Anonymous
02/13/2026 16:14
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 16:11
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:With everything that has come out in the files, I can’t even believe nothing is being done. Every single person in those files should be rounded up and investigated. How are they still walking free? Even just knowing about this ring and not doing anything about it is a crime. The reason that this is divisive is simply because of Trump being a republican politician. That makes it partisan. If he was still just a weird reality tv host and NY socialite wannabe, nobody would be defending him or making excuses for him. He would have been locked up a long time ago. He was somehow smart enough to know that calling yourself a republican will ensure that half the country will defend everything you do and will believe that you can do no wrong.
+1000%
Anonymous
02/13/2026 16:07
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had an epiphony about DEI and JE. Merit never existed. DEI created a system where an individual had to prove that they were qualified. Regular people fell for the lie that DEI needed to go away so that we could get back to a merit system that NEVER ACTUALLY EXISTED. What JE files let us see, is that the rich secret society of people like to make the rules that benefit them. Think about this. Women get 2% of venture capital. A tiny program for black women was eliminated b/c it "excluded" white men and women. But in the files we find out that rich people just hook each other up. You need $100m? Meet my banker at JP Morgan and it's done. There is no such thing as merit. It's called your relationships and if you aren't in the club, you are screwed. DEI made them open up the club and they didn't like it. It created merit.
That’s why DEI is stupid because it’s really about money and not skin color.
DEI was about women, not just race.
Sure but a white man from a poor family is not given any favors by people like JE just because they have white skin. You need to be a billionaire in order to join that club.
JD Vance was. Are you forgetting that his benefactor is Peter Theil?
JD Vance who was attending Yale when he was chosen by Theil? Yeah that was about way more than skin color lol.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 16:04
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Has the House subpoenaed Alice Fisher to testify? IIRC she was considered for FBI Director (!) in Trump’s first term so she may be still around, unlike Ken Starr.
Nope. She's FedSoc and even though all her communications on this are government records they've never seen the light of day. It is a good example of how Congress has failed. They've been all about the big names and theatrics. I have no sympathy for Acosta but he got scapegoated for what Fisher did.
This is going to come across as snarky, but how do you/we know that Fisher was the one responsible? Serious question. Acosta has yet to testify although he’s coming I think.
She was the AAG in charge of it. DOJ went over the heads of the local prosecutors. Epstein files also indicate that Starr was talking directly to her and pinning her as the decision maker.
Oh, and there's also a credible whistleblower document from a DOJ insider claiming that she buried the documents that would prove everything.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:59
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Has the House subpoenaed Alice Fisher to testify? IIRC she was considered for FBI Director (!) in Trump’s first term so she may be still around, unlike Ken Starr.
Nope. She's FedSoc and even though all her communications on this are government records they've never seen the light of day. It is a good example of how Congress has failed. They've been all about the big names and theatrics. I have no sympathy for Acosta but he got scapegoated for what Fisher did.
This is going to come across as snarky, but how do you/we know that Fisher was the one responsible? Serious question. Acosta has yet to testify although he’s coming I think.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:55
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
Visa fraud for a start.
But what they need to start with are all the side piece academics and professionals. Follow the crumbs up the ladder.
This is basically a mob RICO case but on a much more prominent scale. If the FBI wasn’t gutted, they could build it out.
But this circle definitely corrupted law enforcement and prosecutors.
In some ways this is more of a job for Congress. Get these low level people under oath and start figuring out how they met etc
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:34
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
Visa fraud for a start.
But what they need to start with are all the side piece academics and professionals. Follow the crumbs up the ladder.
This is basically a mob RICO case but on a much more prominent scale. If the FBI wasn’t gutted, they could build it out.
But this circle definitely corrupted law enforcement and prosecutors.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:25
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
One of the best explainers on Who is Jeffery Epstein. Narrator lays out decades of the history, facts, and reporting of the Epstein case—clearly, chronologically, and in one place.
This is not about conspiracy theories or salacious details. What we have instead is a documented record showing how, for more than a decade, the justice system worked to protect Jeffrey Epstein and his associates while survivors and advocates and journalists fought to expose the truth.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-epstein-files-explained-everything-you-need-to/id1564530722?i=1000749023113
Interview with lawyer who exposed the conspiracy Brad Edwards
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4TIYwyYM8BwfVwe5CSnPf7
This is much bigger than Trump. The survivors deserves answers HOW this happened. Hint, too many immoral people in positions of power.
This is not about conspiracy theories or salacious details. What we have instead is a documented record showing how, for more than a decade, the justice system worked to protect Jeffrey Epstein and his associates while survivors and advocates and journalists fought to expose the truth.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-epstein-files-explained-everything-you-need-to/id1564530722?i=1000749023113
Interview with lawyer who exposed the conspiracy Brad Edwards
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4TIYwyYM8BwfVwe5CSnPf7
This is much bigger than Trump. The survivors deserves answers HOW this happened. Hint, too many immoral people in positions of power.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:16
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Has the House subpoenaed Alice Fisher to testify? IIRC she was considered for FBI Director (!) in Trump’s first term so she may be still around, unlike Ken Starr.
Nope. She's FedSoc and even though all her communications on this are government records they've never seen the light of day. It is a good example of how Congress has failed. They've been all about the big names and theatrics. I have no sympathy for Acosta but he got scapegoated for what Fisher did.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 15:06
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
Visa fraud for a start.
But what they need to start with are all the side piece academics and professionals. Follow the crumbs up the ladder.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 14:37
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Has the House subpoenaed Alice Fisher to testify? IIRC she was considered for FBI Director (!) in Trump’s first term so she may be still around, unlike Ken Starr.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 14:35
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
This is not at all a coherent response to my post praising Julie Brown and also you have no idea specifically which survivors were at the hearing and when their abuse began, nor does it matter whether the people were abused were at the hearing or not. What exactly are you trying to say?
Anonymous
02/13/2026 14:32
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.
Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"
Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.
As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.
Anonymous
02/13/2026 14:28
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous
02/13/2026 14:15
Subject: Epstein Files
With everything that has come out in the files, I can’t even believe nothing is being done. Every single person in those files should be rounded up and investigated. How are they still walking free? Even just knowing about this ring and not doing anything about it is a crime. The reason that this is divisive is simply because of Trump being a republican politician. That makes it partisan. If he was still just a weird reality tv host and NY socialite wannabe, nobody would be defending him or making excuses for him. He would have been locked up a long time ago. He was somehow smart enough to know that calling yourself a republican will ensure that half the country will defend everything you do and will believe that you can do no wrong.