Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would be heard in a matter of weeks or months rather than years, if the GOP reformed the administrative system and funding it, like the Lankford bill calls for.

But no, the GOP wants all of these asylum seekers here indefinitely and make people angry about it.

Right! The current law doesn't allow us to just kick them out en masse and for some reason the MAGAs don't understand that. The law requires they get hearings first and the Lankford bill would allow all of that to be expedited.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I cannot stand this wing of the Dem party. I don't like the use of the term either, but for heaven's sake, they cannot see the forest from the trees and do this absolute stupidity during an election year. Do they honestly think they are helping anyone. Do they think that getting Trump re-elected will help the dignity of people trying to come to the US? Get Biden re-elected and then when he's a second term president, go back to your nitpicking. They need to STFU.

Anonymous wrote:They would be heard in a matter of weeks or months rather than years, if the GOP reformed the administrative system and funding it, like the Lankford bill calls for.

But no, the GOP wants all of these asylum seekers here indefinitely and make people angry about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

You guys can lie all you want, but it's still nonsense. No one is apologizing to a murderer. It's a discussion of use of a term to be applied to a broad group of people, 99.9% of which are not murderers (or rapists) despite what you and the GOP propaganda machine keep saying. Sorry your pea brain can't handle any real discussion of issues.

It was stupid for him to apologize, but you are FOS. Trump is the weak whiny baby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

Everyone knew that border bill was a sham. It “allowed” 5000 illegals to cross EVERY DAY! That is NOT the solution we’re looking for.

I hear your shrieking and your frustration. But I think you lost this as your issue. Sorry?

It was a bipartisan bill. You tanked it because your poopy dictator got big mad that the border might actually get better - and I think we can see that he's not exactly brimming with deep thoughts about other ways American life could use his attention.

No. It was tanked - thankfully- because it was in no way a solution. If anything it could have made matters worse. You really think we should just accept 5k new illegals every day?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

Everyone knew that border bill was a sham. It “allowed” 5000 illegals to cross EVERY DAY! That is NOT the solution we’re looking for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

Everyone knew that border bill was a sham. It “allowed” 5000 illegals to cross EVERY DAY! That is NOT the solution we’re looking for.

I hear your shrieking and your frustration. But I think you lost this as your issue. Sorry?

It was a bipartisan bill. You tanked it because your poopy dictator got big mad that the border might actually get better - and I think we can see that he's not exactly brimming with deep thoughts about other ways American life could use his attention.

No. It was tanked - thankfully- because it was in no way a solution. If anything it could have made matters worse. You really think we should just accept 5k new illegals every day?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

LOL. You keep telling yourself that, Jill. It was a disaster and everyone knows it.

Trump is a disaster and Biden is the ticket to protect the country.. this is the same as 2020 only trump is even more exposed as a crook.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

Everyone knew that border bill was a sham. It “allowed” 5000 illegals to cross EVERY DAY! That is NOT the solution we’re looking for.

I hear your shrieking and your frustration. But I think you lost this as your issue. Sorry?

It was a bipartisan bill. You tanked it because your poopy dictator got big mad that the border might actually get better - and I think we can see that he's not exactly brimming with deep thoughts about other ways American life could use his attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Immigration and the subsequent crime issues are far and away the major issues for voters this year.

Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing when they decided not to vote for the border bill thanks to Trump demanding they forego it. You don't get to do that while also saying you're the only ones taking this thing seriously. I think you gave Dems the win here by just cravenly refusing to actually work on solutions to the issues you keep claiming are so important.

Crime issues? I dunno. You keep trying to make that your winning issue. I feel like you keep losing elections with it, though. Not saying people aren't concerned about crime. I just think outside of MAGA world, it's not a great issue for you because you are running a criminal as your guy. You'd have better luck with crime if you seemed to actually care about crime. I think? We'll see?

I think you guys were running on "Biden's old!" and will keep trying to make that work - but it was undermined at the SOTU. Let's see if people forget that he did well and you can go back to that one. Not impossible.

I *think* reproductive rights and saving democracy are the big ones this time. We'll see I guess!

"Well we'll see, first of all. But Rs lost immigration as their thing " - maybe in your small world.

Again, we'll see! Shoulda had a vote on the border bill. That's what this regular old normie moderate thinks.