Anonymous
02/11/2026 23:19
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Good God.
He claims he was a consultant for the Strategy Group regarding biotech investments--remember a lot of emails have to do with investments and deals. People could be lured in by many means--sex, money, recognition (names on buildings, whatever). The medical center he worked at was named after Wexner.
I can see it as possible that people who weren't personally involved in sexual activities managed to overlook his known history for the other benefits.
Dr. Oz and his wife invited Epstein to their Valentine's party in 2016.
Anonymous
02/11/2026 22:12
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
I just read a Twitter thread from a lawyer about the info dumps are designed to:
1) Tire us out so we stop paying any attention
2) Confuse us because the info has little shape and is full of chaos.
The lawyer who wrote about this said the dumps are by design. If we do either of the above, Trump and company win.
Really sick.
1) Tire us out so we stop paying any attention
2) Confuse us because the info has little shape and is full of chaos.
The lawyer who wrote about this said the dumps are by design. If we do either of the above, Trump and company win.
Really sick.
Anonymous
02/11/2026 21:51
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If not illegal, it's certainly super unprofessional.
It's disgusting.
So they’re tracking the internet activity of congresspeople?
According to the post above, these are the searches in the unredacted files that congresspeople are allowed to view in a specific place on DOJ computers.
I don’t know what the expectation of privacy is like when using those computers under those circumstances. But it does raise the question of why the DOJ would want to know what each person was looking at. My only assumption is that they’re trying to stay ahead of anything they see as potentially damaging to Trump and/or other powerful people.
Yes- I was thinking the same. They are playing defense.
Anonymous
02/11/2026 21:49
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If not illegal, it's certainly super unprofessional.
It's disgusting.
So they’re tracking the internet activity of congresspeople?
According to the post above, these are the searches in the unredacted files that congresspeople are allowed to view in a specific place on DOJ computers.
I don’t know what the expectation of privacy is like when using those computers under those circumstances. But it does raise the question of why the DOJ would want to know what each person was looking at. My only assumption is that they’re trying to stay ahead of anything they see as potentially damaging to Trump and/or other powerful people.
Anonymous
02/11/2026 21:29
Subject: Epstein Files
Are they trying to entrap the opposition? Accuse them of looking at inappropriate things or even things that violate law?
Anonymous
02/11/2026 21:23
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
If not illegal, it's certainly super unprofessional.
It's disgusting.
So they’re tracking the internet activity of congresspeople?
Anonymous
02/11/2026 20:56
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
If not illegal, it's certainly super unprofessional.
It's disgusting.
Anonymous
02/11/2026 20:48
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It appears that’s his job. Based on the emails, he says explicitly he works for the Rothschilds and Anne Rothschild says in the emails to Epstein that her family financed the rise of Hitler.
Not all Jews are against anti semitism apparently if it has an incentive. Epstein is therefore a provocateur perhaps to encourage anti semitism and global backlash to Jews. Question is why don’t Jews call out the Rothschild and Muslims call ok the Saudis an Emiratis and Christians call out MaGa, Trump, Vatican? The Brits of all people have gone the farthest at denouncing depravity by banishing Prince Andrew. Good for them.
It’s obvious these rich aholes don’t care who of their tribe gets hurt
It should be remembered that Ariane Rothschild is neither a Rothschild nor Jewish. She's the widow of a Rothschild. When she says her family financed the rise of Hitler she's referring to her family not the Rothschilds.
New PP (haven't commented on this angle). I'm a lifelong bookworm and widely read. I'm fairly certain I've come across a reference to the Rothschilds having financed Hitler. Surely the information is out there if this is true. The Rothschilds were the biggest and wealthiest bank in Europe at that time, so it wouldn't be surprising if their fingers were in that pie.
Anonymous
Anonymous
02/11/2026 20:10
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It appears that’s his job. Based on the emails, he says explicitly he works for the Rothschilds and Anne Rothschild says in the emails to Epstein that her family financed the rise of Hitler.
Not all Jews are against anti semitism apparently if it has an incentive. Epstein is therefore a provocateur perhaps to encourage anti semitism and global backlash to Jews. Question is why don’t Jews call out the Rothschild and Muslims call ok the Saudis an Emiratis and Christians call out MaGa, Trump, Vatican? The Brits of all people have gone the farthest at denouncing depravity by banishing Prince Andrew. Good for them.
It’s obvious these rich aholes don’t care who of their tribe gets hurt
Saudis and Emiratis are just as Zionist as their Israeli counterpart which explains why they were working with Epstein in the first place. Also explains why they support the genocide of Palestinians.
So is that puppet the Israelis are trying to install as Irans president : the ex shah of Iran’s son Reza Pahlavi. So much for democracy
Anonymous
02/11/2026 19:20
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bondi was on her best b.tch behavior today. Trump shook the basket of deplorables and the worst of his Satanic worshipper fell out and are his cabinet
I wish for her, in particular, every thing she so richly deserves, soon, and in spades!
I think Bondi must have been drinking. She can't possibly be like that sober. She is an angry drunk.
She was literally said “why are you talking about the mass coverup of child rape when you should be talking about money.”
Anonymous
02/11/2026 18:56
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
It appears that’s his job. Based on the emails, he says explicitly he works for the Rothschilds and Anne Rothschild says in the emails to Epstein that her family financed the rise of Hitler.
Not all Jews are against anti semitism apparently if it has an incentive. Epstein is therefore a provocateur perhaps to encourage anti semitism and global backlash to Jews. Question is why don’t Jews call out the Rothschild and Muslims call ok the Saudis an Emiratis and Christians call out MaGa, Trump, Vatican? The Brits of all people have gone the farthest at denouncing depravity by banishing Prince Andrew. Good for them.
It’s obvious these rich aholes don’t care who of their tribe gets hurt
Saudis and Emiratis are just as Zionist as their Israeli counterpart which explains why they were working with Epstein in the first place. Also explains why they support the genocide of Palestinians.
Anonymous
Anonymous