Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT article gift link -

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/24/style/usha-vance-maga-pregnancy-style.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.MJSB.w31mCGZqHmdB&smid=url-share

Thank you. No idea why she crashed out over this. No mention of the fact that her dress was Old Navy or what any of their wardrobes cost. She's unhinged!

Pregnancy Brain!!

Anonymous wrote:If Usha's friends actually do read here, can you all tell her to stop with the faux-Valley Girl accent and uptalk?

Anonymous wrote:NYT article gift link -

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/24/style/usha-vance-maga-pregnancy-style.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.MJSB.w31mCGZqHmdB&smid=url-share

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Girl got a $50 dress for $9? Why isn't she VP? Also, is that made-up AI? Please tell me it is. This cannot be true.

No, it's not AI. It's a real tweet from her account. In fact one of the top replies is "Coral is a great color; NYT elites don't understand midwest fashion." Like a) Usha isn't a coastal elite herself and b) no one in the history of the Acela corridor has ever worn coral.

She's a smug, odious woman who cannot help herself. Someone writes a nice article about her and her immediate instinct is to play the victim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I kind of love that everyone is turning on Big Ush. Liberals think her crashout today was insane (it was). Conservatives think her "I guess I just grew up in a stable home, so I don't need religion" comment was condescending to her husband (it was).

I said months ago she was very obviously not a nice woman and here we are.

Oh man, I did not know she said that. And I do wonder if JD Vance wrote the tweet, which could be defending her but also getting back at her in a sneaky way.

Anonymous wrote:NYT article gift link -

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/24/style/usha-vance-maga-pregnancy-style.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.MJSB.w31mCGZqHmdB&smid=url-share

Anonymous wrote:I kind of love that everyone is turning on Big Ush. Liberals think her crashout today was insane (it was). Conservatives think her "I guess I just grew up in a stable home, so I don't need religion" comment was condescending to her husband (it was).

I said months ago she was very obviously not a nice woman and here we are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean it definitely seems like JD Vance is a deeply unhappy guy who has been running from his childhood for a long time. He's a person of extraordinary capacity, so he runs really far. But you have to believe Usha isn't sure Catholicism will stick.

It is so weird to hear them talk about it though. He just seems so deeply disrespectful of her to me. I don't get how it can work.

Haven't read the book but the NYT reviewer (to be fair, NYT skews left so I'm not sure they were the target audience for a JD Vance book about becoming a tradcath) said it paints a picture of a deeply insecure man who has no idea who he is.

I actually saw a right winger on twitter say the bit between them on her podcast was awkward because you know damn well if he could do it over again he wouldn't marry Usha. He'd be married to a blue eyed blonde evangelical.

Well don't count him out yet. There's definitely still time for him to switch.

I don't think any actually attractive women want him. There's a reason Usha had to settle.

They both settled, IMO.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean it definitely seems like JD Vance is a deeply unhappy guy who has been running from his childhood for a long time. He's a person of extraordinary capacity, so he runs really far. But you have to believe Usha isn't sure Catholicism will stick.

It is so weird to hear them talk about it though. He just seems so deeply disrespectful of her to me. I don't get how it can work.

Haven't read the book but the NYT reviewer (to be fair, NYT skews left so I'm not sure they were the target audience for a JD Vance book about becoming a tradcath) said it paints a picture of a deeply insecure man who has no idea who he is.

I actually saw a right winger on twitter say the bit between them on her podcast was awkward because you know damn well if he could do it over again he wouldn't marry Usha. He'd be married to a blue eyed blonde evangelical.

Well don't count him out yet. There's definitely still time for him to switch.

I don't think any actually attractive women want him. There's a reason Usha had to settle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a miserable hag. And no one asked for your Old Navy receipt?????

Well, without the receipt, you wouldn't know that she buys XS, would you?

Oh snap!! 🔥🔥🔥

I wasn't joking. She clearly only posted that so we would see her size. The article made no mention of the cost of her clothes. There was no need to post the receipt.

She's a c-u-next-tuesday. I've said that for months. I went to a women's college. I'm very adept at sussing out when women are nice or not, and I could very quickly clock that she isn't. Melania I think prefers the company of women. Usha is very much a "I don't have women friends because they're too much drama" type. Meanwhile, she's the one causing the drama, as evidenced by melting down over a perfectly reasonable article.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean it definitely seems like JD Vance is a deeply unhappy guy who has been running from his childhood for a long time. He's a person of extraordinary capacity, so he runs really far. But you have to believe Usha isn't sure Catholicism will stick.

It is so weird to hear them talk about it though. He just seems so deeply disrespectful of her to me. I don't get how it can work.

Haven't read the book but the NYT reviewer (to be fair, NYT skews left so I'm not sure they were the target audience for a JD Vance book about becoming a tradcath) said it paints a picture of a deeply insecure man who has no idea who he is.

I actually saw a right winger on twitter say the bit between them on her podcast was awkward because you know damn well if he could do it over again he wouldn't marry Usha. He'd be married to a blue eyed blonde evangelical.

Well don't count him out yet. There's definitely still time for him to switch.