Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

I'm not an abortion or political scholar, but don't pro-choice argue banning abortion has a much broader impact than just forcing more [poor/unwanted] babies into the world? I believe they argue abortion is a negative sin that casts a dark cloud of society and brings down society overall. It's much broader than your theoretical [more] welfare babies with drug addict parents. They also argue it makes people more responsible for their actions? More selective about sexual partners; less promiscuity? Things like that.

I’m arguing it as one point among many.
I’m arguing because I can.
I’m arguing it because people who are pro life don’t see beyond the fetus.
I’m arguing because crap can happen to anyone.
I’m arguing because I was molested by my father. If I’d gotten pregnant and he’d had to sign off it would t have happened.
I’m arguing it because less promiscuity means nothing to me.
I’m arguing it.
You seem to have no rebuttal.
Where is the social safety net for these fetuses once they become an actual baby?
Where is your heart is it just a fetal pole? Unformed not really beating?

Anonymous wrote:

I like how she ignored the fact that the memo also said that abortion rights protests and abortion clinics were expected to be particular targets.

The fear isn't about violence from the left. It's about violence from the right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

Isn't TN last in the country in education?

Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

Did you know that Ginnie Thomas is childless. She and Clarence Thomas have no kids together. Thomas’s son from a previous marriage to a black woman bo longer has a relationship with him.

Mitch McConnell is no longer on speaking terms with his daughters from his first marriage. He has no children with Elaine Chao.

Kinda weird that we have so many childless rightwing elites or those estranged from their own families making policies on this stuff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.

We have no guns in our home. When you throw out unsubstantiated accusations, your argument is meaningless.

Don't care if you don't have it in your home.

YOu're ok with other people getting them without any restrictions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

My two children exist because I was able to abort the pregnancy that would have killed me. You think my two living, breathing children should not exist and that I should be dead?

Yeah, you can burn in hell too.

Most of those 63 million weren't aborted due to dire situations and reasons similar to yours.

You have no idea why those fetuses were aborted, and it’s none. Of. Your. Business.

What is it with you people and your obsession with fetuses? You know that 1/3 of pregnancies are spontaneously aborted in the first trimester right? Is each one a loss to be mourned like a real live person who has experienced the world and had relationships with people in it? Of course not. Such weirdos.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the mindset of far right Catholic Taliban institution Georgetown Prep as seen in Kavanaugh and Gorsuch is pervasive across the current student body and teaching staff today. Just a vile institution filled with primarily the silver spooned sons of greedy white supremacists. Same goes with Amy Coney Barrett's Notre Dame.

And also dishonesty.

Youngkin's son goes to Georgetown Prep I believe.

"Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) said he will seek to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, moving quickly following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Friday overturning the constitutional right to an abortion."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling

There is no need for cruelty.

Children do not choose their parents.

Leave Youngkin's family alone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

Why is this an issue. Is this a another “motherhood is magical” thing? Because she can certainly comprehend that she wants to make her own choices for her life without being married with a child.

What a stupid post.

Motherhood is magical. Parenthood is magical and it changes you in profound ways. AOC is immature and has zero comprehension of what she's fighting for. Sorry, it's bad optics. I am pro-life but I have lots of pro-choice friends and family. I just honestly think AOC or any other childless person leading this movement in any way is really, really awful optics for your cause.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

My two children exist because I was able to abort the pregnancy that would have killed me. You think my two living, breathing children should not exist and that I should be dead?

Yeah, you can burn in hell too.

Most of those 63 million weren't aborted due to dire situations and reasons similar to yours.

How do you know? How is it any of your business?

God, I really hope your kid will end up a teen parent.

🙄

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.

We have no guns in our home. When you throw out unsubstantiated accusations, your argument is meaningless.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm on board with this. DC restaurant owners and stores should refuse service. Kids sports leagues-same. Gyms-same. Hotels, airlines.

Thankfully this would be illegal.

But talk about hypocritical… someone you disagree with? Shame them. Someone you dislike? Shun them! You’re suggesting pasting on Scarlett As

Why would this be illegal?

A restaurant owner can refuse to serve anyone s/he wants. it's a private business. Airlines can refuse to fly certain people. Why not? Any private business can refuse to serve people if they choose as long as they are not discriminating on the basis of sex, age, race, sexual orientation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

My two children exist because I was able to abort the pregnancy that would have killed me. You think my two living, breathing children should not exist and that I should be dead?

Yeah, you can burn in hell too.

Most of those 63 million weren't aborted due to dire situations and reasons similar to yours.

How do you know? How is it any of your business?

God, I really hope your kid will end up a teen parent.

For those who have not been keeping up, this is not about babies it’s about holding on to power.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left did this to themselves by insisting on aborting up until full term birth (gross). Now states will rightly decide.

I would encourage you to read more about late-term abortions who has them and what they actually entail because it doesn't seem like you know the facts

I know someone who had to give birth to a dead baby. It was beyond horrible, and it has scarred her and her husband for life.

This will happen more and more when women can't have an abortion before viability, when life-threatening defects in the fetus are discovered.

Yes, it will. And the anti-women's health crowd will say too bad. Because they don't care about women. I went to Catholic school and I heard all about this in religion classes. They really, truly don't care about real people's lived experience.

They don’t care, at all. It’s all waved away, doesn’t matter. “Give it to God.” Forced birthers do not care about the kind of misery, pain, poverty and destroyed lives that they’re causing.

Will never forget the horrific story a nun once told us about a family with 5 children whose mother was told not to get pregnant again, she did, was told it would kill her, it did. "But that family just loved that baby." And then 6 children grew up motherless. I remember thinking "f that." What a terrible lesson to teach. That women are only important as vessels of gestation.

There is nothing about being a nun that actually requires kindness or compassion. Many lack both.

There is actually a Catholic saint with a similar story who is, I guess, what the Church considers a good role model for women and mothers. Gianna Beretta Molla developed a complication during her 4th pregnancy that necessitated an abortion and possible hysterectomy to save her life. She declined and died a week after giving birth. I’ve always found the story both tragic and horrifying. The fact that the Catholic Church finds this to be an acceptable outcome of such a situation is infuriating.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

My two children exist because I was able to abort the pregnancy that would have killed me. You think my two living, breathing children should not exist and that I should be dead?

Yeah, you can burn in hell too.

Most of those 63 million weren't aborted due to dire situations and reasons similar to yours.