Anonymous
02/15/2022 13:49
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Mark Elias, Jake Sullivan, Kathryn Ruemmler and unknown NSA employee should be worried right now.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 13:25
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of many indictments. Good luck, y’all
Almost as funny as 50 Cent hanging upside! Except that really happened! I hope you can handle disappointment.
Are you sure you want to moor your boat to this pier?
Anonymous
02/15/2022 13:22
Subject: Barr and Durham
This whole thing seems like a lot of hype, and not enough substance.
I’m holding out for more information.
I’m holding out for more information.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 13:13
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Someone in the NSA gave Joffe's consortuim a contract to access the White House secure server. Why is Jake Sullivan still employed as the DNI?
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:50
Subject: Barr and Durham
This whole convoluted mess reads like a QAnon post to get RWNJ all worked up.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:35
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:I know that courts are pretty tolerant of bonkers off-the-wall fillings. But fillings that are misleading or for the purpose of furthering a narrative rather than the case, well, courts don't appreciate that. Durham is in serious danger of sanctions.
It will be interesting to hear what the judge does after this. Sussman's filing calls out the many lies and distortions in Durham's filing, and accuses Durham of trying to (successfully) gin up a right wing media circus.
Anonymous
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:26
Subject: Barr and Durham
I know that courts are pretty tolerant of bonkers off-the-wall fillings. But fillings that are misleading or for the purpose of furthering a narrative rather than the case, well, courts don't appreciate that. Durham is in serious danger of sanctions.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:26
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even known liberal attorney Jonathan Turley points out the hypocrisy of the media...
Curious, why do you think Turley is liberal?
Truth is, when he hit GW law faculty he was (I was a third year that year). After that, some brain injury?
I don't remember that. We didn't think in partisan ideological terms like that in the 20th century. There were only two professors that I thought of as one way or the other (one of each) and neither was Turley.
Anonymous
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:22
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even known liberal attorney Jonathan Turley points out the hypocrisy of the media...
Curious, why do you think Turley is liberal?
Truth is, when he hit GW law faculty he was (I was a third year that year). After that, some brain injury?
He is a liberal. Not a woke anti-liberal and not a liberal apologist who ignores the obvious double standard of an msm that repeated Trump Russia for years and now won’t cover Clinton Russia.
No. He’s a shill for the RWNJ media bubble. He tries to launder their crap. I suspect it’s just rank greed. Although I suppose he could believe the bile he spews.
+1
You can’t exclusively push right wing propaganda and pretend to be a liberal. I know it makes the “*uck your feelings” party feel good to think so, but it’s not so.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:21
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Watching the left and media try to cover is hilarious. Durham has the goods, will prove it in court and others will fall. This is worse than Watergate.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:20
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even known liberal attorney Jonathan Turley points out the hypocrisy of the media...
Curious, why do you think Turley is liberal?
Truth is, when he hit GW law faculty he was (I was a third year that year). After that, some brain injury?
He is a liberal. Not a woke anti-liberal and not a liberal apologist who ignores the obvious double standard of an msm that repeated Trump Russia for years and now won’t cover Clinton Russia.
No. He’s a shill for the RWNJ media bubble. He tries to launder their crap. I suspect it’s just rank greed. Although I suppose he could believe the bile he spews.
Anonymous
02/15/2022 12:15
Subject: Re:Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even known liberal attorney Jonathan Turley points out the hypocrisy of the media...
Curious, why do you think Turley is liberal?
Truth is, when he hit GW law faculty he was (I was a third year that year). After that, some brain injury?
He is a liberal. Not a woke anti-liberal and not a liberal apologist who ignores the obvious double standard of an msm that repeated Trump Russia for years and now won’t cover Clinton Russia.