ending event.
How about rape?
Don’t ask, don’t tell.
In 1999, Walz agreed to be the faculty advisor of the first gay-straight alliance at Mankato West High School. In the 90s, when it wasn't easy. He said something to the effect that of course he would do it, since the backing of the straight, older, football coach should show others that being an ally was the right thing to do.
That's real f'in leadership.
Am I the only one who thinks of Little House on the Prairie anytime someone says Mankato?
Who cares about a student club he sponsored at a HS almost 30 years ago. That has no relationship to his qualifications for Vice President.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What shouldn’t be lost in today’s news cycle is that the governor of a crucial swing state was humiliated by being skipped over for this nomination. And why? Because the anti-Israel activists in the party would have gone even more crazy due to Shapiro’s presence on the ticket. So don’t be at all surprised when the late night Philly magic doesn’t happen on election night.
Honey, you are so desperate. You have spent the entire day writing posts about Governor Shapiro as though he had been wronged. There were several people on that list. You don't care about them?
The Republicans are very upset that Harris went with the most magnetic and pragmatic choice and, after dropping hints it was going to be Shapiro, slapped the GOP around by not going with him. And after they spent all that time and money coming up with various antisemtic attacks and now they don’t get to use them!
Anonymous wrote:
Do you not understand what Trump’s 34 felony convictions are for? He wasn’t paying a sex worker for sex, he was paying her to keep quiet so he could win an election. And now he’s a convicted felon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.
The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP
I’m fine with them. Pretty sure they’ve been around for longer than I have, and we are not a socialist country.
But good try.
Pp here. I support them as well. But they are “socialist” policies. I’m tired of people saying how much they hate “socialism” when they clearly support a lot of “socialist” policies.