Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.

Agree. But it’s retraumatizing.
Honestly they should all just start naming names and dare DOJ to bring charges. If they all do it, they are safer. Strike now while public attention is on their side.

What makes you think they want your agenda though?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.

Agree. But it’s retraumatizing.+Honestly they should all just start naming names and dare DOJ to bring charges. If they all do it, they are safer. Strike now while public attention is on their side.

What makes you think they want your agenda though?

DP. Is having human trafficking prosecuted an “agenda?” If so, sign me up, that is my agenda!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.

Agree. But it’s retraumatizing.
Honestly they should all just start naming names and dare DOJ to bring charges. If they all do it, they are safer. Strike now while public attention is on their side.

What makes you think they want your agenda though?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.

Agree. But it’s retraumatizing.
Honestly they should all just start naming names and dare DOJ to bring charges. If they all do it, they are safer. Strike now while public attention is on their side.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I never doubted that for a mo. They purposefully tried to redact some names of co-conspirators, and purposefully exposed victims.

Exactly.

This is a clear situation of “the thing speaks for itself.” Those redaction shenanigans are widespread in the file release.

So, the only two options are that they did it on purpose to protect the guilty and shame the victims, or they’re just grossly incompetent. Given the people in charge these days, you can never rule out incompetence. But I think there’s too much there to dismiss “outright evil” as the most likely reason.

But here’s the thing: the victims have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Absolutely nothing. They were children.

And even the ones who were technically adults have nothing to be ashamed of. It’s unlikely they had much of a choice. Making a bad decision in your late teens or early twenties is not criminal.