Anonymous wrote:If you have $10 mil laying around, why not just give that to the kid? Is Yale really that much of a bragging right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the offspring are in college and over 18 then legally they are neither children nor are they kids. They are young adults who it they were black or Hispanic would be treated as such in the press. We had a neighbor kill a family member while in college and I remember being shocked to hear him described as a man at age 19. But legally these are adults who may be complicit in racketeering etc. Not kids.
I’m sure many were 17 when their parents did this. So... kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frank Bruni's op ed.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/opinion/college-bribery-admissions.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
It may be legal to pledge $2.5 million to Harvard just as your son is applying — which is what Jared Kushner’s father did for him — and illegal to bribe a coach to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, but how much of a difference is there, really? Both elevate money over accomplishment. Both are ways of cutting in line.
It may be legal to give $50,000 to a private consultant who massages your child’s transcript and perfumes your child’s essays, and illegal to pay someone for a patently fictive test score, but aren’t both exercises in deception reserved for those who can afford them?
It's not legal to "massage" a transcript (what does this even mean)? Or "perfume" an essay.
I found it interesting that Singer posed this scam as a "side door" for parents, saying that there was the "front door" (earning admission) and the "back door" (donating to the institution & using connections), but that the back door cost 10x more and was not guaranteed.
The
Yes, it is legal to "massage" a transcript. A college counselor can make your volunteering sound really good vs. I did 100 hours at a soup kitchen. Most people have somebody "edit" their kids essay, even if it is a family memeber.
They can't change your grades -- that's what "massage" would mean to me when it comes to a transcript. Proofing is not "perfuming," that wiould be doing some rewriting for the kid which would not be legal.
Anonymous wrote:If the offspring are in college and over 18 then legally they are neither children nor are they kids. They are young adults who it they were black or Hispanic would be treated as such in the press. We had a neighbor kill a family member while in college and I remember being shocked to hear him described as a man at age 19. But legally these are adults who may be complicit in racketeering etc. Not kids.
Anonymous wrote:The Georgetown men’s and women’s tennis coach was kicked out a year ago for “admission irregularities” and ended up as the women’s coach at the U of Rhode Island. He apparently accepted over $2 million over 5 or so years as bribes to let in a couple of kids a year. Apparently, every coach has “slots” available to them for admissions and some saw it as a personal asset. You can bet this is going to get bigger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must be an East Coast version of this. Can't imagine that this is only in CA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The scheme began to fall apart in October last year when the IRS audited Key Worldwide and began to look into donations made by parents whose children were then admitted to USC. "
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6800929/Mastermind-bragged-getting-800-rich-kids-colleges.html
So, this is how s--t hit the fan! The IRS started digging and dug out enough to have this guy wear a wire and sell out his entire clientele.
There will be more names coming out, stay tuned.
That article says Singer bragged about getting 800 rich kids into elite colleges. 800!!!!
The articles talk about Georgetown U. Read?
Anonymous wrote:There must be an East Coast version of this. Can't imagine that this is only in CA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The scheme began to fall apart in October last year when the IRS audited Key Worldwide and began to look into donations made by parents whose children were then admitted to USC. "
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6800929/Mastermind-bragged-getting-800-rich-kids-colleges.html
So, this is how s--t hit the fan! The IRS started digging and dug out enough to have this guy wear a wire and sell out his entire clientele.
There will be more names coming out, stay tuned.
That article says Singer bragged about getting 800 rich kids into elite colleges. 800!!!!
Anonymous wrote:One of the parents paid $1.2 M.
That's a lot of money.
Anonymous wrote:There must be an East Coast version of this. Can't imagine that this is only in CA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The scheme began to fall apart in October last year when the IRS audited Key Worldwide and began to look into donations made by parents whose children were then admitted to USC. "
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6800929/Mastermind-bragged-getting-800-rich-kids-colleges.html
So, this is how s--t hit the fan! The IRS started digging and dug out enough to have this guy wear a wire and sell out his entire clientele.
There will be more names coming out, stay tuned.
That article says Singer bragged about getting 800 rich kids into elite colleges. 800!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The scheme began to fall apart in October last year when the IRS audited Key Worldwide and began to look into donations made by parents whose children were then admitted to USC. "
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6800929/Mastermind-bragged-getting-800-rich-kids-colleges.html
So, this is how s--t hit the fan! The IRS started digging and dug out enough to have this guy wear a wire and sell out his entire clientele.
There will be more names coming out, stay tuned.
That article says Singer bragged about getting 800 rich kids into elite colleges. 800!!!!