Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

Yes, I hear you. It's a terrible story. There's no other way to see it. Terrible. I see the play, too - appeal to suburban moms by showing that Dems allow an environment where your daughter can be murdered by a man who shouldn't have even been here. I could be wrong - I often am - but I feel like you lose some of the power of this, when you've also taken away reproductive rights. I feel like you're better off with a different tack. If I were you, I think I'd go for "why are billions going overseas to conflicts that don't even involve us when here at home we aren't even getting as many Doritos in a bag as we used to," but the last thing I'm gonna do is advise Republicans.

My real advice would be to ditch Trump for literally ANYONE else. But, again, you've made your bed. Maybe he won't even sh** it this time.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-raises-10-mln-24-hours-after-his-state-union-speech-2024-03-10/?utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ozgQ1uLckiAgG62J5bCKoqK6uEV9hE9UeOGKiQFJ01DiItzhwmILUYdA&utm_source=reddit.com

WASHINGTON, March 10 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's re-election campaign said on Sunday it raised $10 million in the 24 hours following a fiery State of the Union address, where he accused Donald Trump of threatening democracy and torpedoing a bill to tackle U.S. immigration woes.

Exactly. People love to point to polls rather than results.
Polls don't vote, polls don't give money.
Voters vote, voters give money.

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised no advisor-lawyers said “He was not illegal then, but once the system takes its course, it is likely that eventually he will be proven to be illegal or unlawful. It depends on the point of time in which you were characterizing this individual.”

Calling an illegal immigrant an 'undocumented worker' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

"Trying this."

LOL. No, we are criticizing him for apologizing to a murderer instead of apologizing to Laken Riley's family.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-raises-10-mln-24-hours-after-his-state-union-speech-2024-03-10/?utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ozgQ1uLckiAgG62J5bCKoqK6uEV9hE9UeOGKiQFJ01DiItzhwmILUYdA&utm_source=reddit.com

WASHINGTON, March 10 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's re-election campaign said on Sunday it raised $10 million in the 24 hours following a fiery State of the Union address, where he accused Donald Trump of threatening democracy and torpedoing a bill to tackle U.S. immigration woes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

I guess Rs feel like they finally found their in for criticizing the speech, eh? Biden wasn't doddering so you tried too energetic and angry - but when that didn't really stick, you're trying this.

Well, maybe try running a candidate who isn't a rapist taking away all our rights and see if that makes for a stickier campaign.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

Biden showed weakness. Because he is weak.

If your daughter was murdered by an illegal alien, and the president of the United States got her name wrong and then apologized to her murderer, I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem with it.

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

I actually don't think the party showed weakness

But yes, progressives live to kneecap Dems while ignoring Rs ushering a clownish totalitarian state

I am surprised no advisor-lawyers said “He was not illegal then, but once the system takes its course, it is likely that eventually he will be proven to be illegal or unlawful. It depends on the point of time in which you were characterizing this individual.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

Huge political misstep. He should never have apologized and stuck to his original instinct which was to stand his ground on “illegal.” He looks weak and worse, it can be spun as “apologizing to a murderer.” Not worth placating the far left in his party on an issue many people are declaring their number one for this race. Dumb.

There is nothing wrong with the word illegal. -Hispanic, female mid 40s.

I learned about issue that from here. No, no apologies please. He doesn’t have to do fhd next time. No word mincing. Once you say it is done. Next time. Lawyers and language academy panels can go away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

LOL. You keep telling yourself that, Jill. It was a disaster and everyone knows it.

Trump is a disaster and Biden is the ticket to protect the country.. this is the same as 2020 only trump is even more exposed as a crook.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

LOL. You keep telling yourself that, Jill. It was a disaster and everyone knows it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Per CNN polling, Joe Biden gave the WORST RECEIVED State of the Union address in 25 years.

“The 65 percent who had a positive view of the speech was actually lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century — the previous low being Donald Trump’s 2018 address (70 percent).

And the 35 percent who offered a “very” positive review was effectively tied with Biden’s speech last year (34 percent) for the lowest on record. The next lowest were Biden’s 2022 speech and George W. Bush’s 2007 speech, which each earned “very” positive marks from 41 percent of viewers.”

This is the best spin WAPO can muster:

65% positive is great. 35% are delusional cult members, too far gone to have an honest opinion of Biden or anything or anyone.

“…lower than any such speech CNN has polled in the past quarter-century” is great to you?

Why are Biden supporters so willing to settle for such a dire situation? Put your focus on getting him to retire and get some fresh blood in for this election.

Why? He is going to win like last time.

Anonymous wrote:Biden did well until his party showed weakness and took issue with his use of words. Making him apologize for mundane words isn't going to go well against Trump. Do progressive really need to make every little thing an issue?

Huge political misstep. He should never have apologized and stuck to his original instinct which was to stand his ground on “illegal.” He looks weak and worse, it can be spun as “apologizing to a murderer.” Not worth placating the far left in his party on an issue many people are declaring their number one for this race. Dumb.