Anonymous wrote:The racist posters . I've been here for years and I don't remember posters blatantly being able to post racist rhetoric in the past. We have posters literally copying from hate groups .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it’s the anti-wokeness crusaders, particularly on the politics forum, although they pop up in the education forum and other forums as well. They’re practically rabid in their fury and full of the usual grievances. But I’m old enough to have seen all of this before (eg. bashing “hippies” and the anti-war movement, calling women advocating for more rights “feminazis,” the war on gays, bristling at any minority group trying to stand up for themselves) and I know that the louder and angrier these folks get, the more certain it is that change is coming.
Yes, they are so angry and irrational. Very annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise and point proven - the Markle stans have now invaded here.
![]()
New totally annoying poster: the crazed people who think that anyone who doesn't rabidly and bizarrely hate MM the way they do is a "stan." Good God you people are annoying. I literally just like looking at pictures of pretty dresses, worn by MM and Kate Middleton, and pictures of the cute kids. I can mostly see those in the Cambridge thread because even if there are some KM haters, there aren't a lot and they can be largely ignored. It is, in contrast, impossible to do the same thing with the Sussex thread because there are pages and pages of often-racist vitriol that sounds totally batsh!t crazy, and any normal news or posts are buried. I have to read the fans thread for MM because of the crazies, which is annoying. Idk why MM haters are so unhinged. The KM haters are annoying too, but the MM haters are next-level with it.
Yes! MM haters are next-level crazy. It’s scary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The racist posters . I've been here for years and I don't remember posters blatantly being able to post racist rhetoric in the past. We have posters literally copying from hate groups .
Why do you put a space before your period?
Pp, you're so funny .
L O L
Neither of you is funny. Both of you are likely racists, and you both are annoying posters.
DP. It is a legitimate question. The space before the period is ... odd. And that is saying it nicely. It is obviously being done on purpose because it occurs in more than one sentence. So I join the others in asking: OP, why do you put a space before the periods in your sentences?
BTW be careful before you call me a racist, too. I could be (I mean I could be anything) but my skin color will surprise you.![]()
Purple?
PP makes a serious post about the ridiculous amount of racism on this forum, and in reply a poster decides to be snarky, you cosign this behavior by laughing. Think about that. You claim to be a POC but it's more important to you to make jokes and high fives with your troll buddy than it is to take a stand against racism on this forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise and point proven - the Markle stans have now invaded here.
![]()
New totally annoying poster: the crazed people who think that anyone who doesn't rabidly and bizarrely hate MM the way they do is a "stan." Good God you people are annoying. I literally just like looking at pictures of pretty dresses, worn by MM and Kate Middleton, and pictures of the cute kids. I can mostly see those in the Cambridge thread because even if there are some KM haters, there aren't a lot and they can be largely ignored. It is, in contrast, impossible to do the same thing with the Sussex thread because there are pages and pages of often-racist vitriol that sounds totally batsh!t crazy, and any normal news or posts are buried. I have to read the fans thread for MM because of the crazies, which is annoying. Idk why MM haters are so unhinged. The KM haters are annoying too, but the MM haters are next-level with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The many who think calling others "grandma" "boomer" and similar as insults is just fine. Also everyone else who gives ageism a complete free pass.
"Grandma" is an mentality thing, not age. It's meant if you are stuck in the past.
e.g., My mom isn't "grandma" but my SIL is. And she's 35 years younger.
It's a stupid insult that makes you look weak-minded.
Meh. You’re overreacting
Both are true.
It makes me sad. What would our culture look like if we actually respected grandmothers? American culture does not value the elderly at all, and this is an expression of that. Nothing could be worse, in the youth-obsessed culture, than to call someone old. Our society is ill.
Anonymous wrote:Lately it’s the anti-wokeness crusaders, particularly on the politics forum, although they pop up in the education forum and other forums as well. They’re practically rabid in their fury and full of the usual grievances. But I’m old enough to have seen all of this before (eg. bashing “hippies” and the anti-war movement, calling women advocating for more rights “feminazis,” the war on gays, bristling at any minority group trying to stand up for themselves) and I know that the louder and angrier these folks get, the more certain it is that change is coming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The many who think calling others "grandma" "boomer" and similar as insults is just fine. Also everyone else who gives ageism a complete free pass.
"Grandma" is an mentality thing, not age. It's meant if you are stuck in the past.
e.g., My mom isn't "grandma" but my SIL is. And she's 35 years younger.
It's a stupid insult that makes you look weak-minded.
Meh. You’re overreacting
Both are true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ones who biplanes degree snqpp all miss asemwnd.
+1. ttly%
+ Linoleum!
Anonymous wrote:Anyone that writes an essay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The many who think calling others "grandma" "boomer" and similar as insults is just fine. Also everyone else who gives ageism a complete free pass.
"Grandma" is an mentality thing, not age. It's meant if you are stuck in the past.
e.g., My mom isn't "grandma" but my SIL is. And she's 35 years younger.
It's a stupid insult that makes you look weak-minded.
LOL. So thin-skinned. Maybe you shouldn't spout your outdated, uniformed opinions as truth - 'kay?
Anonymous wrote:No surprise and point proven - the Markle stans have now invaded here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Meghan Markle stans have to be the worst posters on DCUM. By far. Truly some mentally unhinged fanatics that have zero tolerance for anyone that does not deify her. Legit posts with opposing opinions are reported and deleted, which is also strange.
The entertainment forum used to be a fun place to talk about movies and shows and occasionally gossip about celebs, but it's been overrun by stans. I loathe stan culture.