Anonymous wrote:As someone who competes against Yorktown on a regular basis (but not district play), I agree the player we are all discussing is an amazing player. If you want to start looking at schedules, how about a school like Independence or Loudon Valley who steam roll everyone simply because they are fortunate enough to have players with club experience vice other high schools who are teaching players the sport for the first time. Yorktown has been up there at the top for these last few years and as much as it pains me to say it, they deserve it.
Anonymous wrote:First off congratulations to all the girls on the list! My issue is it never has enough detail to complain about. The first team selections have a write up and you can read and for the most point understand what each player accomplished tho be on this list. Sometimes it is more how the team responded to the play and achieve a team championship. Sometimes impact players are not the ones you think of first but without them the team suffers. My issue is we never have enough space to read what the coach submitted for consideration of second team and honorable mentions. Each girl should be proud of that and the nomination for such an award. Now not criticizing the player but Leonardtown MD is all metro? How far away can you be? How com Stafford teams are not considered? Annapolis? Maybe the Post has high readership in Leonardtown.
Anonymous wrote:Well, once again the Washington Post All-Met section shows itself to be completely political and not based on actual player strength. I have no dog in this fight… my player is at the college level now. But I could not help but notice that the top player in the area—without question, committed to the 2nd best college program in the country, USA field hockey U18 National team, selected for Honorable mention. Meanwhile ISL players who can’t get a single look from a d1, players for lower level VA publics are first and second team? Somebody help me understand how this happens, year after year? Are other sports this off?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the NCAA changes the funding like I have heard for field hockey scholarships then the game changer will be that U.S. will have to directly compete against the International girls for Roster spots. In this this blog International girls have been touted as amazing and on a different level. Schools that have deep pockets and desire to win will place as many as they can. Then the
max 100s will see where the compare against them. Now I see field hockey as a losing money sport for a college so many schools will still go get the girls willing to pay for their education and play. D3s will be for all the USA girls since they offer only merit aid and the prestige for playing for that school. D2 still too small to matter one way or the other.
I do think goalies in America have the best chance with dedicated training like the The Goalie trainer and also many girls coming from soccer or ice hockey . Most clubs it seems are not doing much for them so it is on parents to pay and make decisions on training required
Throwing this is also but many more colleges have good Lacrosse programs searching for mostly US talent. Many FH girls play both and if are athletic the transition is that far off. In the DMV one of the best Field Hockey player is actually a soccer star..
Different skill level (lower) for lacrosse plus college rosters are much larger, also way more injuries.
^^^ 100% agree. Girls pickup lacrosse in high school and can leapfrog in ability over club players pretty quickly. You will also see a lot of girls commit to D1 lacrosse schools who are pretty mediocre athletes in general. It’s a weird sport and say what you will, the D1 money for lacrosse is not as much as you think it would be. But at least mummy and daddy can say DD is a D1 lacrosse commit!
Anonymous wrote:If the NCAA changes the funding like I have heard for field hockey scholarships then the game changer will be that U.S. will have to directly compete against the International girls for Roster spots. In this this blog International girls have been touted as amazing and on a different level. Schools that have deep pockets and desire to win will place as many as they can. Then the
max 100s will see where the compare against them. Now I see field hockey as a losing money sport for a college so many schools will still go get the girls willing to pay for their education and play. D3s will be for all the USA girls since they offer only merit aid and the prestige for playing for that school. D2 still too small to matter one way or the other.
I do think goalies in America have the best chance with dedicated training like the The Goalie trainer and also many girls coming from soccer or ice hockey . Most clubs it seems are not doing much for them so it is on parents to pay and make decisions on training required
Throwing this is also but many more colleges have good Lacrosse programs searching for mostly US talent. Many FH girls play both and if are athletic the transition is that far off. In the DMV one of the best Field Hockey player is actually a soccer star..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the NCAA changes the funding like I have heard for field hockey scholarships then the game changer will be that U.S. will have to directly compete against the International girls for Roster spots. In this this blog International girls have been touted as amazing and on a different level. Schools that have deep pockets and desire to win will place as many as they can. Then the
max 100s will see where the compare against them. Now I see field hockey as a losing money sport for a college so many schools will still go get the girls willing to pay for their education and play. D3s will be for all the USA girls since they offer only merit aid and the prestige for playing for that school. D2 still too small to matter one way or the other.
I do think goalies in America have the best chance with dedicated training like the The Goalie trainer and also many girls coming from soccer or ice hockey . Most clubs it seems are not doing much for them so it is on parents to pay and make decisions on training required
Throwing this is also but many more colleges have good Lacrosse programs searching for mostly US talent. Many FH girls play both and if are athletic the transition is that far off. In the DMV one of the best Field Hockey player is actually a soccer star..
Different skill level (lower) for lacrosse plus college rosters are much larger, also way more injuries.