Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
He was not on "life support".
Depends what you mean by life support. True, he was breathing on his own (lower brain function), but he obviously was being nourished through a tube. My point is that even if they withheld that, he could have lingered for weeks. I think he may have known on some level that he was home and "let go," but the more likely scenario is that he was near death anyway, and the final plane trip overtook him. Such a sad story, either way.
[b]Apparently his family said that when he arrived in Cincinnati he seemed distressed, but that he started calming down over the following days. His parents think he knew on some level that he was back home.
[b]That's somewhat soothing, if in fact he did know he was home, but a horrible fate nonetheless. May he RIP.[/quote
+1. He was laid to rest yesterday. The Post wrote a great article, if you missed it. What a loss to the world, he sounds like a great guy. His siblings spoke at the funeral and pictures were shown of him throwing snowballs with children in North Korea. He preferred hugs to handshakes and loved to give unexpected gifts to people.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/06/22/lets-bring-it-in-otto-warmbiers-family-and-friends-celebrate-his-life/?utm_term=.23981e641eab
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
He was not on "life support".
Depends what you mean by life support. True, he was breathing on his own (lower brain function), but he obviously was being nourished through a tube. My point is that even if they withheld that, he could have lingered for weeks. I think he may have known on some level that he was home and "let go," but the more likely scenario is that he was near death anyway, and the final plane trip overtook him. Such a sad story, either way.
Apparently his family said that when he arrived in Cincinnati he seemed distressed, but that he started calming down over the following days. His parents think he knew on some level that he was back home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
He was not on "life support".
Depends what you mean by life support. True, he was breathing on his own (lower brain function), but he obviously was being nourished through a tube. My point is that even if they withheld that, he could have lingered for weeks. I think he may have known on some level that he was home and "let go," but the more likely scenario is that he was near death anyway, and the final plane trip overtook him. Such a sad story, either way.
Anonymous wrote:Cold frosty bitch. If it were your own kid ...you wouldn't say this....I know, I know...your precious snowflake would have NEVER done something like this
Anonymous wrote:he did this to himself
he stole a flag and paid the price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Why should the US government compensate his parents? Serious question. I get that we all feel terrible for them, but it's not the USG fault that Otto was in North Korea against state dept warnings. I suppose they could sue if they thought the the US government had been negligent, but I wouldn't be surprised if they actually wound up with a bill for their son's transportation.
Can we assume that you also feel this way about young men and women who make bad choices despite warnings re drug use, babies with multiple dads, burglaries and robberies, shooting innocent strangers, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Why should the US government compensate his parents? Serious question. I get that we all feel terrible for them, but it's not the USG fault that Otto was in North Korea against state dept warnings. I suppose they could sue if they thought the the US government had been negligent, but I wouldn't be surprised if they actually wound up with a bill for their son's transportation.
Can we assume that you also feel this way about young men and women who make bad choices despite warnings re drug use, babies with multiple dads, burglaries and robberies, shooting innocent strangers, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Why should the US government compensate his parents? Serious question. I get that we all feel terrible for them, but it's not the USG fault that Otto was in North Korea against state dept warnings. I suppose they could sue if they thought the the US government had been negligent, but I wouldn't be surprised if they actually wound up with a bill for their son's transportation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Why should the US government compensate his parents? Serious question. I get that we all feel terrible for them, but it's not the USG fault that Otto was in North Korea against state dept warnings. I suppose they could sue if they thought the the US government had been negligent, but I wouldn't be surprised if they actually wound up with a bill for their son's transportation.
Anonymous wrote:he did this to himself
he stole a flag and paid the price.
Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
He was not on "life support".
\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.
Who says they cut off life support? Wouldn't it have taken weeks to die rather than a few days?
Anonymous wrote:regardless, I think US government should compensate Otto's parents with some $$. They could have kept Otto on live support for another year or more on taxpayer's money but decided it's meaningless.