Anonymous wrote:
- that the conversation was on signal in the first place, which at best wasn’t approved for classified info and most likely was deliberately chosen as a communications platform to avoid accountability, and

-

The government doesn't have anything better. They have special hardware and live conversation, but nothing better for people who are all over the place with different devices.

Anonymous wrote:GA Senator Jon Osseff should be on everyone’s radar. He’s got what it takes to run in 2028. Young gun slaughtered them.

Finally!!!
May he inspire others find their spines.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This happened on purpose to clog the airwaves and distract from other stuff.

If you believe this, you don't understand the gravity of the mistake.

Exactly. It’s like setting your house on fire to distract the HOA from noticing that your grass is too long.

Anonymous wrote:The bros are starting to weigh in

Bro’s gotten a portion of it right. But he’s pretty fixated on the mistake of adding Goldberg to the chat, while missing:

- that the conversation was on signal in the first place, which at best wasn’t approved for classified info and most likely was deliberately chosen as a communications platform to avoid accountability, and

- doing so endangered military personnel, and

- once caught, national security leaders at the highest level lied under oath.

You’re part of the way, Dave. Keep going,

Anonymous wrote:Goldberg said the chat had
“precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing.”

Was Goldberg telling the truth when he wrote this, or was this exaggeration?

Anonymous wrote:Karoline Leavitt is doubling down. She is so breathtakingly stupid.

Were we told how Goldberg was added to the group? I use Signal for work sometimes and to add group members, I usually type in a name, which pulls the contact from my phone contacts, or I type in a phone number, if that person isn't in my contacts. So Waltz either had Goldberg in his contacts, but he's said he wouldn't know who Goldberg was even if he saw him, or he typed a phone number meant for someone else, but it ended up being Goldberg's number.

I'm open to other suggestions about how people get added to groups on Signal.

Oh dear. They filed a lawsuit against people over this, which shut down the questions they could answer to Congress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmao. They drew Donald’s favorite judge in the lawsuit

You’ll never hear it from the right, but Boasberg was Kavanaugh’s roommate and was appointed by George W. Bush. He also ordered the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails and dismissed a case calling for Trump to release his taxes.

really?!

Really.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna196954

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Senator Jon Osseff should be on everyone’s radar. He’s got what it takes to run in 2028. Young gun slaughtered them.

I did not know anything about him before watching that. I want to know everything about him now. That is the kind of voice we need.

Same here!

Anonymous wrote:They realized they weren't going to bring down Trump or anyone else with this so they went ahead and published the messages.

No, they published the messages because multiple intelligence officials at the highest level claimed under oath that nothing in the chat should have been considered classified.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmao. They drew Donald’s favorite judge in the lawsuit

You’ll never hear it from the right, but Boasberg was Kavanaugh’s roommate and was appointed by George W. Bush. He also ordered the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails and dismissed a case calling for Trump to release his taxes.

really?!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are members of congress currently testifying under oath? I have only watched clips of testimony. If not they should be and should know they will be prosecuted if lying.

Goldberg's article was timed to be dropped like a bomb one day before the testimony of Gabbard and Ratcliffe.

WSJ did this all the time with Biden and Obama appointees - they'd have a controversial story drop 1-2 days before the principals were set to testify to Congress as part of their regular schedule.

NGL, I'm surprised Trump is even still allowing his appointees to testify to Congress. That will probably stop before the end of year.

This isn't a new, why do you infer it is just a Biden or Trump thing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This happened on purpose to clog the airwaves and distract from other stuff.

I listen to Dan Abrams’ show on Sirius and there were a few callers who suggested this might be the case. I agree that Trump overall uses distraction constantly and that it’s pretty effective but there’s no way that’s what happened here.

Trump put out several executive orders to distract from this, but this is still going to be the story of the week, if not longer. This isn’t their typical distraction behavior, he has angered military and intelligence personnel. They usually only distract with things attacking the left.

Anonymous wrote:Lmao. They drew Donald’s favorite judge in the lawsuit

You’ll never hear it from the right, but Boasberg was Kavanaugh’s roommate and was appointed by George W. Bush. He also ordered the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails and dismissed a case calling for Trump to release his taxes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This happened on purpose to clog the airwaves and distract from other stuff.

I listen to Dan Abrams’ show on Sirius and there were a few callers who suggested this might be the case. I agree that Trump overall uses distraction constantly and that it’s pretty effective but there’s no way that’s what happened here.

+1 Absolutely no way

This is a HUGE mistake that will have many repercussions.