Anonymous wrote:Going to the university of Maryland over ANY Ivy League school is absolutely a poor choice. Who would argue with that? When you are 22, lacrosse is then OVER.
and you have an ivy league degree or a UMD degree?
Not to mention the quality of your classes, professors, curriculum, facilities, the intellectual level and intellectual curiosity of your classmates, the Ivy League connections and network.
Athletes all over the country that choose schools just like Maryland would argue with that. Some percentage of which an Ivy would trip over themselves to have. And the same.goes for students. But only you are correct, right?Anonymous wrote:Going to the university of Maryland over ANY Ivy League school is absolutely a poor choice. Who would argue with that? When you are 22, lacrosse is then OVER.
and you have an ivy league degree or a UMD degree?
Not to mention the quality of your classes, professors, curriculum, facilities, the intellectual level and intellectual curiosity of your classmates, the Ivy League connections and network.
Sure, reply to me for a simple reply to their ridiculous comment. She said Columbia. She also said UMd is a very very bad choice. For who, exactly? Sounds pretty pretentious.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one getting offered at Maryland is going to Columbia.Anonymous wrote:And on the flip side, some people find it absolutely insane that anyone would choose Syracuse or UMD over any of the Ivies.
Because when lacrosse is over, 4 years from now, where do you want your degree from? UMD over Columbia?
That seems a very, very poor choice.
My point is, there are people on both sides.
But they might go to Harvard or Yale...
Anonymous wrote:No one getting offered at Maryland is going to Columbia.Anonymous wrote:And on the flip side, some people find it absolutely insane that anyone would choose Syracuse or UMD over any of the Ivies.
Because when lacrosse is over, 4 years from now, where do you want your degree from? UMD over Columbia?
That seems a very, very poor choice.
My point is, there are people on both sides.
No one getting offered at Maryland is going to Columbia.Anonymous wrote:And on the flip side, some people find it absolutely insane that anyone would choose Syracuse or UMD over any of the Ivies.
Because when lacrosse is over, 4 years from now, where do you want your degree from? UMD over Columbia?
That seems a very, very poor choice.
My point is, there are people on both sides.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?
There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.
But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.
Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.
I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A
UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A
NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.
They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.
One thing you're also completely missing is that a lot of these ratings are done by appearing at certain events hosted by Inside Lacrosse and certain INDIVIDUAL showcases or invite only events (Politics) where evaluation may happen. These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events. CapBlue has a very strict attendance policy, which conflicts with and limits players' ability to attend most of these costly, unnecessary events that could probably get more of them rated. A player doesn't need a five or four star rating or any of those individual showcases or rankings to get recruited; that is the whole point. A player can also pay to be evaluated by inside lacrosse.
It seems CapBlue wants the players to focus on the team and team building, not going to individual showcases to try to get four and five stars. Cap Blue players have never needed these star rating to get recruited. And for the most part, many cap blue players match up against these 4/5 star players on the field and at tournaments while coaches are watching.
Google about the star ratings and you'll get all kinds of information about the inconsistencies and the politics with it. It's even worse on the boys side- a player will not have a star rating and then they get committed and suddenly they're a five star!
This is incorrect. The girls attended many showcase events and prospect days. The attendance policy is a challenge but I don't know of anyone lost out or or didn't get recruited as a result. Many girls are still going to these events.
And you know this b/c you are a parent on the team? Or did you personally go to all showcases and prospect days to take attendance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?
There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.
But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.
Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.
I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A
UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A
NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.
They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.
One thing you're also completely missing is that a lot of these ratings are done by appearing at certain events hosted by Inside Lacrosse and certain INDIVIDUAL showcases or invite only events (Politics) where evaluation may happen. These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events. CapBlue has a very strict attendance policy, which conflicts with and limits players' ability to attend most of these costly, unnecessary events that could probably get more of them rated. A player doesn't need a five or four star rating or any of those individual showcases or rankings to get recruited; that is the whole point. A player can also pay to be evaluated by inside lacrosse.
It seems CapBlue wants the players to focus on the team and team building, not going to individual showcases to try to get four and five stars. Cap Blue players have never needed these star rating to get recruited. And for the most part, many cap blue players match up against these 4/5 star players on the field and at tournaments while coaches are watching.
Google about the star ratings and you'll get all kinds of information about the inconsistencies and the politics with it. It's even worse on the boys side- a player will not have a star rating and then they get committed and suddenly they're a five star!
This is incorrect. The girls attended many showcase events and prospect days. The attendance policy is a challenge but I don't know of anyone lost out or or didn't get recruited as a result. Many girls are still going to these events.

Anonymous wrote:You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?
There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.
But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.
Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?
There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.
But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.
Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.
I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A
UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A
NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.
They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.
One thing you're also completely missing is that a lot of these ratings are done by appearing at certain events hosted by Inside Lacrosse and certain INDIVIDUAL showcases or invite only events (Politics) where evaluation may happen. These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events. CapBlue has a very strict attendance policy, which conflicts with and limits players' ability to attend most of these costly, unnecessary events that could probably get more of them rated. A player doesn't need a five or four star rating or any of those individual showcases or rankings to get recruited; that is the whole point. A player can also pay to be evaluated by inside lacrosse.
It seems CapBlue wants the players to focus on the team and team building, not going to individual showcases to try to get four and five stars. Cap Blue players have never needed these star rating to get recruited. And for the most part, many cap blue players match up against these 4/5 star players on the field and at tournaments while coaches are watching.
Google about the star ratings and you'll get all kinds of information about the inconsistencies and the politics with it. It's even worse on the boys side- a player will not have a star rating and then they get committed and suddenly they're a five star!
Anonymous wrote:“These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events.”
Are you now saying that Cap parents can’t afford these showcases but other programs families can? Hilarious how this keeps shifting.